Skip to main content
Log in

A rule-extraction framework under multigranulation rough sets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multigranulation rough set (MGRS) is becoming a rising theory in rough set area, which offers a desirable theoretical method for problem solving under multigranulation environment. However, it is worth noticing that how to effectively extract decision rules in terms of multigranulation rough sets has not been more concerned. In order to address this issue, we firstly give a general rule-extraction framework through including granulation selection and granule selection in the context of MGRS. Then, two methods in the framework (i.e. a granulation selection method that employs a heuristic strategy for searching a minimal set of granular structures and a granule selection method constructed by an optimistic strategy for getting a set of granules with maximal covering property) are both presented. Finally, an experimental analysis shows the validity of the proposed rule-extraction framework in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The generalization is an important index of depicting classifier performance. In our study, we only discuss the lower approximation reduction. If we want to analyze the generalization of extracted rules in detail, we should take the upper approximation into account and design the corresponding multigranulation rough classifier. However, describing these contents in detail is beyond the scope of this paper. We will focus on the studies of the multigranulation rough classifier and its generalization in the future work.

  2. The granulation selection in terms of MGRS is based on the model of multigranulation rough sets, which keeps the positive region in MGRS unchanged (i.e. the definition of approximation quality is based on multigranulation rough sets theory). The proposed granulation selection is different from the attribute reduction in terms of rough set.

References

  1. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets. Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, system theory, knowledge engineering and problem solving, vol 9, Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang FY (1998) Outline of a computational theory for linguistic dynamic systems: toward computing with words. Int J Intell Control Syst 2(2):211–224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang FY (2005) On the abstraction of conventional dynamic systems: from numerical analysis to linguistic analysis. Inf Sci 171(1–3):233–259

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziarko W (1993) Variable precision rough sets model. J Comput Syst Sci 46(1):39–59

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kryszkiewicz M (1998) Rough set approach to incomplete information systems. Inf Sci 112:39–49

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Skowron A, Stepaniuk J (1996) Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae 27(2–3):245–253

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Slezak D, Ziarko W (2005) The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 40:81–91

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2004) Constructive and axiomatic approaches of fuzzy approximation operators. Inf Sci 159:233–254

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu WZ, Mi JS, Zhang WX (2003) Generalized fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci 152:263–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic=computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadeh LA (1997) Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 19:111–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh LA (1979) Fuzzy sets and information granularity. Adv Fuzzy Set Theory Appl 11:3–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin TY (1997) Granular computing. Announcement of the BISC Special Interest Group on Granular Computing

  17. Yao YY (2000) Granular computing: basic issues and possible solutions. In: Proceedings of the 5th Joint Conferences on Information Sciences. New Jersey, pp 186–189

  18. Yao JT (2005) Information granulation and granular relationships. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference on Granular Computing. Beijing, pp 326–329

  19. Qian YH, Liang JY, Yao YY, Dang CY (2010) MGRS: a multi-granulation rough set. Inf Sci 180:949–970

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Qian YH, Liang JY, Yao YY, Dang CY (2010) Incomplete mutigranulation rough set. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 20:420–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin GP, Li JJ, Qian YH (2013) Multigranulation rough sets: from partition to covering. Inf Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.046

  22. Lin GP, Qian YH, Li JJ (2012) NMGRS: neighborhood-based multigranulation rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 53(7):1080-1093

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin GP, Li JJ, Qian YH (2013) Topology approach to multigranulation rough sets. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0160-x

  24. Xu WH , Zhang XT, Wang QR (2011) A generalized multi-granulation rough set approach. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Computing, August 11-14, Zhengzhou, China

  25. Yang XB, Song XN , Dou HL, Yang JY (2011) Multi-granulation rough set: from crisp to fuzzy case. Ann Fuzzy Math Inf 1(1):55–70

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang XB, Zhang YQ, Yang JY (2012) Local and global measurements of MGRS rules. Int J Comput Intell Syst 5(6):1010–1024

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu W, Wang F (2003) Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 152:217–230

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu W, Wang F (2007) On three types of covering-based rough sets. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19:1131–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu W (2009) Relationship between generalized rough sets based on binary relation and covering. Inf Sci 179:210–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu J, Wang G (2009) Knowledge reduction of covering approximation space. Transactions on Computational Science, Special Issue on Cognitive Knowledge Representation:69–80

  31. Du Y, Hu QH (2011) Rule learning for classication based on neighborhood covering reduction. Inf Sci 181:5457–5467

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Qian, Y. & Liang, J. A rule-extraction framework under multigranulation rough sets. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 5, 319–326 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-013-0194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-013-0194-0

keywords

Navigation