Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuzzy reciprocal preference relations (FPR) are one of the most common preference relations which decision makers (DMs) express their comparison information in decision making, and the consistency of preference relations is an important step for reasonable and reliable decision making. Based on the concept of deviation between two matrices, we develop some consistency measures for FPRs to ensure that the DMs are being neither random nor illogical. A consistency index \((CI)\) and the threshold \((\overline{CI})\) of FPRs are defined to measure whether a FPR is of acceptable consistency. For FPRs with unacceptable consistency, an optimization method and two iterative algorithms are presented to improve its consistency and the process terminates until the \(CI\) is controlled within the threshold \(\overline{CI}.\) Furthermore, one of algorithms is extended to handle group decision making (GDM) of FPRs. Finally, two examples and comparative analysis are furnished to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Basile L (1990) Ranking alternatives by weak transitivity relations. In: Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (ed) Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibilitytheory (pp. 105–112. Kluwer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2008) On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 189:430–444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan ZP, Ma J, Zhang Q (2002) An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131: 101–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedrizzi M, Giove S (2007) Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. Eur J Oper Res 183:303–313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fodor J, Roubens M (1994) Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17: 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37: 176–189

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115: 67–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jong PD (1984) A statistical approach to Saaty’s scaling method for priorities. J Math Psychol 28:467–478

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipovetsky S, Michael Conklin W (2002) Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP. Eur J Oper Res 137:110–122

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157: 20–33

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma WY, Xu JY, Wei YX (1993) A practical approach to modify pair wise comparison matrices and two criteria of modificatory effectiveness. J Sci Syst Eng 4: 37–58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6: 249–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1: 155–167

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun BZ, Ma WM (2015) An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application. Omega 51:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Świtalski Z (2001) Transitivity of fuzzy preference relations–an empirical study. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118: 503–508.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Świtalski Z (2003) General transitivity conditions for fuzzy reciprocal preference matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 137: 85–100.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12: 117–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanino T (1988) Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. In: Kacprzyk J, Roubens M (ed) Non-conventional preference relations in decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp. 54–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanino T (1990) On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. In: Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (ed) Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 172–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ureña R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302:14–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 48:2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206: 58–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu YJ, Gupta JND, Wang HM (2014) The ordinal consistency of an incomplete reciprocal preference relation. Fuzzy sets Syst 246: 62–77

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu YJ, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) A distance-based framework to deal with ordinal and additive inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Inf Sci 328:189–205

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu YJ, Kevin WL, Wang HM (2013) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2014) Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Comput Ind Eng 67:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu YJ, Patnayakuni R, Wang HM (2013) The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation. Inf Sci 224:152–164

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu YJ, Wang HM (2013) Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Appl Math Modell 37:5171–5183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu ZS (2004) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 3:217–225

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu ZS (2007) A survey of preference relations. Int J Gen Syst 36:179–203

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu ZS, Da QL (2003) An approach to improving consistency of fuzzy preference matrix. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 2:3–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu ZS, Wei CP (1999) A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 116:443–449

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17: 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmermann HJ (1991) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Associate Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that have helped to improve the quality of this paper. This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No.71471056), the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71433003), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2015B23014), Excellent Innovative Talent Program of Hohai University, sponsored by Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, and National “Twelfth Five-Year” Plan for Science & Technology Support (2015BAB07B01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, People’s Republic of China

    Yejun Xu, Xia Liu & Huimin Wang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, People’s Republic of China

    Huimin Wang

Authors
  1. Yejun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huimin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yejun Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Liu, X. & Wang, H. The additive consistency measure of fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 1141–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0637-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0637-0

Keywords