Skip to main content
Log in

Prioritized induced probabilistic operator and its application in group decision making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new extension of the ordered weighted average (OWA) operator is presented. This new operator includes the characteristics of three other operators: the prioritized, induced and probabilistic. The name is the prioritized induced probabilistic ordered weighted average (PIPOWA) operator. This operator can be used in a group decision-making process for selection of an alternative, taking into account three aspects: (1) not all of the decision-makers are equally important, (2) the probability of success of each alternative, and (3) an induced weighted vector. In the paper, some families of this operator are presented such as the prioritized probabilistic weighted average (PPOWA) operator and the prioritized induced ordered weighted average (PIOWA) operator. Additionally, some of the parameterized family of the aggregation operators, such as the minimum, maximum and total operator, are presented as special cases. The article also generalizes the PIPOWA operator by using quasi-arithmetic means. Finally, an example for selecting an alternative dispute resolution method in a commercial dispute is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal M, Hanmandlu M, Biswas KK (2013) A probabilistic and decision attitude aggregation operator for intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Intell Syst 28:806–839

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Belles-Sampera J, Merigó JM, Guillén M, Santolino M (2013) The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators. Ins Math Econ 52:411–420

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco-Mesa F, Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2017) Fuzzy decision making: a bibliometric-based review. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32:2033–2050

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R (2002) Aggregation operators: new trends and applications. Physica-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen LH, Xu ZS (2014) A prioritized aggregation operator based on the OWA operator and prioritized measures. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:1297–1307

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen LH, Xu ZS, Yu XH (2014) Prioritized measure-guided aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:1127–1138

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen LH, Xu ZS, Yu XH (2014) Weakly prioritized measure aggregation in prioritized multicriteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 29:439–461

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SJ, Chen SM (2003) A new method for handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems using FN-IOWA operators. Cybern Syst 34:109–137

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen TY (2014) A prioritized aggregation operator-based approach to multiple criteria decision making using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative perspective. Inf Sci 281:97–112

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chong HY, Zin RM (2012) Selection of dispute resolution methods: factor analysis approach. Eng Constr Archit Manag 19:428–443

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dong JY, Wan SP (2016) A new method for prioritized multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:1719–1733

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Emrouznejad A, Marra M (2014) Ordered weighted averaging operators 1988–2014: a citation-based literature survey. Int J Intell Syst 29:994–1014

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engemann KJ, Filev DP, Yager RR (1996) Modelling decision making using immediate probabilities. Int J Gen Syst 24:281–294

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenn P, Lowe D, Speck C (1997) Conflict and dispute in construction. Constr Manag Econ 15:513–518

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fodor J, Marichal JL, Roubens M (1995) Characterization of the ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3:236–240

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jannadia MO, Assaf S, Bubshait AA, Naji A (2000) Contractual methods for dispute avoidance and resolution (DAR). Int J Proj Manag 18:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jin FF, Ni ZW, Chen HY (2016) Note on hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 96:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufmann A (1988) Theory of expertons and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 28:295–304

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Leon-Castro E, Aviles-Ochoa E, Gil-Lafuente AM (2016) Exchange rate USD/MXN forecast through econometric models, time series and HOWMA operators. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 50(4):135–150

    Google Scholar 

  21. León-Castro E, Aviles-Ochoa E, Merigó JM (2017) Induced heavy moving averages. Int J Intell Syst. doi:10.1002/int.21916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma YX, Wang JQ, Wang J, Wu XH (2016) An interval neutrosophic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making method and its application in selecting medical treatment options. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2203-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merigó JM (2010) Fuzzy decision making using immediate probabilities. Comput Ind Eng 58:651–657

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merigó JM (2012) Probabilities in the OWA operator. Expert Syst Appl 39:11456–11467

    Google Scholar 

  25. Merigó JM (2015) Decision-making under risk and uncertainty and its application in strategic management. J Bus Econ Manag 16:93–116

    Google Scholar 

  26. Merigó JM, Casanovas M (2011) Induced and uncertain heavy OWA operators. Comput Ind Eng 60:106–116

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Merigó JM, Casanovas M (2011) The uncertain induced quasi-arithmetic OWA operator. Int J Intell Syst 26:1–24

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Merigó JM, Casanovas M, Martínez L (2010) Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 18:287–304

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2009) The induced generalized OWA operator. Inf Sci 179:729–741

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Merigó JM, Yager RR (2013) Generalized moving averages, distance measures and OWA operators. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 21(4):533–559

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Peng HG, Wang JQ (2016) Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. Int J Fuzzy Syst. doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0257-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ran LG, Wei GW (2015) Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Technol Econ Dev Econ 21:118–139

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tian ZP, Wang J, Wang JQ, Zhang HY (2016) Simplified neutrosophic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making approach to green product development. Group Decis Negot 26:597–627

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tian ZP, Wang J, Wang JQ, Zhang HY (2016) An improved MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision-making based on interdependent inputs of simplified neutrosophic linguistic information. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2378-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tian ZP, Wang J, Zhang HY, Wang JQ (2016) Multi-criteria decision-making based on generalized prioritized aggregation operators under simplified neutrosophic uncertain linguistic environment. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.1007/s13042-016-0552-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Verma R, Sharma B (2016) Prioritized information fusion method for triangular fuzzy information and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 24:265–290

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang H, Xu YJ, Merigó JM (2014) Prioritized aggregation for non-homogeneous group decision making in water resource management. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 48:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wei CP, Tang XJ (2012) Generalized prioritized aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 27:578–589

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wei GW (2010) Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 10:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wei GW (2012) Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators. Knowl Based Syst 31:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu XH, Wang J, Peng JJ, Chen XH (2016) Cross-entropy and prioritized aggregation operator with simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int J Fuzzy Syst 18:1104–1116

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xia MM, Xu ZS, Chen N (2011) Induced aggregation under confidence levels. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 19:201–227

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu Z (2006) On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators. Int J Gen Syst 35(1):17–28

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl Based Syst 24(2):197–209

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Yager RR (2004a) Modeling prioritized multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34:2396–2404

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yager RR (2004b) Generalized OWA aggregation operators. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 3:93–107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Yager RR (2008) Prioritized aggregation operators. Int J Approx Reason 48:263–274

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Yager RR (2009) Prioritized OWA aggregation. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8:245–262

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Yager RR, Engemann KJ, Filev DP (1995) On the concept of immediate probabilities. Int J Intell Syst 10:373–397

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Yager RR, Kacprzyk J, Beliakov G (2011) Recent developments in the ordered weighted averaging operators: theory and Practice. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yager RR, Filev DP (1999) Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 29:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ye J (2014) Prioritized aggregation operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to multicriteria decision-making. Neural Comput Appl 25:1447–1454

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yu D, Li DF, Merigó JM, Fang L (2016a) Mapping development of linguistic decision making studies. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:2727–2736

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yu D, Li DF, Merigó JM (2016b) Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7:819–831

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yu XH, Xu ZS, Liu SS (2013) Prioritized multi-criteria decision making based on preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 66:104–115

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zeng SZ, Merigó JM, Su WH (2013) The uncertain probabilistic OWA distance operator and its application in group decision making. Appl Math Model 37:6266–6275

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhao H, Xu ZS, Ni M, Liu S (2010) Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:1–30

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhao N, Xu ZS, Ren ZL (2016) On typical hesitant fuzzy prioritized “or” operator in multi-attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:73–100

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao XF, Li QX, Wei GW (2014) Some prioritized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:1619–1630

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou LY, Lin R, Zhao XF, Wei GW (2013) Uncertain linguistic prioritized aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 21:603–627

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that have improved significantly the quality of the paper. Support from the Chilean Government through the Fondecyt Regular Program (1160286) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Alessandri Pérez-Arellano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Arellano, L.A., León-Castro, E., Avilés-Ochoa, E. et al. Prioritized induced probabilistic operator and its application in group decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 451–462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0724-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0724-2

Keywords

Navigation