Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the role of Proximity and Eye gaze in human–computer interaction for individuals with autism

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atypical gaze coupled with impairments in communication skills in varying social situations are some of the core deficits of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Certain aspects of social situations e.g., communicator’s Proximity and Eye-gaze are important for nurturing effective two-way social communication. Additionally, limited explicit expression of cognitive states for ASD, necessitates picking up of implicit measures e.g., gaze and physiology (not affected by communication vulnerabilities). Thus, it is important to explore variations in gaze (quantified by fixation duration) and physiology (e.g., pupil diameter, blink rate) in response to social situations embedded with variations in Proximity and Eye-gaze. In our present study, we have investigated the implication of systematically manipulated Proximity and Eye-gaze of a social communicator on one’s gaze and gaze-related physiological indices, when exposed to virtual reality based social situations. For this, we designed a usability study with 14 age-matched pairs of individuals with ASD and typically developing (TD) group. The results indicated that both Proximity and Eye-gaze can cause variations in one’s task performance, gaze pattern and gaze-related physiology for both ASD and TD groups, though by varying amounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyle M, Cook M (1976) Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Autism cases rise in last two decades (2017) The Times of India, (April, 2017). https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/visakhapatnam/autism-cases-rise-in-last-two-decades/articleshow/57967289.cms

  • Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis JM (2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29(7):819–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman R (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37(3):379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binetti N, Harrison C, Coutrot A, Johnston A, Mareschal I (2016) Pupil dilation as an index of preferred mutual gaze duration. R Soc Open Sci 3(7):160086

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona G, Quevedo N (2014) Blinking and driving: the influence of saccades and cognitive workload. Curr Eye Res 39(3):239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler S, Charman T, Baird G, Simonoff E, Loucas TOM, Meldrum D, Pickles A (2007) Validation of the social communication questionnaire in a population cohort of children with autism spectrum disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46(10):1324–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi HH, Van Merriënboer JJ, Paas F (2014) Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev 26(2):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn A, Cohen MF, Drucker S (2000) The role of eye gaze in avatar mediated conversational interfaces. In: Sketches and applications. Siggraph’00

  • Coon H, Villalobos ME, Robison RJ, Camp NJ, Cannon DS, Allen-Brady K, McMahon WM (2010) Genome-wide linkage using the Social Responsiveness Scale in Utah autism pedigrees. Mol Autism 1(1):8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Data and Statistics (2018) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (2013) American Psychiatric Pub

  • Didehbani N, Allen T, Kandalaft M, Krawczyk D, Chapman S (2016) Virtual reality social cognition training for children with high functioning autism. Comput Hum Behav 62:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon G, Phelps FG (2005) Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory Cognit 33(4):727–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan WL, Leavitt LA (1980) Physiologic correlates of direct and averted gaze. Biol Psychol 10(3):189–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doughty MJ (2001) Consideration of three types of spontaneous eyeblink activity in normal humans: during reading and video display terminal use, in primary gaze, and while in conversation. Optom Vis Sci 78(10):712–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein MK, Guerra-Carrillo B, Singley ATM, Bunge SA (2017) Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Dev Cognit Neurosci 25:69–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery NJ (2000) The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24(6):581–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Ytter T, Bölte S, Gredebäck G (2013) Eye tracking in early autism research. J Neurodev Disord 5(1):28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gray C (2010) The new social story book. Future Horizons

  • Guestrin ED, Eizenman M (2006) General theory of remote gaze estimation using the pupil center and corneal reflections. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering 53(6):1124–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1996) The hidden dimension. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann SG, Smits JA (2008) Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry 69(4):621

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y, Pavlou P, Wang K, Shi N (2016) On the role of fairness and social distance in designing effective social referral systems. MIS Quarterly, forthcoming; Fox School of Business research paper, no. 16–038

  • Jenkins R, Beaver JD, Calder AJ (2006) I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychol Sci 17(6):506–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinsky SE, Ahlstrom JB, Vaden KI, Cute SL, Humes LE, Dubno JR, Eckert MA (2013) Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology 50(1):23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriakose S, Lahiri U (2015) Understanding the psycho-physiological implications of interaction with a virtual reality-based system in adolescents with autism: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(4):665–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lele A (2013) Virtual reality and its military utility. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 4(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenskiy A, Paprocki R (2016) Blink rate variability during resting and reading sessions. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), pp. 1–6

  • Osmani V, Carreras I, Matic A, Saar P (2014) An analysis of distance estimation to detect proximity in social interactions. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 5(3):297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson ML (1977) Interpersonal distance, affect, and equilibrium theory. J Soc Psychol 101(2):205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peysakhovich V, Causse M, Scannella S, Dehais F (2015) Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. Int J Psychophysiol 97(1):30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sansosti FJ, Powell-Smith KA (2008) Using computer-presented social stories and video models to increase the social communication skills of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. J Posit Behav Interv 10(3):162–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senju A, Johnson MH (2009) Atypical eye contact in autism: models, mechanisms and development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33(8):1204–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibert LE, Jacob RJ (2000) Evaluation of eye gaze interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 281–288, ACM

  • Siegle GJ, Ichikawa N, Steinhauer S (2008) Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 45(5):679–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson GM, Rutter DR (1970) Eye-contact, distance and affiliation: a re-evaluation. Br J Psychol 61(3):385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thönes S, Hecht H (2016) How long did you look at me? The influence of gaze direction on perceived duration and temporal sensitivity. Perception 45(6):612–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch KC, Lahiri U, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2010) An approach to the design of socially acceptable robots for children with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser MJ, Pauli P, Alpers GW, Mühlberger A (2009) Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety?—an eye-tracking and psychophysiology study. J Anxiety Disord 23(1):93–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wang X, Goubran M, Whalen T, Petriu EM (2013) Human emotion and cognition recognition from body language of the head using soft computing techniques. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 4(1):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Sun J, Athukorala K, Wijekoon D, Ylianttila M (2012) Pervasive social computing: augmenting five facets of human intelligence. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 3(2):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Pearl Special Needs Foundation, Ahmedabad, Health and Care Foundation, Ahmedabad and Tanay Foundation, Ahmedabad for helping us in enrolling the participants in our study. Also we thank Cognitive Science Research Initiative under DST, India for partially funding this research. We would also like to express our gratitude to Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, India for offering fellowship support to the researcher under Visvesvaraya PhD Scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Cognitive Science, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India

    Pradeep Raj Krishnappa Babu

  2. Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India

    Uttama Lahiri

Authors
  1. Pradeep Raj Krishnappa Babu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uttama Lahiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Raj Krishnappa Babu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnappa Babu, P.R., Lahiri, U. Understanding the role of Proximity and Eye gaze in human–computer interaction for individuals with autism. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 15, 861–875 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01175-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01175-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation