Abstract
The modern power grids are vulnerable to faults. Without proper management and control methods, a single fault could result in the entire malfunction of the power grid, resulting in huge economic loss. Power grid simulation offers a cost-effective way to simulate possible faults. By analyzing the propagation patterns of different faults, analysts can make corresponding plans for different situations in advance. However, fault propagation analysis relies heavily on human expertise and is always performed manually based on the simulation results. To address this problem, we introduce FaultTracer, a visual analysis system that supports interactive exploration of fault propagation patterns in power grid simulation data. We propose an advanced statistical quality control theory-based anomaly detection method to identify the abnormal bus status caused by the fault. Novel visual representations for multi-dimensional time series are also introduced to display the simulation details and the anomaly detection process. Propagation of the fault is revealed by partitioning the simulation into different stages according to the abnormal status of buses. The effectiveness of FaultTracer is demonstrated by the case studies.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashok A, Govindarasu M, Ajjarapu V (2018) Online detection of stealthy false data injection attacks in power system state estimation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(3):1636–1646. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2596298
Cao N, Lin Y, Gotz D, Du F (2018) Z-glyph: visualizing outliers in multivariate data. Inf Vis 17(1):22–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871616686635
Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection a survey. ACM Comput Surv 41(3):15:1-15:58
Chopade P, Flurchick K, Bikdash M, Kateeb I (2012) Modeling and visualization of smart power grid: real time contingency and security aspects. In 2012 Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon, pp. 1–6. IEEE
Cuffe P, Keane A (2017) Visualizing the electrical structure of power systems. IEEE Syst J 11(3):1810–1821. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2427994
Dey P, Mehra R, Kazi F, Wagh S, Singh NM (2016) Impact of topology on the propagation of cascading failure in power grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(4):1970–1978. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2558465
Dou W, Wang X, Skau D, Ribarsky W, Zhou MX (2012) Leadline: Interactive visual analysis of text data through event identification and exploration. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, VAST 2012, Seattle, WA, USA, October 14–19, 2012, pp. 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2012.6400485
Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw Pract Exp 21(11):1129–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
Fu Y, Aggarwal CC, Parthasarathy S, Turaga DS, Xiong H (2017) REMIX: automated exploration for interactive outlier detection. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Halifax, NS, Canada, August 13 – 17, 2017, pp. 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098154
Gotz D, Stavropoulos H (2014) Decisionflow: visual analytics for high-dimensional temporal event sequence data. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 20(12):1783–1792. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346682
Haroz S, Kosara R, Franconeri SL (2015) The connected scatterplot for presenting paired time series. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 22(9):2174–2186
Havre S, Hetzler E, Whitney P, Nowell L (2002) Themeriver: visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 8(1):9–20
Lin H, Gao S, Gotz D, Du F, He J, Cao N (2018) Rclens: interactive rare category exploration and identification. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 24(7):2223–2237. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2711030
McLachlan P, Munzner T, Koutsofios E, North SC (2008) Liverac: interactive visual exploration of system management time-series data. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2008, 2008, Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008, pp. 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357286
Mets K, Aparicio J, Develder C (2014) Combining power and communication network simulation for cost-effective smart grid analysis. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(3):1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2014.021414.00116
Mikkelsen C, Johansson J, Rissanen M (2011) Interactive information visualization for sensemaking in power grid supervisory systems. In 2011 15th International conference on information visualisation, pp. 119–126. IEEE
Moghaddass R, Wang J (2018) A hierarchical framework for smart grid anomaly detection using large-scale smart meter data. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(6):5820–5830. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2697440
Nga DV, See OH, Xuen CY, Chee LL et al (2012) Visualization techniques in smart grid. Smart Grid Renew Energ 3(03):175
Overbye TJ, Weber JD (2000) New methods for the visualization of electric power system information. In IEEE Symposium on information visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings, pp. 131–16c. IEEE
Poudel S, Ni Z, Hansen TM, Tonkoski R (2016) Cascading failures and transient stability experiment analysis in power grid security. In 2016 IEEE power & energy society innovative smart grid technologies conference, ISGT 2016, Minneapolis, MN, USA, September 6–9, 2016, pp. 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2016.7781166
Schubert E, Wojdanowski R, Zimek A, Kriegel H (2012) On evaluation of outlier rankings and outlier scores. In Proceedings of the twelfth SIAM international conference on data mining, Anaheim, California, USA, April 26–28, 2012, pp. 1047–1058 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972825.90
Steiger M, May T, Davey J, Kohlhammer J (2013) Smart grid monitoring through visual analysis. In 4th IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies Europe, ISGT Europe 2013, Lyngby, Denmark, October 6–9, 2013, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2013.6695316
Thom D, Bosch H, Koch S, Wörner M, Ertl T (2012) Spatiotemporal anomaly detection through visual analysis of geolocated twitter messages. In 2012 IEEE Pacific visualization Symposium, PacificVis 2012, Songdo, Korea (South), February 28 - March 2, 2012, pp. 41–48 https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2012.6183572
Tominski C, Abello J, Schumann H (2004) Axes-based visualizations with radial layouts. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on applied computing (SAC), Nicosia, Cyprus, March 14–17, 2004, pp. 1242–1247 https://doi.org/10.1145/967900.968153
Waser J, Ribicic H, Fuchs R, Hirsch C, Schindler B, Bloschl G, Groller E (2011) Nodes on ropes: a comprehensive data and control flow for steering ensemble simulations. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 17(12):1872–1881
Wong PC, Huang Z, Chen Y, Mackey P, Jin S (2014) Visual analytics for power grid contingency analysis. IEEE Comput Gr Appl 34(1):42–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2014.17
Wong PC, Schneider K, Mackey P, Foote H, Guttromson RT, Thomas J, Chin G Jr (2009) A novel visualization technique for electric power grid analytics. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(3):410–423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.197
Xu K, Xia M, Mu X, Wang Y, Cao N (2019) Ensemblelens: ensemble-based visual exploration of anomaly detection algorithms with multidimensional data. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 25(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864825
Xu P, Mei H, Ren L, Chen W (2017) Vidx: visual diagnostics of assembly line performance in smart factories. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 23(1):291–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598664
Zhao J, Cao N, Wen Z, Song Y, Lin Y, Collins C (2014) #fluxflow: Visual analysis of anomalous information spreading on social media. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 20(12):1773–1782. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346922
Zhao J, Liu Z, Dontcheva M, Hertzmann A, Wilson A (2015) Matrixwave: Visual comparison of event sequence data. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18–23, 2015, pp. 259–268 https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702419
Zhu J, Zhuang E, Ivanov C, Yao Z (2011) A data-driven approach to interactive visualization of power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(4):2539–2546
Acknowledgements
The authors would also like to thank all collaborators from China Electric Power Research Institute (CEPRI). This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFB0904503) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772456, 61761136020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, T., Chen, Z., Zhao, Z. et al. FaultTracer: interactive visual exploration of fault propagation patterns in power grid simulation data. J Vis 24, 1051–1064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00741-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00741-z