Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Discovering the discovery of the No-Search Approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No-Search Approach is a component of Linguistic Geometry (LG), a type of game theory for extensive discrete games scalable to the level of real life defense systems. LG is a formal model of human reasoning about armed conflict, a mental reality “hard-wired” in the human brain. LG, an evolutionary product of millions of years of human warfare, must be a component of the Primary Language of the human brain (as introduced by J. Von Neumann). Experiences of development of LG must be instructive for solving another major puzzle, discovering the algorithm of discovery, yet another ancient component of the Primary Language. This paper reports results on discovering mental processes involved in the development of the major result in LG, the No-Search Approach. Those mental processes manifesting execution of the algorithm of discovery are called visual streams. It seems that those streams are the only interface of the algorithm of discovery. This paper demonstrates a typical situation in discoveries in mathematics and computer science when the original result (an idea) has been envisioned via one type of semi-formal visual streams and later proved via different streams that involve formal mathematical theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Botvinnik M (1968) Algoritm igry v Shakhmaty (Algorithm for playing chess). Nauka, Moscow (in Russian). Translated into English: Botvinnik M (1970) Chess, computers, and log-range planning. Springer, Berlin

  2. Botvinnik M (1984) Computers in chess: solving inexact search problems. Springer, Berlin

  3. Brown J (2011) the laboratory of the mind: through experiments in the natural sciences, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deheaene S (2007) A few steps toward a science of mental life. Mind Brain Education 1(1):28–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deheaene S (2009) Edge in Paris. In: Talk at the reality club: signatures of consciousness. http://edge.org/3rd_culture/dehaene09/dehaene09_index.html.

  6. Einstein A (1991) Autobiographical notes. Open Court, La Salle

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gleick J (1992) Genius: the life and science of Richard Feynman. Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, New York

  8. Hadamard J (1996) The mathematician’s mind: the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kosslyn S, Thompson W, Kim I, Alpert N (1995) Representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature 378:496–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kott A (ed) (2004) Advanced technology concepts for command and control. Xlibris Corporation, USA

  11. Kott A, McEneaney W (eds) Adversarial reasoning: computational approaches to reading the opponent’s mind. Chapman & Hall/CRC, West Palm Beach

  12. Nasar S (2001) A beautiful mind. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linguistic Geometry Tools: LG-PACKAGE, with Demo DVD, 60 pp, STILMAN Advanced Strategies (2010) This brochure and 8 recorded demonstrations. http://www.stilman-strategies.com.

  14. Miller A (1996) Insights of genius: imagery and creativity in science and art, Copernicus. Springer, Berlin

  15. Nersessian N. Conceptual change: creativity, cognition, and culture. In: Meheus J, Nicles T (ed) Models of discovery and creativity, Springer, Berlin, pp 127–166

  16. Stilman B (1975) Formation of the set of trajectory bundles, appendix 1. In: Botvinnik MM (ed) On the cybernetic goal of games. Soviet Radio, Moscow, pp 70–77 (in Russian)

  17. Stilman B (1993) A formal language for hierarchical systems control. Int J Lang Des 1(4):333–356

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stilman B (1993) A linguistic approach to geometric reasoning. Int J Comput Math Appl 26(7):29–58

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stilman B (1993) Network languages for complex systems. Int J Comput Math Appl 26(8):51–80

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stilman B (1994) Linguistic geometry for control systems design. Int J Comput Appl 1(2):89–110

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stilman B (1994) Translations of network languages. Int J Comput Math Appl 27(2):65–98

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stilman B (1997) Managing search complexity in linguistic geometry. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics 27(6):978–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stilman B (1997) Network languages for concurrent multi-agent systems. Intl J Comput Math Appl 34(1):103–136

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stilman B (2000) Linguistic geometry: from search to construction. Kluwer Academic Publishers (now Springer), Dordrecht

  25. Stilman B (2011) Linguistic geometry and evolution of intelligence. ISAST Trans Comput Intell Syst 3(2):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stilman B (2011) Thought experiments in linguistic geometry. In: Proc. of the 3d int. conf on advanced cognitive technologies and applications—COGNITIVE’2011, Sep. 25–30, 2011, pp 77–83, Rome

  27. Stilman B (2012) Discovering the discovery of linguistic geometry. Int J Machine Learn Cybern (accepted for publication)

  28. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2000) Winning strategies for robotic wars: defense applications of linguistic geometry. Artif Life Robot 4(3)

  29. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2002) Knowledge acquisition and strategy generation with LG wargaming tools. Int J Comput Intell Appl 2(4):385–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2007) Chapter 3.3. Strategies in large scale problems, in [11], pp 251–285

  31. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2010) Linguistic geometry: the age of maturity. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Informa 14(6):684–699

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2010) Revisiting history with linguistic geometry. ISAST Trans Comput Intell Syst 2(2):22–38

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2011) The Primary Language of ancient battles. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2(3):157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ulam S (1976) Adventures of a mathematician. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Volchenkov N (1979) Interpretator beskontekstnikh upravliaemikh parametricheskikh programmnikh grammatik (Interpreter of context-free controlled programmed grammars with parameters) in Voprosy Kibernetiky: Intellektualnie banky dannikh (Proc. on cybernetics: intelligent data banks). USSR Academy of Sciences, Sci. Board on Complex Problem Cybernetics, pp 147–157 (in Russian)

  36. Von Neumann J (1958) The computer and the brain. Yale University Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Watson J (1998) The double helix. Scribner Classics, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Stilman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stilman, B. Discovering the discovery of the No-Search Approach. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 5, 165–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-012-0127-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-012-0127-3

Keywords