Abstract
In automotive field, the term Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is a sub-application of Internet of Things (IoT).The communication scenario of IoV usually changes in the space-time dimension. Unfortunately, vehicles can not select the optimal routing policy when facing the dynamic environment. Thus, in this paper, we present a V2X Communication protocol based on Nakagami-m Outage Probability (VCNOP) to improve Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Average-End-to-End-Delay (AE2ED). We consider Road-Side-Units (RSU)-assisted communication system to help find the best routing path, and the outage probability to measure the impact of the physical layer on routing protocol. Meanwhile, the dynamic broadcasting mechanism considering the various vehicle velocity and density are applied to increase the accuracy of routing decisions. We utilize vehicle flow model combining realistic Harbin map by SUMO to provision a realistic scenario. Following this, simulation results in NS3 show the advantage of VCNOP compared with other protocols in terms of PDR and AE2ED.














Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Outage probability is that the link capacity cannot meet the required user rate, and an outage event will occur.
References
Arslan H (2020) A parallel fully dynamic iterative bio-inspired shortest path algorithm. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04606-3
Aslam B, Amjad F, Zou CC (2012) Optimal roadside units placement in urban areas for vehicular networks. Computers and Communications (ISCC). IEEE Symposium on, IEEE, pp 000423–000429
Bagherlou H, Ghaffari A (2018) A routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks using simulated annealing algorithm and neural networks. J Supercomput 74:2528–2552
Barrachina J, Garrido P, Fogue M, Martinez FJ, Cano JC, Calafate CT, Manzoni P (2013) Road side unit deployment: a density-based approach. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 5(3):30–39
Behrisch M, Bieker L, Erdmann J, Krajzewicz D (2011) Sumo–simulation of urban mobility: an overview. In: Proceedings of SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, ThinkMind
Belmekki BEY, Abdelkrim H, Escrig B (2019a) Cooperative vehicular communications at intersections over nakagami-m fading channels. Veh Commun 19:100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100165
Belmekki BEY, Hamza A, Escrig B (2019b) Cooperative vehicular communications at intersections over Nakagami-m fading channels. Veh Commun 19:100165
Belmekki BEY, Hamza A, Escrig B (2020a) On the performance of 5g non-orthogonal multiple access for vehicular communications at road intersections. Veh Commun 22:100202
Belmekki BEY, Hamza A, Escrig B (2020b) Performance analysis of cooperative noma at intersections for vehicular communications in the presence of interference. Ad hoc Netw 98:102036
Bilal S, Madani SA, Khan I (2011) Enhanced junction selection mechanism for routing protocol in vanets. Int Arab J Inform Technol 8(4):422–429
Chen Y, Xiang Z, Jian W, Jiang W (2010) An adaptive cross-layer multi-path routing protocol for urban vanet. In: Automation and Logistics (ICAL), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp 603–608
Fonseca A, Vazão T (2013) Applicability of position-based routing for vanet in highways and urban environment. J Netw Comput Appl 36(3):961–973
Ghaffari A (2019) Hybrid opportunistic and position-based routing protocol in vehicular ad hoc networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:1593–1603
Ghiasi A, Li X, Ma J (2019) A mixed traffic speed harmonization model with connected autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C 104:210–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.005
Glass S, Mahgoub I, Rathod M (2017) Rapid prototyping of cooperative caching in a vanet: a case study. Wireless Days. https://doi.org/10.1109/WD.2017.7918144
Goudarzi F, Asgari H, Al-Raweshidy HS (2019) Traffic-aware vanet routing for city environmentsa protocol based on ant colony optimization. IEEE Syst J 13(1):571–581. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2018.2806996
Goyal P (2012) Simulation study of comparative performance of aodv, olsr, fsr & lar, routing protocols in manet in large scale scenarios. Information and Communication Technologies (WICT). World Congress on, IEEE, pp 283–286
Gu Z, Zhang J, Ji Y (2019) Topology optimizing in fso-based uavs relay networks for resilience enhancement. Mob Netw Appl 5:1–13
Hassanabadi B, Valaee S (2014) Reliable periodic safety message broadcasting in vanets using network coding. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 13(3):1284–1297
Huang Y, Guan X, Cai Z, Ohtsuki T (2013) Multicast capacity analysis for social-proximity urban bus-assisted vanets. In: Communications (ICC), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp 6138–6142
Jerbi M, Meraihi R, Senouci SM, Ghamri-Doudane Y (2006) Gytar: improved greedy traffic aware routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks, ACM, pp 88–89
Johnson DB, Maltz DA, Broch J et al (2001) Dsr: the dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks. Ad hoc Netw 5:139–172
Karnadi FK, Mo ZH, Kc Lan (2007) Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for vanet. In: Wireless Communications, and Networking Conference, (2007) WCNC 2007. IEEE, IEEE, pp 2506–2511
Karp B, Kung HT (2000) Gpsr: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM, pp 243–254
Kouka K, Krichen L (2019) Energy management strategy of a photovoltaic electric vehicle charging station. Int Conf Sci Tech Autom Control Comput Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2019.8717285
Lan KC, Wu ZM (2008) On the feasibility of using public transport as data mules for traffic monitoring. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, IEEE, pp 979–984
Liang Y, Liu H, Rajan D (2012) Optimal placement and configuration of roadside units in vehicular networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2012 IEEE 75th, IEEE, pp 1–6
Lochert C, Hartenstein H, Tian J, Fussler H, Hermann D, Mauve M (2003) A routing strategy for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, IEEE, pp 156–161
Menouar H, Lenardi M, Filali F (2007) Movement prediction-based routing (mopr) concept for position-based routing in vehicular networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. 2007 IEEE 66th, IEEE, pp 2101–2105
Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (dsdv) for mobile computers. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 24:234–244
Rehman SU, Khan MA, Zia TA (2014) Cross layer routing for vanets. World of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–4
Saraswat D, Chaurasia BK (2013) Ahp based trust model in vanets. In: International Conference and Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, pp 391–393
Shafi S, Bhandari BN, Ratnam DV (2016) An improved cross layer cooperative routing for vehicular networks. In: International Conference on Research Advances in Integrated Navigation Systems, pp 1–4
Taleb T, Ochi M, Jamalipour A, Kato N (2006) An efficient vehicle-heading based routing protocol for vanet networks. In: Wireless Communications and NETWORKING Conference, 2006. WCNC, pp 2199–2204
ur Rehman S, Khan MA, Imran M, Zia TA, Iftikhar M (2017) Enhancing quality-of-service conditions using a cross-layer paradigm for ad-hoc vehicular communication. IEEE Access 5:12404–12416. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2717501
Wang Q, Fan P, Letaief KB (2012) On the joint v2i and v2v scheduling for cooperative vanets with network coding. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(1):62–73
Wang T, Wang Y, Liu B, Wang X, Zhang J, Hussain A, Wang P, Cao Y (2018) A novel cross-layer communication protocol for vehicular sensor networks. Int J Commun Syst 31(7):e3406
Wang T, Hussain A, Bhutta MNM, Cao Y (2019a) Enabling bidirectional traffic mobility for its simulation in smart city environments. Fut Gener Comput Syst 92:342–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.10.015
Wang T, Tang M, Song H, Cao Y, Khan Z (2019b) Opportunistic protocol based on social probability and resources efficiency for the intelligent and connected transportation system. Comput Netw 149:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.11.034
Wigren T, Johansson K, Lamm A, Persson M, Savolainen L (2015) Slow congestion control. US Patent 9,220,071
Wu TJ, Liao W, Chang CJ (2012) A cost-effective strategy for road-side unit placement in vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Commun 60(8):2295–2303
Wu TY, Obaidat MS, Chan HL (2015) Qualityscan scheme for load balancing efficiency in vehicular ad hoc networks (vanets). J Syst Softw 104:60–68
Xu Y, Wu Y, Xu J, Sun L (2012) Efficient detection scheme for urban traffic congestion using buses. In: Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2012 26th International Conference on, IEEE, pp 287–293
Yi J, Adnane A, David S, Parrein B (2011) Multipath optimized link state routing for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad hoc Netw 9(1):28–47
Zhang Y, Zhao J, Cao G (2010) Service scheduling of vehicle-roadside data access. Mob Netw Appl 15(1):83–96
Zhang R, Cheng X, Yang L (2019) Flexible energy management protocol for cooperative ev-to-ev charging. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20(1):172–184. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2807184
Zhou X, Fu W (2019) A multi-agent simulation method of urban land layout structure based on fpga. Mob Netw Appl 5:1–10
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation(61102105, 51779050), The Harbin Science Fund for Young Reserve Talents (No. 2017RAQXJ036), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HEUCFG201831)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Design and performance evaluation of V2X communication protocol based on Nakagami-m outage probability. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 12, 9405–9421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02661-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02661-0