Abstract
In vivo exposure therapy (IVET) is the treatment of choice for specific phobias, including animal phobia. Recently virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) and Augmented reality exposure therapy (ARET) have been presented and validated as suitable tools, however, to the best of our knowledge, no other work has identified nor provided an explicit classification or taxonomy to classify, compare and even inform the design of these kind of systems. In this work we propose a taxonomy of feedback factors that affect the experience of use of mixed reality systems for small-animal phobias. The taxonomy comprises feedback factors in three categories, namely realism, interaction, and intensity; while considering: auditory, haptic and visual dimensions for each. To illustrate this taxonomy in use, we conducted a survey to compare mixed reality applications for small-animal phobias, analysing their features according to the factors proposed in the taxonomy. In addition, we developed the concept of smart objects of fear by means of a design fiction world. In this world, in addition to IVET, VRET and ARET, where the objects of fear are either real (in the former) or virtual (in the two later), we envision a new kind of mixed reality therapy, where the objects of fear are represented using context-aware smart objects, capable of inferring the emotional state of the patient, and of adapting their behavior to improve the system’s response during the therapy; which in turn, may enrich the patient’s therapy experience. We validated the perceived usability of this design fiction world with an expert in exposure therapy for small-animal phobias, whom perceived it as useful and correct. Finally, we show how the use of the taxonomy allowed us to discuss the features of the proposed future technologies in terms of how they furnish each of the factors of the taxonomy.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agah A (2000) Human interactions with intelligent systems: research taxonomy. Comput Electr Eng 27(1):71–107
Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Bernert S (2004) Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the european study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand 109(420):21–27
Baños RM, Guillen V, Quero S, Garcia-Palacios A, Alcaniz M, Botella C (2011) A virtual reality system for the treatment of stress-related disorders: a preliminary analysis of efficacy compared to a standard cognitive behavioral program. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69(9):602–613
Baus O, Bouchard S (2014) Moving from virtual reality exposure-based therapy to augmented reality exposure-based therapy: a review. Front Human Neurosci 8:112
Blythe M (2014) Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 703–712
Botella CM, Juan MC, Baños RM, Alcañiz M, Guillén V, Rey B (2005) Mixing realities? An application of augmented reality for the treatment of cockroach phobia. Cyberpsychol Behav 8(2):162–171
Botella C, Breton-Lopez J, Quero S, Baños RM, Garcia-Palacios A, Zaragoza I, Alcañiz M (2011) Treating cockroach phobia using a serious game on a mobile phone and augmented reality exposure: a single case study. Comput Hum Behav 27(1):217–227
Botella C, Pérez-Ara MÁ, Breton-Lopez J, Quero S, Garcia-Palacios A, Baños RM (2016) In vivo versus augmented reality exposure in the treatment of small animal phobia: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 11(2):1–23
Botella C, Fernández-Álvarez J, Guillén V, García-Palacios A, Baños R (2017) Recent progress in virtual reality exposure therapy for phobias: a systematic review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 19(7):42
Bouchard S, Côté S, St-Jacques J, Robillard G, Renaud P (2006) Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of arachnophobia using 3D games. Technol Health Care 14(1):19–27
Bouchard S, Dumoulin S, Robillard G, Guitard T, Klinger E, Forget H, Loranger C, Roucaut FX (2017) Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 210(4):276–283
Bretón-López J, Quero S, Botella C, García-Palacios A, Baños RM, Alcañiz M (2010) An augmented reality system validation for the treatment of cockroach phobia. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 13(6):705–710
Cavrag M, Larivière G, Cretu AM, Bouchard S (2014) Interaction with virtual spiders for eliciting disgust in the treatment of phobias. In: IEEE international symposium on haptic, audio and visual environments and games (HAVE) proceedings, pp 29–34
Chin J, Callaghan V, Allouch SB (2019) The internet-of-things: reflections on the past, present and future from a user-centered and smart environment perspective. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 11(1):45–69
Choy Y, Fyer AJ, Lipsitz JD (2007) Treatment of specific phobia in adults. Clin Psychol Rev 27(3):266–286
Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13(1):3–21
Côté S, Bouchard S (2008) Virtual reality exposure for phobias: a critical review. J CyberTher Rehab 1(1):75–91
Coulton P, Lindley J, Cooper R (2018) The little book of design fiction for the internet of things. Lancaster University, Lancaster
Deol KK, Sutcliffe A, Maiden N (1999) Modelling interaction to inform information requirements in virtual environments, pp. 107–114
El Saddik A, Orozco M, Eid M, Cha J (2011) Haptics technologies: bringing touch to multimedia. Springer, Berlin
Foa EB, Kozak MJ (1986) Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychol Bull 99(1):20–35
Hoffman HG, Garcia-Palacios A, Carlin A, Furness Iii TA, Botella-Arbona C (2003) Interfaces that heal: coupling real and virtual objects to treat spider phobia. Int J Human Comput Interact 16(2):283–300
Juan MC, Alcaniz M, Monserrat C, Botella C, Baños RM, Guerrero B (2005) Using augmented reality to treat phobias. In: IEEE computer graphics and applications proceedings, pp 31–37
Juan MC, Joele D (2011) A comparative study of the sense of presence and anxiety in an invisible marker versus a marker augmented reality system for the treatment of phobia towards small animals. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69(6):440–453
Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Wittchen HU (2012) Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 21(3):169–184
Kindt M, Brosschot JF, Muris P (1996) Spider phobia questionnaire for children (SPQ-C): a psychometric study and normative data. Behav Res Ther 34(3):277–282
Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 77(12):1321–1329
Miorandi D, Sicari S, De Pellegrini F, Chlamtac I (2012) Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw 10(7):1497–1516
Mullenbach J, Shultz C, Colgate JE, Piper AM (2014) Exploring affective communication through variable-friction surface haptics. In: ACM Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 3963–3972
Öst LG, Salkovskis PM, Hellström K (1991) One-session therapist-directed exposure vs. self-exposure in the treatment of spider phobia. Behav Ther 22(3):407–422
Ramírez-Fernández C, Morán AL, García-Canseco E, Meza-Kubo V, Barreras E, Valenzuela O, Hernández N (2017) Haptic mobile augmented reality system for the treatment of phobia of small animals in teenagers. In: International conference on ubiquitous computing and ambient intelligence, pp 666–676
Ramírez-Fernández C, Morán AL, Meza-Kubo V (2018) Towards a taxonomy of feedback factors affecting the user experience of augmented reality exposure therapy systems for small-animal phobias. In: 12th international conference on ubiquitous computing and ambient intelligence (UCAmI), vol 2, no 19, pp 1–12
Rich Apps (2018) 4D spider on a hand simulator
Solana J, Cáceres C, García-Molina A, Chausa P, Opisso E, Roig-Rovira T, Menasalvas E, Tormos-Muñoz JM, Gómez EJ (2014) Intelligent therapy assistant (ITA) for cognitive rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 14(1):1–14
Suso-Ribera C, Fernández-Álvarez J, García-Palacios A, Hoffman HG, Bretón-López J, Banos RM, Quero S, Botella C (2019) Virtual reality, augmented reality, and in vivo exposure therapy: a preliminary comparison of treatment efficacy in small animal phobia. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 22(1):31–38
Twiz (2017) Spider phobia
Vitense HS, Jacko JA, Emery VK (2003) Multimodal feedback: an assessment of performance and mental workload. Ergonomics 46(1–3):68–87
Wrzesien M, Burkhardt JM, Alcañiz M, Botella C (2011) How technology influences the therapeutic process: a comparative field evaluation of augmented reality and in vivo exposure therapy for phobia of small animals. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), pp 523–540
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Psychologist Manuel Hernández Saijas, of the Centro de Rehabilitación Integral de Ensenada (CRI), for his advice, support and discussions on the conception, revision and validation of the taxonomy and the design fiction world proposed. This research was partially funded by UABC under grant 0239 of the 21a Convocatoria Interna de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación and Proyecto TecNM under grant 6798.19-P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morán, A.L., Ramírez-Fernández, C. & Meza-Kubo, V. Design of smart objects of fear with a taxonomy of factors affecting the user experience of exposure therapy systems for small-animal phobias. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 13, 5363–5375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01802-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01802-9