Skip to main content
Log in

A data-driven study for evaluating fineness of cement by various predictors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modelling relationships among cement and concrete parameters from different perspectives is preferred due to its practical importance. The relationship between chemical ingredients and specific surface area which addresses fineness of cement were appraised via three predictors: robust regression (RR), support vector regression (SVR) and multi-layer perception (MLP). The main motivation of the study was to give a comparative assessment with sparse data based on accuracy of the models. In addition to accuracy, smoothing level of the estimations was also considered and the performances of three models were compared with the former practices. The experimental studies showed that the SVR model performs better than the rest of the models for identifying the relationships. The potentials of the MLP and the RR models have also been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bao Y, Hu Z, Xiong T (2013) A PSO and pattern search based memetic algorithm for SVMs parameters optimization. Neurocomputing 117:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bao Y, Xiong T, Hu Z (2014) PSO-MISMO modelling strategy for multi-step-ahead time series prediction. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(5):655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthold MR, Borgelt C, Höppner F (2010) Guide to intelligent data analysis. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherkassky V, Ma Y (2004) Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Netw 17:113–126

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherkassky V, Ma Y (2005) Multiple model regression estimation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(4):785–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dag A, Alkan B, Cira SC (2011) Investigation of applicability of fuzzy modelling approach in thickness estimation of cement raw material. NWSA Eng Sci 6(1):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demsar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Deolalkar SP (2009) Handbook for designing cement plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Draper NR, Smith H (1998) Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Casillas PE, Martinez CA, Camacho Montes H, Garcia-Luna A (2007) Prediction of Portland cement strength using statistical methods. Mater Manuf Process 22:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jianying R, Mei F, Xuging L (2009) The adjustive ridge regression estimator in a linear regression model with application to Portland cement dataset. In: Zhu K and Zhang H (eds) 2nd conference of the International Institute of Applied Statistics Studies. China

  12. Hu C, Cao L (2004) A system identification method based on multi-layer perception and model. Adv Neural Netw ISNN 3174:218–223

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khemchandani R, Karpatne A, Chandra S (2013) Twin support vector regression for the simultaneous learning of a function and its derivatives. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li S, Tan M (2010) Tuning SVM parameters by using a hybrid CLPSO-BFGS algorithm. Neurocomputing 73:2089–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madsen H, Thyregod P, Popentiu F (2005) Considerations concerning a fuzzy-genetic algorithm with application to CEM I type cements quality optimization. In: Zinn D, Savoie MJ and Lin KC (eds) 9th world multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics location. Orlando

  16. Ozturk A, Ugur A, Turan ME (2012) Prediction of effects of microstructural phases using generalized regression neural network. Constr Build Mater 29:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (2003) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  18. Development Core Team R (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schölkopf B, Smola A (2002) Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, and beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N (2004) Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Shondeep SL (1990) Effect of blaine fineness reversal on strength and hydration of cement. Cem Concr Res 20(3):398–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Struble L, Livesey P, Strother Pd, Bye GC (2011) Portland cement, composition, production and properties, 3rd edn. Ice Publishing, San Rafael

    Google Scholar 

  23. Svinning K, Datu KA (2008) Microstructure and properties of Portland cement. Part 1: evaluation of the prediction models. ZKG Int 61(2):67–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas J, Jennings H (2013) The science of concrete. e-book. Northwestern University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tutmez B (2014) Use of partial least squares analysis in concrete technology. Comput Concr 13(2):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vapnik V (1999) The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Yang B, Chen Y (2012) Modeling early-age hydration kinetics of Portland cement using flexible neural tree. Neural Comput Appl 21(5):877–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X-Z, Musa AB (2014) Advances in neural network based learning. Int J Mach Learn Cyber 5(1):1–2. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0220-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiong T, Bao Y, Hu Z (2014) Multiple-output support vector regression with a firefly algorithm for interval-valued stock price index forecasting. Knowl Based Syst 55:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yeh I-C (2007) Modeling slump flow of concrete using second-order regressions and artificial neural networks. Cement Concr Compos 29:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng S (2013) A fast algorithm for training support vector regression via smoothed primal function minimization. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.1007/s13042-013-0200-6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for the constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bulent Tutmez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tutmez, B. A data-driven study for evaluating fineness of cement by various predictors. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 6, 501–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0280-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0280-y

Keywords

Navigation