Abstract
Driving behavior optimization not only lowers the occurrence probability of the traffic accident and pollutant emissions, but also improves the energy efficiency level. Current studies indicate that corresponding data processing method deadly influence accuracy and rationality of driving behavior estimation results. However, due to the complexity of road environment, driving behavior estimation always faces the common difficulties of model establishment. In this paper, a new concept, critical zone, is defined to distinguish special driving areas. A typical critical zone, bus stop, is selected as modeling target area, while corresponding driving process—bus enters and leaves bus stop process—is selected to construct driving behavior model. Then, a good driving behavior parameters discovery method, which aims to provide real-time operation recommendations for bus stop accessing procedure, optimize driving technology, reduce fuel consumption and improve comfort, is proposed. A zone and time oriented slicing process is employed to mapping corresponding data into multiple distinguished procedures, in which both clustering and pruning processing are used to deal with data of each slice to get good driving behavior parameters. Moreover, an application based C/S model is used to test effectiveness of proposed method. Test results demonstrate that the developed model and parameter discovery method are effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Beckx C, Panis LI, Vlieger ID, Wets G (2007) Influence of gear-changing behaviour on fuel use and vehicular exhaust emissions. In: Highway and urban environment. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 45–51
Cary A, Sun Z, Hristidis V, Rishe N (2009) Experiences on processing spatial data with MapReduce. In: Scientific and statistical database management. Springer, Berlin, pp 302–319
Chen C, Zhang D, Ma X, Guo B, Wang L, Wang Y, Sha E (2017) Crowddeliver: planning city-wide package delivery paths leveraging the crowd of taxis. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(6):1478–1496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2607458
Chen C, Jiao S, Zhang S, Liu W, Feng L, Wang Y (2018) TripImputor: real-time imputing taxi trip purpose leveraging multi-sourced urban data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 99:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2771231
Chong L, Abbas MM, Medina Flintsch A, Higgs B (2013) A rule-based neural network approach to model driver naturalistic behavior in traffic. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 32:207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.011
Cui X, Zhu P, Yang X, Li K, Ji C (2014) Optimized big data K-means clustering using MapReduce. J Supercomput 70(3):1249–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-014-1225-7
Ericsson E (2001) Independent driving pattern factors and their influence on fuel-use and exhaust emission factors. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 6(5):325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00003-7
Fan B, Krishnan H (2006) Reliability analysis of DSRC wireless communication for vehicle safety applications. In: 2006 IEEE intelligent transportation systems conference, 17–20 Sept. 2006, pp 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2006.1706767
Goldenbeld C, Levelt PBM, Heidstra J (2000) Psychological perspectives on changing driver attitude and behaviour. Recherche Transp Sécurité 67:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0761-8980(00)90108-0
Gonder J, Earleywine M, Sparks W (2012) Analyzing vehicle fuel saving opportunities through intelligent driver feedback. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Electron Electr Syst 5(2):450–461. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0494
Guo B, Han Q, Chen H, Shangguan L, Zhou Z, Yu Z (2017) The emergence of visual crowdsensing: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 19(4):2526–2543. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2726686
He Y, Yan X, Wu C, Chu D, Peng L (2013) Effects of driver’s unsafe acceleration behaviors on passengers’ comfort for coach buses. ICTIS. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413036.220
Liu X, Xie H, Ma H, Chen S (2014) The effects of bus driver’s behavior on fuel consumption and its evaluation indicator. Automot Eng 11:1321–1326
Meng X, Zeng C, Yang D, Cai F, Xia H (2012) Analysis of the vehicle fuel consumption for different driving operation behavior. Energy Conserv Environ Prot Transp 8
Meseguer JE, Chai KT, Calafate CT, Cano JC, Manzoni P (2017) Drivingstyles: a mobile platform for driving styles and fuel consumption characterization. J Commun Netw 19(2):162–168
Neumann I, Franke T, Cocron P, Bühler F, Krems JF (2015) Eco-driving strategies in battery electric vehicle use—how do drivers adapt over time? IET Intell Transp Syst 9(7):746–753. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0221
Rolim C, Baptista P, Duarte G, Farias T, Pereira J (2017) Real-time feedback impacts on eco-driving behavior and influential variables in fuel consumption in a lisbon urban bus operator. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(11):3061–3071. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2657333
Saremi F, Fatemieh O, Ahmadi H, Wang H, Abdelzaher T, Ganti R, Liu H, Hu S, Li S, Su L (2016) Experiences with GreenGPS—fuel-efficient navigation using participatory sensing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 15(3):672–689. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2015.2421939
Steinley D (2006) K-means clustering: a half-century synthesis. Br J Math Stat Psychol 59(1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X48266
Tang T-Q, Huang H-J, Shang H-Y (2015) Influences of the driver’s bounded rationality on micro driving behavior, fuel consumption and emissions. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 41:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.016
Tulusan J, Soi L, Paefgen J, Brogle M, Staake T (2011) Eco-efficient feedback technologies: Which eco-feedback types prefer drivers most? In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks, 20–24 June 2011, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2011.5986187
Wang L, Zhang D, Wang Y, Chen C, Han X, M’hamed A (2016) Sparse mobile crowdsensing: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun Mag 54(7):161–167. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7509395
Wei D (2011) National bus fuel saving skill contest of China. http://auto.sohu.com/20110915/n319606048.shtml. Accessed 15 Sep 2011
Yan X, Hui Z, Chaozhong WU, Zhe M, Hu L (2013) Research progress and prospect of road traffic driving behavior. J Transp Inf Saf 31:45–51
Yang XU, Shi-Jian LI, Jiao WJ, Pan G (2015) Driving behavior identification system and application. Comput Sci
Zhang M, Chen C, Wo T, Xie T, Bhuiyan MZA, Lin X (2017) SafeDrive: online driving anomaly detection from large-scale vehicle data. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13(4):2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2674661
Acknowledgements
Thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that resulted in a significantly improved paper. This work was supported in part by the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Vehicle NVH and Safety Technology under Grant NVHSKL-201511, in part by the National Nature Science Foundation of China, under Project 61601066, in part by Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacture Technology for Automobile Parts Chongqing University of Technology, in part by Ministry of Education, under Grant 2016KLMT01and 2017KLMT04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, Q., Zeng, L., Hu, Y. et al. Driving behavior modeling and evaluation for bus enter and leave stop process. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 9, 1647–1658 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0802-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0802-7