Abstract
Multilevel programming is a mathematical programming problem with hierarchical structure. A typical feature of multilevel programming is that the upper level exhibits a priority over the lower level. However, the solutions obtained by most existing programming methods either violate this rule or ignore the participants’ desire for a win–win outcome. The objective of this study is to propose new multilevel programming approaches for obtaining desirable solutions. First, three types of membership functions in neutrosophic set are defined to comprehensively describe fuzzy cognition of decision makers. Then, considering dissimilar intentions of experts, three different interactive approaches are proposed to solve multilevel programming problems. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approaches, a case of pricing decision-making of data products is investigated and the impacts of four key parameters are discussed. Finally, several numerical examples are studied by using the proposed approaches and other existing methods. Two evaluation indexes, the equilibrium coefficient and distance measure, are utilized to appraise the performance of the developed programming methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed approaches can obtain sound solutions which obey the rule of multilevel programming, realize the mutual benefits of participants, and can provide guidelines for the pricing of satellite image data products.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abdel-Basset M, Gunasekaran M, Mohamed M, Smarandache F (2019) A novel method for solving the fully neutrosophic linear programming problems. Neural Comput Appl 31(5):1595–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3404-6
Alavidoost MH, Babazadeh H, Sayyari ST (2016) An interactive fuzzy programming approach for bi-objective straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. Appl Soft Comput 40:221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.025
Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.167
Arora SR, Gupta R (2009) Interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for bilevel programming problem. Eur J Oper Res 194(2):368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.019
Awathankar RV, Rukmini MSS, Raut RD (2020) To mitigate with trusted channel selection using MOORA algorithm in cognitive radio network. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-020-00382-w
Bard JF, Falk JE (1982) An explicit solution to the multi-level programming problem. Comput Oper Res 9(1):77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(82)90007-7
Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Bialas WF, Karwan MH (1984) Two-level linear programming. Manag Sci 30(8):1004–1020. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.8.1004
Brauers WK, Zavadskas EK (2006) The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybern 35(2):445–469. http://eudml.org/doc/209425. Accessed 8 Feb 2021
Çalık A, Pehlivan NY, Paksoy T, Weber GW (2018) A novel interactive fuzzy programming approach for optimization of allied closed-loop supply chains. Int J Comput Int Sys 11(1):672–691. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.11.1.52
Chai R, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A, Xia Y (2017) An interactive fuzzy physical programming for solving multiobjective skip entry problem. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 53(5):2385–2398. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2696281
Dalman H, Bayram M (2019) Interactive goal programming algorithm with Taylor series and interval type 2 fuzzy numbers. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(6):1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0835-4
Doan LTT, Amer Y, Lee SH, Phuc PNK, Dat LQ (2019) A comprehensive reverse supply chain model using an interactive fuzzy approach—a case study on the Vietnamese electronics industry. Appl Math Model 76:87–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.06.003
Garai A, Roy MP, TK, (2016) Interactive intuitionistic fuzzy technique in multi-objective optimisation. Int J Fuzzy Comput Model 2(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFCM.2016.077872
Ghoushchi SJ, Yousefi S, Khazaeili M (2019) An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Appl Soft Comput 81:105505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105505
Gümüş ZH, Floudas CA (2001) Global optimization of nonlinear bilevel programming problems. J Glob Optim 20(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011268113791
Gupta M, Bhattacharjee D (2012) Two weighted fuzzy goal programming methods to solve multiobjective goal programming problem. J Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/796028
Huang C, Fang D, Wan Z (2015) An interactive intuitionistic fuzzy method for multilevel linear programming problems. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 20(2):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-015-1068-y
Kolstad CD, Lasdon LS (1990) Derivative evaluation and computational experience with large bilevel mathematical programs. J Optim Theory Appl 65(3):485–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939562
Liang Q, Mendel JM (2000) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(5):535–550. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.873577
Liu B (1998) Stackelberg–Nash equilibrium for multilevel programming with multiple followers using genetic algorithms. Comput Math Appl 36(7):79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(98)00174-6
Lu S, Zhu L, Wang Y, Xie L, Su H (2020) Integrated forward and reverse logistics network design for a hybrid assembly-recycling system under uncertain return and waste flows: a fuzzy multi-objective programming. J Clean Prod 243:118591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118591
Luo SZ, Pedrycz W, Xing LN (2021) Pricing of satellite image data products: neutrosophic fuzzy pricing approaches under different game scenarios. Appl Soft Comput 102:107106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107106
Mahmoudi A, Deng X, Javed SA, Yuan J (2020) Large-scale multiple criteria decision-making with missing values: project selection through TOPSIS-OPA. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02649-w
Maiti I, Mandal T, Pramanik S (2019) Neutrosophic goal programming strategy for multi-level multi-objective linear programming problem J. Ambient Intell Hum Comput 11(8):3175–3186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01482-0
Mohamed RH (1997) The relationship between goal programming and fuzzy programming. Fuzzy Set Syst 89(2):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00100-5
Mohammadzadeh A, Kayacan E (2019) A non-singleton type-2 fuzzy neural network with adaptive secondary membership for high dimensional applications. Neurocomputing 338:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.095
Mohammadzadeh A, Kaynak O (2019) A novel general type-2 fuzzy controller for fractional-order multi-agent systems under unknown time-varying topology. J Frankl Inst 356(10):5151–5171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.05.006
Moore JT, Bard JF (1990) The mixed integer linear bilevel programming problem. Oper Res 38(5):911–921. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.5.911
Raju SS, Murali GB, Patnaik PK (2020) Ranking of Al-CSA composite by MCDM approach using AHP-TOPSIS and MOORA methods. J Reinf Plast Comput 39:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420924833
Rani P, Mishra AR, Mardani A, Cavallaro F, Alrasheedi M, Alrashidi A (2020) A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection. J Clean Prod 257:120352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120352
Razmi J, Jafarian E, Amin SH (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy goal programming approach for finding pareto-optimal solutions to multi-objective programming problems. Expert Syst Appl 65:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.048
Sakawa M, Yano H, Yumine T (1987) An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective linear-programming problems and its application. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 17(4):654–661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1987.289356
Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth
Stackelberg HV (1935) Marktform und gleichgewicht. Econ J 45(178):334–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224643
Tang H, Shi Y, Dong P (2019) Public blockchain evaluation using entropy and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 117:204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.048
Wan Z, Wang G, Hou K (2008) An interactive fuzzy decision making method for a class of bilevel programming. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, vol 1, pp 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2008.537
Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang Y, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413
Wang Y, Li Z, Guo S, Zhang F, Guo P (2020) A risk-based fuzzy boundary interval two-stage stochastic water resources management programming approach under uncertainty. J Hydrol 582:124553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124553
White DJ (1997) Penalty function approach to linear trilevel programming. J Optim Theory Appl 93(1):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022610103712
Wu GH, Chang CK, Hsu LM (2018) Comparisons of interactive fuzzy programming approaches for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 125:500–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.022
Yazdi M (2018) Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Safety Sci 110:438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005
Yu W, Zhang Z, Zhong Q (2019) Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03432-7
Zhang Z, Gao Y, Li Z (2020a) Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence. Knowl Based Syst 204:106240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240
Zhang Z, Kou X, Yu W, Gao Y (2020b) Consistency improvement for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence: an application in two-sided matching decision making. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1748529
Zhao X, Zheng Y, Wan Z (2017) Interactive intuitionistic fuzzy methods for multilevel programming problems. Expert Syst Appl 72:258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.063
Zheng Y, Liu J, Wan Z (2014) Interactive fuzzy decision making method for solving bilevel programming problem. Appl Math Model 38(13):3136–3141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.008
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Hunan Province (CX20190045), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773120). The first author is supported by China Scholarship Council (201903170185).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SL, WP and LX conceived and worked together to achieve this work, SL wrote the paper, WP revised the paper, and LX made contribution to the case study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, S., Pedrycz, W. & Xing, L. Interactive multilevel programming approaches in neutrosophic environments. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 13, 2143–2159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02975-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02975-7