Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adopting the multidimensional balanced scorecard approach to improve project management and organizational performance can help reduce project risks and potential disasters in order to maximize the investment benefits and security of IT projects with high risks. We adopted the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) research context, whose stimulus, organism, and response refer to project risk, project management, and organizational performance, respectively. Furthermore, a questionnaire survey of project management experts was conducted. We then utilized the DANP model, which combines the Decision-Making Trial Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and the analytical network process, to explore the relationships among project risks, project management, and organizational performance. We observed the following: (a) effective project management can reduce project risk and improve organizational performance; (b) project risk is most influenced by the user; (c) senior manager support significantly influences project management; (d) organizational learning and growth has a significant impact on organizational performance; and (e) the criteria with the largest relative weight is generally considered to pose a risk, which indicates that the experts seriously consider that project risk. Our results can provide a valuable reference for project management to reduce risk and improve organizational performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Sangaiah AK (2017) Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0548-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Altuntas S, Dereli T (2015) A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1003–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassen A, Blasel D, Faisst U, Hagenmuller M (2006) Performance measurement of corporate venture capital–balanced scorecard in theory and practice. Int J Technol Manage 33(4):420–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker K, Boonstra A, Wortmann H (2010) Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Int J Proj Manage 28(5):493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carvalho MM, Patah LA, De Souza Bido D (2015) Project management and its effects on project success: cross-country and cross-industry comparisons. Int J Proj Manage 33(7):1509–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine K, Kloppenborg TJ, O’Clock P (2010) Project measurement and success: a balanced scorecard approach. J Health Care Finance 36(4):38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1973) Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL report no. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Gido J, Clements JP (2012) Successful project management. Cengage, Mason, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Golini R, Kalchschmidt M, Landoni P (2015) Adoption of project management practices: the impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations. Int J Project Manage 33(3):650–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal J, Sangaiah AK, Basu A, Gao XZ (2018) Integration of fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 9(2):225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal RK, Kaushal S, Sangaiah AK (2018) The utility based non-linear fuzzy AHP optimization model for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Appl Soft Comput 67:800–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Deng Y (2018) A hybrid intelligent model for assessment of critical success factors in high-risk emergency system. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Han WM, Huang SJ (2007) An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J Syst Softw 80(1):42–50

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jun L, Qiuzhen W, Qingguo M (2011) The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: a vendor perspective. Int J Project Manage 29(7):923–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton D (1992) The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70(1):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns GS (2007) How the internal environment impacts information systems project success: an investigation of exploitative and explorative firms. J Comput Inf Syst 48(1):63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner H (1984) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CL, Lai SQ (2007) Performance measurement systems for knowledge management in high technology industries: a balanced scorecard framework. Int J Technol Manage 39(1–2):158–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ (2015) Building an effective system for carbon reduction management. J Clean Prod 103:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ, Chuang YC, Tzeng GH (2014) A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement. Inf Sci 266:199–217

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xia F, Zhang J, Pan W, Zhang Y (2016) Exploring the trends, characteristic antecedents, and performance consequences of crowdsourcing project risks. Int J Project Manage 34(8):1625–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirmousa S, Dehnavi HD (2016) Development of criteria of selecting the supplier by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 230:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northcutt N, McCoy D (2004) Interactive qualitative analysis: a systems method for qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odzaly EE, Greer D, Stewart D (2018) Agile risk management using software agents. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9(3):823–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JK, Slevin DP (1987) Critical factors in successful project implementation. Eng Manag IEEE Trans Eng Manag 34(1):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. R W S Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK, Thangavelu AK (2013) An exploration of FMCDM approach for evaluating the outcome/success of GSD projects. Central Eur J Eng 3(3):419–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK, Subramaniam PR, Zheng X (2015) A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for evaluating GSD project outcome factors. Neural Comput Appl 26(5):1025–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK, Gopal J, Basu A, Subramaniam PR (2017) An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe K (2010) Information technology project management, revised. Cengage, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen KY, Hu SK, Tzeng GH (2017) Financial modeling and improvement planning for the life insurance industry by using a rough knowledge based hybrid MCDM model. Inf Sci 375:296–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Supeekit T, Somboonwiwat T, Kritchanchai D (2016) DEMATEL-modified ANP to evaluate internal hospital supply chain performance. Comput Ind Eng 102:318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Os A, Van Berkel F, De Gilder D, Van Dyck C, Groenewegen P (2015) Project risk as identity threat: explaining the development and consequences of risk discourse in an infrastructure project. Int J Proj Manag 33(4):877–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal LA, Marle F, Bocquet JC (2013) Building up a project complexity framework using an international Delphi study. Int J Technol Manage 62(2/3/4):251–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ET, Wei HL, Jiang JJ, Klein G (2006) User diversity impact on project performance in an environment with organizational technology learning and management review processes. Int J Proj Manage 24(5):405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems LL, Vanhoucke M (2015) Classification of articles and journals on project control and earned value management. Int J Proj Manage 33(7):1610–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW (2008) Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):828–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW, Lee YT (2007) Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu KJ, Liao CJ, Tseng ML, Lim MK, Hu J, Tan K (2017) Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J Clean Prod 142:663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim R, Castaneda J, Doolen T, Tumer I, Malak R (2015) A study of the impact of project classification on project risk indicators. Int J Proj Manage 33(4):863–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2016) Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. Int J Proj Manage 34(5):819–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Shi Y, Deng X, Deng Y (2017) D-DEMATEL: a new method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Saf Sci 91:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (2000) An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 122(2):190–198

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, Hwa Hsia University of Technology, 111, Gong Jhuan Rd., Chung Ho District, New Taipei City, 235, Taiwan, ROC

    You-Shyang Chen

  2. Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123, University Rd., Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin, 640, Taiwan, ROC

    Huan-Ming Chuang, Chien-Ku Lin & Wen-Bin Huang

  3. School of Computing Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India

    Arun Kumar Sangaiah

Authors
  1. You-Shyang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huan-Ming Chuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arun Kumar Sangaiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chien-Ku Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wen-Bin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Ku Lin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YS., Chuang, HM., Sangaiah, A.K. et al. A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10, 2669–2681 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0973-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0973-2

Keywords