Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Principles for organization of creative groups

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this paper we first propose an outline for an overall organization of the group creative process. In particular two major components of the process are considered in detail. For group selection, diversity measures including those based on information theory and a species diversity measure are discussed and examples provided. The idea of a diversity space is also introduced to obtain some intuition on the issues relative to population diversity. The actual creative idea generation process is then considered with respect to the social interactions inside the selected creative group. Approaches to modeling the ways in which linguistic persuasion can occur are described. Finally approaches to the generalization of the ideas that evolved using concept hierarchies are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ackert L, Deaves R (2009) Behavioral finance psychology, decision-making, and markets. South-Western Educational Publictions, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning G (2006) Emergenetics: tap into the new science of success. Harper Collins, New York

  • Buckles B, Petry F (1992) Genetic algorithms. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch R (2010) Deduction induction, and abduction, Chapter 3. In: Edward N Zalta (ed) “Charles Sanders Peirce”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2010 edn). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/peirce/

  • Burke E, Gustafson S, Kendall G (2004) Diversity in genetic programming: an analysis of measures and correction with fitness. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(1):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini R (2001) The science of persuasion. Sci Am 284(2):76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford C, Agah A (2009) Sharing in teams of heterogeneous, collaborative learning agents. Int J Intell Syst 24(2):173–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg M (1987) Readings in nonmonotonic reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Kamber M (2006) Data mining: concepts and techniques, 2nd edn. CA Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Cai Y, Cercone N (1992) Knowledge discovery in databases: an attribute-oriented approach. In: Proceedings of 18th VLDB conference, pp 547–559

  • Josephson J, Josephson S (eds) Abductive inference: computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

  • Kacprzyk J (1999) Fuzzy logic for linguistic summarization of databases. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on fuzzy systems, Seoul, Korea, pp 813–818

  • Lee D, Kim M (1997) Database summarization using fuzzy ISA hierarchies. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 27(1):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loden M, Roesner J (1991) Workforce America!: Managing employee diversity as a vital resource. Business One Irwin, Homewood

  • Morrison R, DeJong K (2001) Measurement of population diversity. Selected papers: 5th international conference on evolution artificielle. Springer, pp 31–41

  • Nandhini M, Kanmani S, Anandan S (2011) Performance analysis of diversity measure with crossover operators in genetic algorithms. Int J Comput Appl 19(2):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus P (1999) Group creativity. In: Runco M, Pritzker S (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 1. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 779–784

  • Pelta D, Cruz C, Gonzalez J (2009) A study on diversity and cooperation in a multiagent strategy for dynamic optimization problems. Int J Intell Syst 24(7):844–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry F, Yager R (2008) Evidence resolution using concept hierarchies. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry F, Zhao L (2009) Data mining by attribute generalization with fuzzy hierarchies in fuzzy databases. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(15):2206–2223

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou E (1996) Shannon’s formula as a measure of specific diversity: its use and misuse. Am Nat 100(914):463–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puccio G (1999) Teams. In: Runco M, Pritzker S (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 639–650

  • Raschia R, Mouaddib N (2002) SAINTETIQ:a fuzzy set-based approach to database summarization. Fuzzy Sets Syst 129:37–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter R (1980) A logic for default reasoning. Artif Intell 13:81–132

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson E (1949) Measurement of specis diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • West M, Richards T (1999) Innovation. In: Runco M, Pritzker S (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 45–56

  • Xu Z (2009) An interactive approach to multiple attribute decision making with multi-granular uncertain linguistic information. Group Decis Negot 18:119–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (1990) A model of participatory learning. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(5):1229–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (1991) On linguistic summaries of data. In: Piatesky-Shapiro G, Frawley (eds) Knowledge discovery in databases. MIT Press, Boston, pp 347–363

  • Yager R (1993) Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making. Int J Group Decis Mak Negotiat 2:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (1998) A generalized view of non-monotonic knowledge: a set theoretic perspective. Int J Gen Syst 14:251–265

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (2004) On the retranslation process in Zadeh’s paradigm of computing with words. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber A 34(2):1184–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2007) Multi-agent negotiation using linguistically expressed mediation rules. Group Decis Negot 16:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (2009) Participatory learning with granular observations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R (2010) Including a diversity criterion in decision making. Int J Intell Syst 25(9):958–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R, Petry F (2006) A multicriteria approach to data summarization using concept ontologies. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(6):767–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P (2011) A note on diversity criterion in decision making. Int J Intell Syst 26:652–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Naval Research Laboratory’s Base Program, Program Element No. 0602435N and ONR Grant Award No. N000141010121 for sponsoring this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, Hancock, MS, 39529, USA

    Frederick E. Petry

  2. Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College, New Rochelle, NY, 10801, USA

    Ronald R. Yager

Authors
  1. Frederick E. Petry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald R. Yager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald R. Yager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petry, F.E., Yager, R.R. Principles for organization of creative groups. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 5, 789–797 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-013-0213-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-013-0213-8

Keywords