Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental study of the effect of the LEX angle on the flow pattern of a diamond wing with an airfoil cross section

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, the effect of the leading-edge extension (LEX) angle on the flow pattern upstream and downstream of the diamond wing has been investigated experimentally. The measurement of turbulence intensity by the hot-wire and the measurement of pressure on the wing by the five-hole probe in a closed-circuit wind tunnel at a free flow velocity of 12.5 m/s, which is equivalent to the Reynolds number of 202,000, have been carried out. In order to better observe the flow physics and qualitative analysis of the vortex flow, the smoke tunnel has been used. In this case, the free flow velocity is equal to 1 m/s equivalent to the Reynolds number of 16,000. The results indicated that the increase in the LEX sweep angle has led to an increase in the strength of the vortex, and with the increase in the angle of attack, the vortices have moved further away from the wing's upper surface. Also, the increase in the angle of attack shifts the breakdown location upstream, eventually reaching a complete wing stall. The use of LEX produced a vortex flow, which delayed the vortex breakdown by increasing the kinetic energy in the vortex core. The turbulence downstream of the wing is reduced with the breakdown delay. The frequency analysis showed that at the vortex core, the instantaneous velocity fluctuations are very high, which indicates an increase in turbulent kinetic energy.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt S, Crisler W, Forystek R and Smith J (2011) Comparative evaluation of butterfly and 4-post tails on a 5th-generation fighter configuration. In: 11th AIAA Aviation Technology Integration and Operations Conference 2011

  • Buzica A, Debschüt L, Breitsamter C (2018) Leading-edge roughness affecting diamond-wing aerodynamic characteristics. Aerosp Sci Technol 5(3):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelik A, Yavuz M (2016) Effect of edge modifications on flow structure of low swept delta wing. AIAA J 54(5):1789–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou M, Miau J (2021) Vortex interaction on a LEX configuration. J vis 24:1189–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels RK, Babu N, Jacob B, Issac J, Mathew EM (2019) Computational study of the pressure field of a five hole probe head and Kiel probe head. Glob Res Dev J Eng, 2 4

  • Dehghan AA, Kazemi Esfeh M, Manshadi MD (2013) Natural ventilation characteristics of one-sided wind catchers: experimental and analytical evaluation. Energy Build 61:366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordnier E, Visbal M (2005) Compact difference scheme applied to simulation of low-sweep deltawing flow. AIAA J 43(8):1744–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueraiche D, Popov S (2018) Improving the aerodynamics of a transport aircraft wing using a delta planform wingtip leading edge extension. Civil Aviat High Technol 21(1):124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitzel S, Boelens O, Rooij M, Hövelmann A (2016) Vortex development on the AVT-183 diamond wing configuration–numerical and experimental findings. Aerosp Sci Technol 57:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inamdar A, Thakur N, Pal D and Mohite A (2021) Flexible wing structure and variable-sweep wing mechanism. Int Res J Eng Technol, 8 3

  • Karasu I, Durhasan T (2020) Flow characteristics over double delta wings at low Reynolds numbers. J Aerosp Eng 33(4):04020038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi Esfeh M, Sohankar A, Shirani E (2021) Influence of rounding corners on the wake of a finite-length cylinder: An experimental study. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 91:108854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek A, Figat M (2016) LEX and wing tip plates’interaction on the rocket plane in tailless configuration. Aeronaut J 120(1224):255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowson M (1990) Visualization measurements of vortex flows. J Aircr 28(5):320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckring J (2019) The discovery and prediction of vortex flow aerodynamics. Aeronaut J 123(1264):729–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum C, Sandhu N, Diebold JM, Woodard B, and Bragg MB (2017) The application of a five-hole probe wake-survey technique to the study of swept wing icing aerodynamics. In: 9th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, pp 4374

  • Mahgoub A, Cortelezzi L (2020) Vortex flow and aerodynamic performance of a reverse delta wing. AIAA J 58(2):537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manshadi MD, Kazemi Esfeh M (2016) Experimental investigation of flowfield over an iced aerofoil. Aeronaut J 120(1227):735–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manshadi MD, Eilbeigi M, Sobhani MK, Bazaz Zadeh M, Vaziry M (2016) Experimental study of flow field distribution over a generic cranked double delta wing. Chin J Aeronaut 29(5):1196–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miloud KB, Dghim M, Fellouah H, Ferchichi M (2020) Free-stream turbulence interaction with a wing-tip vortex. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 206:104211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic V (2006) Planform Effects on Wing-Movable Tip Strake Aerodynamic Performance. In: 6th AIAA Aviation Technology Integration and Operations Conference.

  • Pereira FP, Eça L, Vaz G (2019) Simulation of wingtip vortex flows with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and scale-resolving simulation methods. AIAA J 57(3):932–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfnür S, Oppelt S, Breitsamter Ch (2019) Yaw-control efficiency analysis for a diamond wing configuration with outboard split flaps. CEAS Aeronaut J 10:645–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidinezhad A, Dehghan A, Manshadi MD (2015) Nose shape effect on the visualized flow field around an axisymmetric body of revolution at incidence. J vis 18:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah G (1991) Wind Tunnel Investigation of Aerodynamic and Tail Buffet Characteristics of Leading-Edge Extension Modifications to the F/A-18. In: 18th Atmospheric flight mechanics conference, pp 395–412

  • Shen L, Wen Ch (2018) Oscillations of leading-edge vortex breakdown locations over a delta wing. AIAA J 56(6):2113–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Chen Z, Wen Ch (2018) Experimental investigation of the flow structure over a delta wing via flow visualization methods. J vis Exp 134:e57244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Suthar A, Sahoo S, Pawar AA, Ranjan K and Saha S (2017) Effect of sweep angle on wing-strake vortex interaction and breakdown over double delta wings. In: 2017 First international conference on recent advances in aerospace engineering, pp 1–6

  • Sohn M (2010) Effect of apex strake incidence-angle on the vortex development and interaction of a double-delta wing. Exp Fluids 48:565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touzopoulos P, Boviatsis D, Zikidis K (2017) Constructing a 3D model of a complex object from 2D images for the purpose of estimating its radar cross section (RCS). J Comput Model 7:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani A, Aprovitola A, Iuspa L, Pezzella G (2020) Low speed longitudinal aerodynamics of a blended wing-body re-entry vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol 107:106303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Ch, Gao Q, Wei R, Li T, Wang J (2016) 3D flow visualization and tomographic particle image velocimetry for vortex breakdown over a non-slender delta wing. Exp Fluids 57:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaniktepe B, Rockwell D (2004) Flow Structure on a delta wing of low sweep angle. AIAA J 42(3):513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaniktepe B, Rockwell D (2005) Flow structure on diamond and lambda planforms trailing-edge region. AIAA J 43(7):1490–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Y, Hu T, Liu P, Qu Q, Eitelberg G, Akkermans AD (2020) Dynamic lift characteristics of nonslender delta wing in large-amplitude-pitching. Aerosp Sci Technol 105:105937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Huang J (2023) W-type flying wing radar cross-section analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 237(5):1094–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu M, Qin N (2021) Balancing laminar extension and wave drag for transonic swept wings. AIAA J 59(5):1660–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikidis K, Skondras A, Tokas Ch (2014) low observable principles, stealth aircraft and anti-stealth technologies. J Comput Model 4(1):129–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman S, Philip J, Marino N, Klewicki J (2018) Downstream recovery of turbulence kinetic energy in the wake of a turbulent boundary layer wing-body junction flow. In: 21st Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Hashemi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashemi, M.R., Dehghan Manshadi, M. Experimental study of the effect of the LEX angle on the flow pattern of a diamond wing with an airfoil cross section. J Vis 26, 1247–1262 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-023-00942-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-023-00942-2

Keywords

Navigation