Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State of health prediction for lithium-ion batteries using multiple-view feature fusion and support vector regression ensemble

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries have been widely used in many electronic systems. Accurately estimating the state of health (SOH) of a lithium-ion battery is important for ensuring its safety and reliability. Among the various kinds of methods for predicting the SOH of lithium-ion batteries, machine-learning-based methods are the most popular. However, two common critical problems in machine-learning-based methods are extracting discriminative features and effectively utilizing the extracted features. In this study, we focused on solving these two issues. First, a sliding-window-based feature extraction technology (SWBFE) was designed to effectively extract features from different views in the discharge process of lithium-ion batteries. Second, we developed a multiple-view feature fusion with a support vector regression (SVR) ensemble strategy (MVFF-ESVR) for enhancing the performance in fusing multiple extracted features. The basic idea of MVFF-ESVR is to transform the feature-level fusion problem into a decision-level fusion problem. More specifically, for each feature, an SVR was modeled on the corresponding training set, and the AdaBoost and Stacking algorithms were utilized to incorporate multiple trained SVRs for generating two ensemble SVR models. By combining SWBFE with MVFF-ESVR, we further implemented two predictors, namely, Ada-TargetSOH and Sta-TargetSOH, for robust prediction of lithium-ion battery SOH. To evaluate the efficacy of the proposed predictors, we applied Ada-TargetSOH and Sta-TargetSOH on three types of lithium-ion battery datasets. The experimental results have demonstrated that our predictors outperform other existing lithium-ion battery SOH predictors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang J, Lee J (2011) A review on prognostics and health monitoring of Li-ion battery. J Power Sources 196(15):6007–6014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JG, Son B, Mukherjee S et al (2015) A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid state batteries. J Power Sour 282:299–322

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rezvanizaniani SM, Liu Z, Y Chen et al (2014) Review and recent advances in battery health monitoring and prognostics technologies for electric vehicle (EV) safety and mobility. J Power Sources 256(12):110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao L, Köttig F (2014) Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Trans Reliab 63(1):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biagetti T, Sciubba E (2004) Automatic diagnostics and prognostics of energy conversion processes via knowledge-based systems. Energy 29: 12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Majidian A, Saidi MH (2007) Comparison of Fuzzy logic and neural network in life prediction of boiler tubes. Int J Fatigue 29(3):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong H, Jin X, Y Lou et al (2014) Lithium-ion battery state of health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction based on support vector regression-particle filter. J Power Sour 271:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nuhic A, Terzimehic T, Soczka-Guth T et al (2013) Health diagnosis and remaining useful life prognostics of lithium-ion batteries using data-driven methods. J Power Sour 239:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goebel K, Saha B, Saxena A et al (2010) Prognostics in battery health management. IEEE Instrum Meas Mag 11(4):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang S, Yu C, X Wang et al (2014) Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on the wiener process with measurement error. Energies 7(2):520–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li F, Xu J (2015) A new prognostics method for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on a mixture of Gaussian process models and particle filter. Microelectron Reliab 55(7):1035–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miao Q, Cui H, L Xie et al (2013) Remaining useful life prediction of the lithium-ion battery using particle filtering. J Chongqing University 36(8):47–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng X, Fang H (2015) An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 144:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu J (2015) State-of-health monitoring and prediction of lithium-ion battery using probabilistic indication and state-space model. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64(11):2937–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He W, Williard N, M Osterman et al (2011) Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster–Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. J Power Sources 196(23):10314–10321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eddahech A, Briat O, Bertrand N et al (2012) Behavior and state-of-health monitoring of Li-ion batteries using impedance spectroscopy and recurrent neural networks. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 42(1):487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Miao Q, B Zheng et al (2013) Quantitative analysis of lithium-ion battery capacity prediction via adaptive bathtub-shaped function. Energies 6(6):3082–3096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rasmussen CE, Williams CK (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller S, Childers D (2012) Probability and random processes: With applications to signal processing and communications: academic Press

  20. Liu D, Pang J, J Zhou et al (2013) Prognostics for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on combination Gaussian process functional regression. Microelectron Reliab 53(6):832–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Der Merwe R, Doucet A, De Freitas N et al. The unscented particle filter. pp 584–590

  22. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. pp 182–193

  23. Si XS, Wang W, CH Hu et al (2013) A Wiener-process-based degradation model with a recursive filter algorithm for remaining useful life estimation. Mech Syst Signal Process 35: 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xing Y, Ma EW, Tsui K-L et al (2013) An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries. Microelectron Reliab 53(6):811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sepasi S, Ghorbani R, Liaw BY (2015) Inline state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries using state of charge calculation. J Power Sour 299:246–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang XZ, He YL, Wang DD (2013) Non-naive bayesian classifiers for classification problems with continuous attributes. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai G, Wang P, C Hu et al (2014) A generic model-free approach for lithium-ion battery health management. Appl Energy 135:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang S, Zhao L, X Su et al (2014) Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on battery performance analysis and flexible support vector regression. Energies 7(10):6492–6508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou Y, Huang M, Chen Y et al (2016) A novel health indicator for on-line lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction. J Power Sour 321:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Klass V, Behm M, Lindbergh G (2014) A support vector machine-based state-of-health estimation method for lithium-ion batteries under electric vehicle operation. J Power Sources 270(3):262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu C, Jain G, P Zhang et al. Data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization and k-nearest neighbor regression for estimating capacity of lithium-ion battery. Applied Energy 129:49–55

  32. Liu D, Zhou J, Pan D et al (2015) Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation with an optimized Relevance Vector Machine algorithm with incremental learning. Measurement 63:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu J, Wang Y, X Zhang et al (2016) A novel state of health estimation method of Li-ion battery using group method of data handling. J Power Sour 327:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  34. Andre D, Appel C, Soczka-Guth T et al (2013) Advanced mathematical methods of SOC and SOH estimation for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 224(5):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saha B, Kai G, S Poll et al (2009) Prognostics methods for battery health monitoring using a bayesian framework. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58(2):291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Blum AL, Langley P (1997) Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artif Intell 97(1):245–271

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Joachims T (1998) Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Mach Learn: ECML -98:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang D, Miao Q, Pecht M (2013) Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on relevance vectors and a conditional three-parameter capacity degradation model. J Power Sources 239(10):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu C, Jain G, Schmidt C et al (2015) Online estimation of lithium-ion battery capacity using sparse Bayesian learning. J Power Sour 289:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang J, Yang J-y, Zhang D et al (2003) Feature fusion: parallel strategy vs. serial strategy. Pattern Recognit 36(6):1369–1381

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun Q-S, Zeng S-G, Y Liu et al (2005) A new method of feature fusion and its application in image recognition. Pattern Recognit 38(12):2437–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang XZ, Li CG (2005) A new definition of sensitivity for RBFNN and its applications to feature reduction. Advances in Neural Networks—ISNN 2005, Second International Symposium on Neural Networks, Chongqing, China, pp 81–86

  43. Hu J, Han K, Y Li et al (2016) TargetCrys: protein crystallization prediction by fusing multi-view features with two-layered SVM. Amino Acids 48(11):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 97: 273–324

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu DJ, Hu J, Wu XW et al (2013) Learning protein multi-view features in complex space. Amino Acids 44(5):1365–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dieckmann A, Rieskamp J (2007) The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences. Memory Cognition 35(7):1801–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu DJ, Wu XW, HB Shen et al (2012) Enhancing membrane protein subcellular localization prediction by parallel fusion of multi-view features. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 11(4):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14(3):199–222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Basak D, Pal S, Patranabis DC (2007) Support vector regression. Neural Inf Process Lett Rev 11(10):203–224

    Google Scholar 

  50. Freund Y, Schapire RE. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. 148–156

  51. Wolpert DH (1992) Stacked generalization. Neural networks 5(2):241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Saha B, Goebel K (2007) Battery data set, NASA AMES prognostics data repository

  53. Orchard ME, Tang L, B Saha et al (2010) Risk-sensitive particle-filtering-based prognosis framework for estimation of remaining useful life in energy storage devices. Stud Inf Control 19(3):209–218

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pedregosa F, Gramfort A, Michel V et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12(10):2825–2830

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Yu DJ, Hu J, J Yang et al (2013) Designing template-free predictor for targeting protein-ligand binding sites with classifier ensemble and spatial clustering. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 10(4):994–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Market Res 14(3):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Qin T, Zeng S, Guo J (2015) Robust prognostics for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on an improved PSO–SVR model. Microelectron Reliab 55:1280–1284

    Google Scholar 

  59. Qin T, Zeng S, J Guo et al (2016) A rest time-based prognostic framework for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries with regeneration phenomena. Energies 9(11):896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang XZ, Wang R, HM Feng et al (2014) A new approach to classifier fusion based on upper integral. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(5):620–635

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang XZ, Xing HJ, Li Y et al (2015) A study on relationship between generalization abilities and fuzziness of base classifiers in ensemble learning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(5):1638–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yager RR (1987) On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf Sci 41(2):93–137

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin RPW et al (1998) On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(3):226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61572242).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information and Communication Branch, State Grid Shandong Electric Power CO., Jinan, 250001, Shandong, China

    Chao Ma, Xu Zhai, Zhaopei Wang, Mingguang Tian, Qiusheng Yu, Lei Liu & Hao Wang

  2. School of Computer, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, 212003, Jiangsu, China

    Xibei Yang

  3. NARI Group Corporation (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute), Nanjing, 210003, Jiangsu, China

    Hao Liu

Authors
  1. Chao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaopei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingguang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qiusheng Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xibei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Wang or Xibei Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, C., Zhai, X., Wang, Z. et al. State of health prediction for lithium-ion batteries using multiple-view feature fusion and support vector regression ensemble. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 2269–2282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0865-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0865-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation