Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal pricing decision for supply chains with risk sensitivity and human estimation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In reality, consumption markets are changeable and uncertain in terms of consumer demands, product manufacturing costs, sales costs and so on. When facing these markets, the small and medium manufacturers are usually weak and risk sensitive vis-à-vis their counterpart power retailers, like Walmart, Carrefour, and TESCO. Therefore, human estimations on uncertain market information given by experienced experts and risk sensitivity of the weak manufacturers are of great significance for the optimal pricing strategies. Accordingly, this paper investigates the pricing decision problem in an uncertain supply chain where two risk-sensitive manufacturers distribute substitutable products into the same market through a common dominant and risk-neutral retailer. Uncertainty theory is employed to deal with human-estimation information and chance-constrained programming models are proposed to formulate the pricing decision problem with risk sensitivity. Moreover, numerical experiments are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Interestingly, we show that the results critically depend on the comparison between how much the demands and manufacturing costs of two competing products change with the manufacturers’ risk-sensitivity levels. Correspondingly, based on the estimated uncertainty distributions of uncertain variables by experts, the weak manufacturers are suggested to adjust their risk-sensitivity levels strategically for their profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal V, Seshadri S (2000) Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2:410–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson EJ, Bao Y (2010) Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 200:227–234

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38:360–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 6:73–79

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen L, Peng J, Liu Z, Zhao R (2016) Pricing and effort decisions for a supply chain with uncertain information. Int J Prod Res 55:264–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen L, Peng J, Zhang B, Li S (2017a) Uncertain programming model for uncertain minimum weight vertex covering problem. J Intell Manuf 28:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L, Peng J, Zhang B, Rosyida I (2017b) Diversified models for portfolio selection based on uncertain semivariance. Int J Syst Sci 48:637–648

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen W, Sim M, Sun J, Teo CP (2010) From cvar to uncertainty set: implications in joint chance-constrained optimization. Oper Res 58:470–485

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi SC (1991) Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Mark Sci 10:271–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi SC (1996) Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel. J Retail 72:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding SB (2014) Uncertain random newsboy problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:483–490

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng J, Lan Y, Zhao R (2017) Impact of price cap regulation on supply chain contracting between two monopolists. J Ind Manag Optim 13:349–373

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishman C (2003) The Wal-Mart you don’t know. Fast Company 77,68

  14. Gan X, Sethi SP, Yan H (2005) Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk-averse retailer. Prod Oper Manag 14:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao Y (2012) Uncertain models for single facility location problems on networks. Appl Math Model 36:2592–2599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hua Z, Li S (2008) Impacts of demand uncertainty on retailer’s dominance and manufacturer–retailer supply chain cooperation. Omega 36:697–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua Z, Li S, Liang L (2006) Impact of demand uncertainty on supply chain cooperation of single-period products. Int J Prod Econ 100:268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang H, Ke H (2017) Pricing decision problem for substitutable products based on uncertainty theory. J Intell Manuf 28:503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0991-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ke H (2014) A genetic algorithm-based optimizing approach for project time-cost trade-off with uncertain measure. J Uncertain Anal Appl 2:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar M, Vrat P, Shankar R (2006) A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 101:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamb C, Hair J, McDaniel C, Boshoff C, Terblanche N (2010) Marketing-South African. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lan Y, Liu Z, Niu B (2017) Pricing and design of after-sales service contract: the value of mining asymmetric sales cost information. Asia Pac J Oper Res 34:1812–1829

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lan Y, Zhao R, Tang W (2015) An inspection-based price rebate and effort contract model with incomplete information. Pergamon Press Inc, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee E, Staelin R (1997) Vertical strategic interaction: implications for channel pricing strategy. Mark Sci 16:185–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li B, Chen P, Li Q, Wang W (2014) Dual-channel supply chain pricing decisions with a risk-averse retailer. Int J Prod Res 52:7132–7147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu B (2009) Some research problems in uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 3:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu B (2010) Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu B (2012) Why is there a need for uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 6:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Y, Ha M (2010) Expected value of function of uncertain variables. J Uncertain Syst 4:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu YS (2013) Optimal decisions of a supply chain with two risk-averse and competing retailers under random demand. Math Probl Eng 2013(3):206–226

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu Z, Zhao R, Liu X, Chen L (2017) Contract designing for a supply chain with uncertain information based on confidence level. Appl Soft Comput 56:617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu Y, Huang Z, Gao J (2014) Under-investment problem with adverse selection in uncertain environment. J Uncertain Syst 8:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marquès G, Lamothe J, Thierry C, Gourc D (2012) A supply chain performance analysis of a pull inspired supply strategy faced to demand uncertainties. J Intell Manuf 23:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miklós-Thal J, Rey P, Vergé T (2011) Buyer power and intrabrand coordination. J Eur Econ Assoc 9:721–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rowell A (2003) Welcome to wal-world. Multinatl Monit 24:13

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ru J, Shi R, Zhang J (2015) Does a store brand always hurt the manufacturer of a competing national brand? Prod Oper Manag 24:272–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ryu K, Yücesan E (2010) A fuzzy newsvendor approach to supply chain coordination. Eur J Oper Res 200:421–438

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi R, Zhang J, Ru J (2013) Impacts of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Prod Oper Manag 22:1232–1249

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sinha S, Sarmah S (2010) Coordination and price competition in a duopoly common retailer supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 59:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith G (2002) War of the superstores: wal-mart is trouncing the locals, but they are not giving up. Business Week September 23, 60–60

  42. Wang L, Huang H, Ke H (2015) Chance-constrained model for rcpsp with uncertain durations. J Uncertain Anal Appl 3:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wei J, Zhao J (2016) Pricing decisions for substitutable products with horizontal and vertical competition in fuzzy environments. Ann Oper Res 242:505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1541-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu D, Baron O, Berman O (2009) Bargaining in competing supply chains with uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 197:548–556

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu X, Lan Y, Liu H (2014) Optimal revenue-sharing contract based on forecasting effort for uncertain agency problem. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 5:971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xie G, Yue W, Wang S, Lai KK (2011) Quality investment an d price decision in a risk-averse supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 214:403–410

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu D, Li DF, Merig JM (2015) Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhao J, Tang W, Zhao R, Wei J (2012) Pricing decisions for substitutable products with a common retailer in fuzzy environments. Eur J Oper Res 216:409–419

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhao J, Wei J, Li Y (2014) Pricing decisions for substitutable products in a two-echelon supply chain with firms’ different channel powers. Int J Prod Econ 153:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71371141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Ke.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

To model pricing decision problem with uncertain variables, we introduce some important concepts and theorems on uncertain variable. Let \(\Gamma\) be a nonempty set and \({\mathcal {L}}\) a \(\sigma\)-algebra over \(\Gamma\). Each element \(\Lambda\) in \({\mathcal {L}}\) is called an event.

Definition 1

([26]) The set function \({\mathcal {M}}\) is called an uncertain measure if it satisfies:

Axiom 1

(Normality Axiom) \({\mathcal {M}}\{\Gamma \}=1\).

Axiom 2

(Duality Axiom) \({\mathcal {M}}\{\Lambda \}+{\mathcal {M}}\{\Lambda ^{c}\}=1\).

Axiom 3

(Subadditivity Axiom) For every countable sequence of events \(\{\Lambda _{i}\}\), \(i = 1,2,\ldots\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {M}}\left\{ \bigcup _{i=1}^{\infty }\Lambda _{i}\right\} \le \sum _{i=1}^{\infty }{\mathcal {M}}\{\Lambda _{i}\}. \end{aligned}$$

Besides, the product uncertain measure on the product \(\sigma\)-algebra \({\mathcal {L}}\) was defined by [27] as follows:

Axiom 4

(Product Axiom) Let \((\Gamma _i,{\mathcal {L}}_{i},{\mathcal {M}}_{i})\) be uncertainty spaces for \(i=1,2,\ldots\). The product uncertain measure \({\mathcal {M}}\) is an uncertain measure satisfying

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {M}}\left\{ \prod \limits _{i=1}^\infty A_{i}\right\} =\bigwedge _{i=1}^\infty {\mathcal {M}}_{i}\{A_{i}\} \end{aligned}$$

where \(A_{i}\) are arbitrarily chosen events from \({\mathcal {L}}_{i}\) for \(i=1,2,\ldots\), respectively.

Definition 2

([26]) An uncertain variable is a measurable function \(\xi\) from an uncertainty space \((\Gamma ,{\mathcal {L}},{\mathcal {M}})\) to the set of real numbers, i.e., for any Borel set B of real numbers, the set

$$\begin{aligned} \{\xi \in B\}=\{\gamma \in \Gamma \ \big |\ \xi (\gamma )\in B\} \end{aligned}$$

is an event.

Definition 3

([27]) The uncertain variables \(\xi _1,\xi _2,\ldots ,\xi _n\) are said to be independent if

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathcal {M}}\left\{ \bigcap _{i=1}^n(\xi _i\in B_i)\right\} =\bigwedge _{i=1}^n {\mathcal {M}}\{\xi _i\in B_i\} \end{aligned}$$

for any Borel sets \(B_1, B_2,\ldots , B_n\).

Definition 4

([26]) The uncertainty distribution \(\Phi\) of an uncertain variable \(\xi\) is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \Phi (x)={\mathcal {M}}\{\xi \le x\} \end{aligned}$$

for any real number x.

An uncertainty distribution \(\Phi\) is said to be regular if its inverse function \(\Phi ^{-1}(\alpha )\) exists and is unique for each \(\alpha \in [0,1]\).

Lemma 1

([28]) Let\(\xi _1, \xi _2, \ldots , \xi _n\)be independent uncertain variables with regular uncertainty distributions\(\Phi _1, \Phi _2, \ldots , \Phi _n,\)respectively. If the function\(f(x_1,x_2,\ldots ,x_n)\) is strictly increasing with respect to \(x_1,x_2,\ldots , x_m\)and strictly decreasing with respect to\(x_{m+1},x_{m+2},\ldots ,x_n,\)then

$$\begin{aligned} \xi =f(\xi _1, \xi _2, \ldots , \xi _n) \end{aligned}$$

is an uncertain variable with inverse uncertainty distribution

$$\begin{aligned} \Phi ^{-1}(\alpha )=f(\Phi _1^{-1}(\alpha ),\ldots ,\Phi _m^{-1}(\alpha ),\Phi _{m+1}^{-1}(1-\alpha ),\ldots ,\Phi _n^{-1}(1-\alpha )). \end{aligned}$$

Definition 5

([26]) Let \(\xi\) be an uncertain variable. The expected value of \(\xi\) is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} E[\xi ]=\int _0^{+\infty }{\mathcal {M}}\{\xi \ge r\}d r-\int _{-\infty }^0{\mathcal {M}}\{\xi \le r\} d r \end{aligned}$$

provided that at least one of the above two integrals is finite.

Lemma 2

([28]) Let\(\xi\)be an uncertain variable with regular uncertainty distribution\(\Phi.\)If the expected value exists, then

$$\begin{aligned} E[\xi ]=\int _0^1 \Phi ^{-1}(\alpha )d \alpha . \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 3

([30]) Let\(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots ,\xi _{n}\)be independent uncertain variables with regular uncertainty distributions\(\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2},\ldots ,\Phi _{n},\)respectively. A function\(f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{n})\)is strictly increasing with respect to\(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{m}\)and strictly decreasing with respect to\(x_{m+1},x_{m+2},\ldots ,x_{n}.\)Then the expected value of\(\xi =f(\xi _{1},\xi _{2},\ldots , \xi _{n})\)is

$$\begin{aligned} \text {E}[\xi ]=\int _{0}^{1} f(\Phi _{1}^{-1}(\alpha ),\ldots ,\Phi _{m}^{-1}(\alpha ),\Phi _{m+1}^{-1}(1-\alpha ),\ldots ,\Phi _{n}^{-1}(1-\alpha ))\mathrm {d}\alpha \end{aligned}$$
(25)

provided that the expected value\(E[\xi ]\)exists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, W., Cheng, R., Ke, H. et al. Optimal pricing decision for supply chains with risk sensitivity and human estimation. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 1717–1730 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0848-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0848-z

Keywords

Navigation