Abstract
The need for continuous improvement in engineering designs of aerospace and automotive products exist in order to optimize cost, weight, volume etc. Due to the inherent uncertainties such as external loading, material properties and manufacturing quality, the prototypes of manufactured product may not satisfy all the requirements. Deterministic approaches cannot take into account all the variabilities that characterize design input properties leading to oversized or undersized structure. The present paper deals with response surface methodology where the performance functions are generated using design of experiments. These simplified linear performance functions are used for design optimization. Further, an outline of the methodology is discussed that could serve as a guideline to develop a more efficient and optimized design process. Here, the product optimization is carried out in stages starting from deterministic optimization, followed by reliability based design optimization using reliability index approach and performance measure approach to meet target reliability requirements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a0, ai :
-
Regression coefficient for stress
- b0, bi :
-
Regression coefficient for strain
- d:
-
Design variable
- e:
-
Strain
- g(x), G(x):
-
Performance function
- I:
-
Indicator function
- N:
-
Number of run
- pf :
-
Probability of failure
- P:
-
Pressure
- Ri :
-
Internal radius
- S:
-
Induced stress
- t:
-
Wall thickness
- u:
-
Standard normal variable
- W:
-
Weight
- x:
-
Random variables
- \( \beta_{ \in } ,\beta_{S} \) :
-
Reliability index
- βT :
-
Target reliability
- LP:
-
Linear programming
- MCS:
-
Monte Carlo simulation
- MPP:
-
Most probable point
- PMA:
-
Performance measure approach
- RBDO:
-
Reliability based design optimization
- RIA:
-
Reliability index approach
- RSM:
-
Response surface method
References
Agarwal H (2004) Reliability based design optimization formulation and methodologies. A Dissertation Notre Dame, Indiana 2004
Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh Kumar K, Janardhan Reddy TA (2009) Structural reliability analysis of a pressure vessel using multiple regression. In: Proceedings of international conference on computational methods in engineering and science (IC-CMES ‘09’) 8–10 Jan 2009, pp 258–262
Bhattacharjee P, Janardhan Reddy TA, Ramesh Kumar K (2009) Structural reliability evaluation using response surface method. In: Proceedings of international conference on reliability, maintainability and safety. IEEE ICRMS-2009, pp 972–977
Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh Kumar K, Janardhan Reddy TA (2010) Reliability design evaluation and optimization of a nitrogen gas bottle using response surface method. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 17(2):119–132
Justin Wu Y-T, Shin Y, Sues R, Cesare M (2001) Safety-factor based approach for probability-based design optimization. In: AIAA 2001-1522, Seattle, WA, pp 1–9
Kim S-R, Park J-Y, Lee W-G, Yu J-S, Han S-Y (2007) Reliability-based topology optimization based on evolutionary structural optimization. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 32:168–172
Kwak BM, Lee TW (1987) Sensitivity analysis for reliability based optimization using an AFSOM method. Comput Struct 27(3):399–406
Kyumchoi S, Grandhi RV, Canfield RA (2006) Reliability-based structural design. Springer, London
Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (2001) Design potential method for robust system parameter design. AIAA J 39(4):667–677
Grandhi RV, Wang L (1999) Structural reliability analysis and optimization: use of approximations. Wright State University, Dayton
Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 42(1):124–131
Acknowledgments
The constant encouragement and supports extended by Director DRDL, and by Director R&QA, DRDL are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharjee, P., Ramesh Kumar, K. & Janardhan Reddy, T.A. Reliability design optimization for aerospace product an integrated approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 3, 153–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0097-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0097-6