Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The optimal game model of energy consumption for nodes cooperation in WSN

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that the energy of wireless sensor network nodes is very limited. In order to solve this problem, considering all the nodes in the cluster, we propose an optimal model of energy consumption for nodes cooperation based on game theory. The model establishes the payoff function of nodes’ residual energy with the main energy consumption factor of the nodes, energy consumption of communication, as the argument. The nodes’ coalitions are constructed through the combination of exhaustion and the sub-regions division. The Nash Equilibrium of cooperative game is solved by using the nodes income distribution method based on Shapley value. With the proposed method, the maximum residual energy of the nodes in the cluster is obtained. The experimental results show that, compared with the game model of non-cooperative, the optimal game model of energy consumption for nodes cooperation has obvious advantages in energy-saving efficiency. As the number of nodes increases, the energy-saving efficiency increases from 12.870 to 38.796%. This paper also verifies that the optimal game model of energy consumption for nodes cooperation has better stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abbasi M, Fisal N (2015) Noncooperative game-based energy welfare topology control for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 15(4):2344–2355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd MA, Singh BK, Al Rubeaai SF, Tepe KE, Benlamri R (2014) Game theoretic energy balanced (GTEB) routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2014 IEEE. IEEE, pp 2564–2569

  • Alemdar H, Ersoy C (2010) Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: a survey. Comput Netw 54:2688–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhmiedat T (2015) A survey on environmental monitoring systems using wireless sensor networks. J Netw 10(11):606–615

    Google Scholar 

  • AlSkaif T, Zapata MG, Bellalta B (2015) Game theory for energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: latest trends. J Netw Comput Appl 54:33–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behzadan A, Anpalagan A, Ma B (2011) Prolonging network lifetime via nodal energy balancing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Communications (ICC), 2011 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Cubitt R (1991) The shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S. Shapley by Alvin E. Roth. Econ J 101(406):644–646.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2233574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Xu C, Liu Y (2009) Energy balanced scheme based on variable cell transmission range for wireless sensor networks. In: Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2009. WiCom ‘09. 5th international conference on. IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Dong M, Ota K, Liu A (2016) RMER: reliable and energy-efficient data collection for large-scale wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 3(4):511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Đurišić MP, Tafa Z, Dimić G, Milutinović V (2012) A survey of military applications of wireless sensor networks. In: Embedded computing (MECO), 2012 Mediterranean conference on. IEEE, pp 196–199

  • Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: System sciences, 2000. Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on. IEEE, pp 1–10

  • Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 1(4):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer R, Kleinrock L (2003) QoS control for sensor networks. In: Communications, 2003. ICC ‘03. IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp 517–521

  • Kazemeyni F, Johnsen EB, Owe O et al (2011) Group selection by nodes in wireless sensor networks using coalitional game theory. In: Engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS), 2011 16th IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp 253–262

  • Lin XH, Kwok YK, Wang H, Xie N (2015a) A game theoretic approach to balancing energy consumption in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput 15(1):170–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY, Wang Q, Lin DQ, Deng Y (2015b) An energy-efficient clustering routing protocol based on evolutionary game theory in wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens N 11(11):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/409503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XX (2015) An optimal-distance-based transmission strategy for lifetime maximization of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 15(6):3484–3491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magno M, Polonelli T, Benini L, Popovici E (2015) A low cost, highly scalable wireless sensor network solution to achieve smart LED light control for green buildings. IEEE Sens J 15(5):2963–2973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manshaei MH, Zhu Q, Alpcan T, Basar T, Hubaux J-P (2013) Game theory meets network security and privacy. ACM Comput Surv 45(3):1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480742

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ojha T, Misra S, Raghuwanshi NS (2015) Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: the state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Comput Electron Agric 118:66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S, Chatterjee M, Kwiat K (2010) A game theoretic framework for power control in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 59(2):231–242

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Z, Mahapatra C, Zhu C, Leung Victor CM (2015) Recent advances in industrial wireless sensor networks towards efficient management in IoT. IEEE Access 3:622–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi HY, Wang WL, Kwok NM, Chen SY (2012) Game theory for wireless sensor networks: a survey. Sensors 12(7):9055–9097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinoba VD, Sridevi S (2017) Enhancing the lifetime in wireless sensor networks using non-zero sum cooperative and non-cooperative repeated game theory. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng Inf Technol (IJSRCSEIT) 2(4):679–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (2007) Theory of games and economic behavior (commemorative edition). Princeton university press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Luo S, Gao J (2017) Uncertain extensive game with application to resource allocation of national security. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Wang Y, Wang W, Ding Y (2018) Evolutionary game analysis for third-party governance of environmental pollution. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1034-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Poor HV (2009) Coalition games with cooperative transmission: a cure for the curse of boundary nodes in selfish packet-forwarding wireless networks. IEEE Trans Commun 57(1):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

National Natural Science Foundation of China; Award Number: 61379100; Recipient: Hongsheng Yin, National Natural Science Foundation of China; Award Number: 51574232; Recipient: Gang Hua, National Natural Science Foundation of China; Award Number: 61472388; Recipient: Honggang Qi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Jun Zhang, Jihang Yin & Hongsheng Yin

  2. Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China

    Tianyi Xu

  3. Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Ziyang Gao

  4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 101408, China

    Honggang Qi

Authors
  1. Jun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jihang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tianyi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziyang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Honggang Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongsheng Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongsheng Yin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Yin, J., Xu, T. et al. The optimal game model of energy consumption for nodes cooperation in WSN. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11, 589–599 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1128-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1128-1

Keywords