Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective unit commitment optimization with ultra-low emissions under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low cost, high reliability and low pollution are prime targets when performing current unit commitment optimization. As an extension of previous works, this study establishes a multi-objective unit commitment model which takes into account all of the above targets. The main content includes: First, the pricing support for thermal units with ultra-low emissions is involved when analyzing the operation cost of generation systems, which accords with the current policy of power markets. Second, a conditional Value-at-Risk-based measurement is formed to estimate system reliability considering the stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties existed in future load, renewable generation and equipment failures, which is sensitive to tail risks and provides easy-to-adjust conservativeness against worst-case scenarios. Third, to deal with the proposed model, a practical approach is applied to develop a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm, which improves the Pareto fronts obtained by existing methods. The effectiveness of this research is exemplified by two case studies, which demonstrate that the model finds appropriate pricing support for the reformed units, and the proposed reliability measurement is able to realize a number of trade-offs between cost effective and solution robustness, thus providing decision support for system operators. Finally, the comparisons on performance metrics such as spacing and hyper-volume also justify the superiority of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang Z, Zhang L, Li G, Yang L (2018) Active power and reactive power dispatch of wind farm based on wavelet learning. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(2):217–223

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao Y, Xing W, Lu W, Zhang X, Christensen TH (2012) Environmental impact assessment of the incineration of municipal solid waste with auxiliary coal in China. Waste Manag 32(10):1989–1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng QP, Wang J, Liu AL (2015) Stochastic optimization for unit commitment-a review. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(4):1913–1924

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gooi H, Mendes D, Bell KRW, Kirschen D (1999) Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(4):1485–1492

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang S, Pedrycz W (2015) Robust granular optimization: a structured approach for optimization under integrated uncertainty. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(5):1372–1386

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value-at-risk. J Deriv 4(3):7–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang B, Wang S, Watada J (2011) Fuzzy portfolio selection models with Value-at-Risk. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(4):758–769

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma W, Cheng R, Ke H, Zhao Z (2019) Optimal pricing decision for supply chains with risk sensitivity and human estimation. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(7):1717–1730

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang B, Wang S, Zhou X, Watada J (2016) Two-stage multi-objective unit commitment optimization under hybrid uncertainties. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(3):2266–2277

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander GJ, Baptista AM (2004) A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance Model. Manag Sci 50(9):1261–1273

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uryasev SP (2000) Probabilistic constrained optimization methodology and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahimi M, Ghezavati V (2018) Sustainable multi-period reverse logistics network design and planning under uncertainty utilizing conditional value at risk (cvar) for recycling construction and demolition waste. J Clean Prod 172:1567–1581

    Google Scholar 

  13. Asensio M, Contreras J (2015) Stochastic unit commitment in isolated systems with renewable penetration under CVaR assessment. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 172:1567–1581

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang B, Wang SM, Zhou X, Watada J (2016) Multi-objective unit commitment with wind penetration and emission concerns under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties. Energy 111(1):18–31

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Z, He Y, Wang X (2019) An overview of probabilistic-based expressions for qualitative decision-making: techniques, comparisons and developments. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(6):1513–1528

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen R, Guo S, Wang X, Zhang T (2019) Fusion of multi-RSMOTE with fuzzy integral to classify bug reports with an imbalanced distribution. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(12):2406–2420

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Huang B (2017) Cost-sensitive sequential three-way decision modeling using a deep neural network. Int J Approx Reason 85(4):68–78

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Yang X, Song X, Li J, Wang P, Yu D (2019) Neighborhood attribute reduction: a multi-criterion approach. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(4):731–742

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niu J, Huang C, Li J, Fan M (2018) Parallel computing techniques for concept-cognitive learning based on granular computing. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(11):1785–1805

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang ZK, Liu P, Cheng L, Wang H, Ming B, Gong WT (2018) Deriving operating rules for a large-scale hydro-photovoltaic power system using implicit stochastic optimization. J Clean Prod 195:562–572

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coello C, Pulido G, Lechuga M (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 8(3):256–279

    Google Scholar 

  22. Srinivas N, Deb K (1995) Multiobjective function optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolut Comput 2(3):221–248

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6(2):182–197

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tripathi P, Bandyopadhyay S, Pal S (2007) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients. Inf Sci 177(22):5033–5049

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang B, Li Y, Watada J (2013) Supply reliability and generation cost analysis due to load forecast uncertainty in unit commitment problems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(3):2242–2252

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evolut Comput 8(2):173–195

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JO, Singh C (2002) Including uncertainty in LOLE calculation using fuzzy set theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(1):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(4):445–450

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang SM, Wang B, Watada J (2017) Adaptive budget-portfolio investment optimization under risk tolerance ambiguity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(2):363–376

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen K, Chen K, Wang Q, He Z, Hu J, He J (2019) Short-term load forecasting with deep residual networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(4):3943–3952

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wan C, Xu Z, Pinson P, Dong ZY, Wong KP (2014) Probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation using extreme learning machine. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(3):1033–1044

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hong T, Wilson J, Xie J (2014) Long term probabilistic load forecasting and normalization with hourly information. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(1):456–462

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang B, Zhou M, Watada J (2017) Unit commitment optimization with pricing support for ultra-low emissions: a multi-objective approach. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international conference on control science and systems engineering, pp 692–697

  34. Wang SJ, Shahidehpour SM, Kirschen DS, Mokhtari S, Irisarri GD (1995) Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(3):1294–1301

    Google Scholar 

  35. Trivedi A, Srinivasan D, Sharma D, Singh C (2013) Evolutionary multi-objective day-ahead thermal generation scheduling in uncertain environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(2):1345–1354

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chang PT, Hung KC (2006) \(\alpha\)-cut fuzzy arithmetic: simplifying rules and a fuzzy function optimization with a decision variable. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(4):496–510

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reddy SS (2019) Optimal power flow using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(5):1077–1091

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neual networks, IV, pp 1942–1948

  39. Lee J, Kim J, Song J, Kim Y, Jung S (2016) A novel memetic algorithm using modified particle swarm optimization and mesh adaptive direct search for PMSM design. IEEE Trans MAGN 52(3):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lin C, Li M, Ting A, Lin M (2011) A robust self-learning PID control system design for nonlinear systems using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2(4):225–234

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu J, Li H, Huang B, Zhou X, Zhang L (2019) Similarity-divergence intuitionistic fuzzy decision using particle swarm optimization. Appl Soft Comput 81:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  42. Behera SR, Panigrahi BK (2019) A multi objective approach for placement of multiple DGs in the radial distribution system. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(8):2027–2041

    Google Scholar 

  43. Simopoulos DN, Kavatza SD, Vournas CD (2006) Reliability constrained unit commitment using simulated annealing. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1699–1706

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Y, Wu K, Long H, Gao J, Yan X, Kato T, Suzuoki Y (2014) Integrated electricity and heating demand-side management for wind power integration in China. Energy 78:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  45. Clerc M (2006) Particle swarm optimization. ISTE, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang H, Jiao L, Yao X (2015) \(\text{ Two }\_\text{ Arch2 }\): an improved two-archive algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 19(4):524–541

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rada-Vilela J, Chica M, Cordon O, Damas S (2013) A comparative study of multi-objective ant colony optimization algorithms for the time and space assembly line balancing problem. Appl Soft Comput 13(11):4370–4382

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61603176, 71732003), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20160632), the Young Scholar Support Programme of Nanjing University of Finance&Economics (Grant No. L_YXW15101), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 14380037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Li, H., Wang, B. et al. Multi-objective unit commitment optimization with ultra-low emissions under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 12, 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01103-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01103-9

Keywords

Navigation