Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Nash equilibrium based decision-making method for performance evaluation: a case study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In organizational management, selecting the most appropriate combination of balanced scorecard (BSC) indicators as an equilibrium point based on scientific methods is of great value. In this paper, a new approach based on the balanced scorecard and game theory has been developed for evaluating the performance of an Iranian company to determine the most appropriate combination of BSC indicators and to build an equilibrium point between financial and non-financial performance measures. The organization’s strategic objectives have been translated into a set of performance measures distributed among four perspectives of financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Considering each perspective of BSC as a player in a four-person cooperative game, a bi-objective mathematical model of a finite-discrete game in normal form, based on the Nash solution, is proposed to specify the relationship among indicators in the strategy map, to determine the equilibrium points in the BSC, and to control the organizational costs. The results suggest that the proposed model successfully determines the best combination of indicators, and an equilibrium point in the BSC to minimize the costs and maximize perspectives’ payoff of the BSC without undertaking complicated mathematical computation. Adoption of four indicators of generating new R&D activities, consistency of the working team, growing satisfaction of existing customers, and potential growth in operating income by four players was suggested as the best combination of BSC indicators as an equilibrium point. The proposed model was validated using the Taguchi method to prove that it has been accurate and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aliakbari Nouri F, Shafiei Nikabadi M, Olfat L (2019) Developing the framework of sustainable service supply chain balanced scorecard (SSSC BSC). Int J Product Perform Manag 68(1):148–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amado CAF, Santos SP, Marques PM (2012) Integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega 40(3):390–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arash A, Samuel Y (2018) An integrated Taguchi loss function-fuzzy cognitive map-MCGP with utility function approach for supplier selection problem. Neural Comput Appl 31:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnabè F, Busco C (2012) The causal relationships between performance drivers and outcomes: reinforcing balanced scorecards’ implementation through system dynamics models. J Account Organ Change. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911211273518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso A, Casarin F, Funari S (2018) How well is the museum performing? A joint use of DEA and BSC to measure the performance of museums. Omega 81:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénet N, Deville A, Naro G (2019) BSC inside a strategic management control package. J Appl Acc Res 20(1):120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer PC, Speh TW (2001) Adapting the balanced scorecard to supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Rev 5(2):48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttigieg SC, Dey PK, Cassar MR (2016) Combined quality function deployment and logical framework analysis to improve quality of emergency care in Malta. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2014-0040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun H-S, Lee S-H (2017) Design of a piston forging process using a hybrid Taguchi method and multiple criteria decision-making. J Mech Sci Technol 31(4):1869–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson K, Pressnail KD (2018) Value impacts of energy efficiency retrofits on commercial office buildings in Toronto, Canada. Energy Build 162:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-C, Chen H-Y (2014) Optimizing product form attractiveness using Taguchi method and TOPSIS algorithm: a case study involving a passenger car. Concurr Eng 22(2):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavoshlou AS, Khamseh AA, Naderi B (2019) An optimization model of three-player payoff based on fuzzy game theory in green supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 128:782–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S-S, Lin C-Y, Tsai Y-C (2018) New product strategies and firm performance: CEO optimism. Int Rev Econ Finance. 55:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L et al (2019a) A game-theoretic approach for channel security against active time-varying attacks based on artificial noise. J Ambient Intell Human Comput, pp 1–10

  • Chen Y-S et al (2019b) A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(7):2669–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou S-Y, Chang Y-H, Shen C-Y (2008) A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):132–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chytas P, Glykas M, Valiris G (2011) A proactive balanced scorecard. Int J Inf Manag 31(5):460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui AS, Wu F (2016) Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. J Acad Mark Sci 44(4):516–538

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer H, Yuksel S (2019) Balanced scorecard-based analysis of investment decisions for the renewable energy alternatives: a comparative analysis based on the hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach. Energy 175:1259–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer H, Yüksel S, Martinez L (2019) Balanced scorecard-based analysis about european energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment. Expert Syst Appl 115:152–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do TX et al (2018) Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production. Renew Energy 119:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici G (2011) Game theory as a marketing tool: uses and limitations. Gandolfo Dominici/elixir Mark 36:3524–3528

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgammal A et al (2017) Design for customization: a new paradigm for product-service system development. Procedia Cirp 64:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskafi S, Roghanian E, Jafari-Eskandari M (2015) Designing a performance measurement system for supply chain using balanced scorecard, path analysis, cooperative game theory and evolutionary game theory: A Case Study. Int J Ind Eng Comput 6(2):157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari M, Jalali-Naiini SGH, Aliahmadi AR, Sadjadi SJ (2010) Conceptual model of knowledge management performance evaluation based on the balanced scorecard and game theory in terms of uncertainty (Case Study: South Oil Company). J Appl Environ Biol Sci 5:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel S, Haftor DM, Pashkevich N (2016) Salesforce management factors for successful new product launch. J Bus Res 69(11):5053–5058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman JE, Ahuja S (2009) Integration of COBIT, balanced scorecard & SSE-CMM as a strategic information security management (ISM) framework. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Information Security Symposium. CERIAS-Purdue University, p 19

  • Grimpe C, Sofka W, Bhargava M, Chatterjee R (2017) R&D, marketing innovation, and new product performance: a mixed methods study. J Prod Innov Manag 34(3):360–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Hyun SS (2015) Customer retention in the medical tourism industry: impact of quality, satisfaction, trust, and price reasonableness. Tour Manag 46:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashem O, Arash A, Ali E (2018) Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: a multi response taguchi-neural network using topsis and fuzzy best-worst method. J Clean Prod 203:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández E, Barrientos A, Del Cerro J (2014) Selective Smooth Fictitious Play: an approach based on game theory for patrolling infrastructures with a multi-robot system. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):2897–2913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho L-H, Feng S-Y, Yen T-M (2014) A new methodology for customer satisfaction analysis: Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratio approach. J Serv Sci Manag

  • Homburg C et al (2017) The contingent roles of R&D–sales versus R&D–marketing cooperation in new-product development of business-to-business firms. Int J Res Mark 34(1):212–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HC (2009) Designing a knowledge-based system for strategic planning: a balanced scorecard perspective. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ic YT, Yildirim S (2012) Improvement of a product design using multi criteria decision making methods with Taguchi method. J Fac Eng Arch Gazi Univ 27(2):447–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajtazi M, Holmberg N (2019) IS education revisited: reflections on a BSc program in business information systems design. In: 2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). IEEE, pp 144–149

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balance scorecard–Measures that drive performance Harvard Business Review Jan-Feb. In: Materials of reports made at the international scientific-practical conference held at Paata Gugushvili Institute of Economics of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University in 2011 (Vol. 70, No. 1, p. 322)

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy Leader 24(5):18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Focusing your organization on strategy-with the balanced scorecard. Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laraki R, Renault J, Sorin S (2019) Mathematical foundations of game theory. Springer

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laury HA, Matondang N, Sembiring MT (2020) Balanced scorecard in the integration of corporate strategic planning and performance: a literature review. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, p 12135

  • Lee E, Seo Y-D, Kim Y-G (2019) A Nash equilibrium based decision-making method for internet of things. J Ambient Intell Human Comput, pp 1–9

  • Li Y, Liang L (2010) A Shapley value index on the importance of variables in DEA models. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6287–6292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y et al (2019) Allocating the fixed cost: an approach based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game. Ann Oper Res 274(1–2):373–394

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas WF (1972) An overview of the mathematical theory of games. Manag Sci INFORMS 18(5-part-2):3–19

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marchioni A, Magni CA (2018) Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return. Eur J Oper Res 268(1):361–372

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Alonzo J, Zayas-Castro J, Charkhgard H (2019) ‘Office-based and home-care for older adults in primary care: A comparative analysis using the Nash bargaining solution’, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak M, Ghosh KK, Pathak K (2018) A BSC-ANP approach to organizational outsourcing decision support—a case study. J Bus Res 103:432–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Naini SGJ, Aliahmadi AR, Jafari-Eskandari M (2011) Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: a case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(6):593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan A et al (2019) Feasibility of 100% renewable energy-based electricity production for cities with storage and flexibility. Renew Energy 134:698–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci 36(1):48–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1951) 19.96. Essays on game theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kindom

    Google Scholar 

  • Omrani H, Alizadeh A, Emrouznejad A (2018) Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: a multi response Taguchi-neural network using TOPSIS and fuzzy best-worst method. J Clean Prod 203:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osiro L, Lima-Junior FR, Carpinetti LCR (2018) A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. J Clean Prod 183:964–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley D (1999) Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Manag Account Res 10(4):363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakizehkar H et al (2016) The application of integration of Kano’s model, AHP technique and QFD matrix in prioritizing the bank’s substructions. Proc Soc Behav Sci 230:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey RK, Panda SS (2015) Multi-performance optimization of bone drilling using Taguchi method based on membership function. Measurement 59:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Vanzeveren E (2015) Adoption and use of flash profiling in daily new product development: a testimonial. In: Rapid sensory profiling techniques. Elsevier, pp 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422587.3.335

  • Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2000) The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Harvard Business Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad S, Shankar R, Roy S (2019) Impact of bargaining power on supply chain profit allocation: a game-theoretic study. J Adv Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-10-2018-0096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo AB, Sutanto J (2019) Analysis for developing a clearing house of nuclear technology using SWOT-BSC strategies. J Phys Conf Ser 22:11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1198/2/022011/meta

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quezada LE, López-Ospina HA (2014) A method for designing a strategy map using AHP and linear programming. Int J Prod Econ 158:244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safari G, Hafezalkotob A, Khalilzadeh M (2018) A Nash bargaining model for flow shop scheduling problem under uncertainty: a case study from tire manufacturing in Iran. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salavati M, Abdi F, TeymoorPayandeh A (2015) A structural equation modelling to investigate and analyze the relationships among new product development, disruptive innovation, fuzzy-front end, knowledge management, and team vision. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 3(2):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK et al (2015) An ANFIS approach for evaluation of team-level service climate in GSD projects using Taguchi-genetic learning algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 30:628–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK et al (2020) Robust optimization and mixed-integer linear programming model for LNG supply chain planning problem. Soft Comput 24(11):7885–7905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan H, Yang K, Shi J (2019) A strategic perspective analysis for improving operational inefficiency of e-commerce based on integrated BSC and super-SBM model. In: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on management engineering, software engineering and service sciences. ACM, pp 128–134

  • Sharma S, Balan S (2013) An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming. J Intell Manuf 24(6):1123–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shojaei P, Haeri SAS, Mohammadi S (2018) Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique. J Air Transp Manag 68:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn MH et al (2003) Corporate strategies, environmental forces, and performance measures: a weighting decision support system using the k-nearest neighbor technique. Expert Syst Appl 25(3):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutono SB et al (2016) Fuzzy-based Taguchi method for multi-response optimization of product form design in Kansei engineering: a case study on car form design. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf. 10(9):JAMDSM0108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G, Konishi S (1991) Signal-to-noise ratio for quality evaluation. ASI Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang M, Wang T-D, Peng D-H (2020) An improved Taguchi multi-criteria decision-making method based on the hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its application in quality evaluation. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02558-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M et al (2019) Game theory modelling of retail marketing discount strategies. Mark Intell Plan. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2018-0489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A (2015) Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy—a review. J Clean Prod 97:76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchia P et al (2019) Application of game theory and evolutionary algorithm to the regional turboprop aircraft wing optimization. In: Evolutionary and deterministic methods for design optimization and control with applications to industrial and societal problems. Springer, pp 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_26

  • Wang M (2018) A KPI-based approach to performance-oriented workplace e-learning. In: E-Learning in the workplace. Springer, pp 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64532-2_10.

  • Wang M, Li Y (2014) Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model. Expert Syst Appl 41(9):4181–4185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood LC et al (2016) Green hospital design: integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands. J Clean Prod 112:903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaohui N et al (2014) Predicting the protein solubility by integrating chaos games representation and entropy in information theory. Expert Syst Appl 41(4):1672–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Wen Y-F, Wang F-F (2011) Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making method. Int J Prod Econ 134(2):458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J et al (2018) A bayesian game approach for noncooperative pricing among multiple utility companies in smart grid. IEEE Access 6:68576–68585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel İ, Dağdeviren M (2010) Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): a case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1270–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H et al (2018) A game-theoretic strategic mechanism to control brand counterfeiting. Mark Intell Plan 36(5):585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L et al (2018) Performance changes analysis of industrial enterprises under energy constraints. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Amirhossein Karimpoor, Maryam Hejazy, Dr. Mohsen Alizadeh Bidgoli, the Editor in chief of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Review, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions, as results the paper has been improved substantially.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

    Mansour Abedian & Atefeh Amindoust

  2. Department of Mathematics, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

    Reza Maddahi

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Golpayegan University of Technology, Golpayegan, Iran

    Javid Jouzdani

Authors
  1. Mansour Abedian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Atefeh Amindoust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Maddahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javid Jouzdani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atefeh Amindoust.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abedian, M., Amindoust, A., Maddahi, R. et al. A Nash equilibrium based decision-making method for performance evaluation: a case study. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 13, 5563–5579 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03188-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation