Skip to main content
Log in

Power system: a reliability assessment using FTA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) serves as a powerful tool for system risk analysis and reliability assessment. FTA is a top-down approach to failure analysis, starting with a potential undesirable event and then determining Base event (BE). The undesired state of the system is represented by the Top Event (TE). TE and BE are integrated through electronic logic gates (AND gate, OR gate). The fault tree is a tool to identify and assess the combinations of the undesired events in the control of system operation and its environment that can lead to the undesired state of the system. It is recognized worldwide as an important tool for evaluating safety and reliability in system design, development and operation. In this work, an efficient methodology is utilized to find out reliability assessment of critical and/or complex system. The main features and application of this technique for a power system are discussed. Minimal cut sets are developed by means of Boolean equation method. For main substation all CCF are considered at an average temperature of 35 °C. The objective of this work is to develop a method for power system reliability using the FTA approach. The methodology adopted in this investigation is to generate fault trees for each load point of the power system. This fault trees are related to disruption of energy delivery from generators to the specific load points. Quantitative evaluation of the fault trees represents a standpoint for assessment of reliability of power delivery and enables identification of the most important elements in the power system. The power system reliability is assessed and the main contributors to power system reliability are identified, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Institute of chemical engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety (2008) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedure, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 142–157

  • Alvehag K (2008) Impact of dependencies in risk assessments of power distribution system, Licentiate Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology. School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadi Mohammad Sadegh, Nobakht Azim, Meskarbashee Ali (2011) Fault tree analysis approach in reliability assessment of power system. Int J Multidiscip Sci Eng 2(6):46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yuan Y, Li F (2010) Evaluating the reliability of islanded microgrid in an emergency mode, UPEC, Cardiff, Wales, UK

  • Massim Y, Zeblah A, Meziane R, Benguediab M, Ghouraf A (2005) Optimal design and reliability evaluation of multi-state series-parallel power system. Nonlinear Dyn 40:309–321

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Massim Y, Zeblah A, Benguediab M, Ghouraf A, Meziane R (2006) Reliability evaluation of electrical power systems including multi-state consideration. Electr Eng 88(2):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matijevics Istava, Jozsa Laios (1995) An Expert-system-assisted reliability analysis of electrical power networks. Eng Appl Artifi Intell 8:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh C, Chintaluri GM (1995) Reliability evaluation of interconnected power systems using a multi-parameter gamma distribution. Electr Power Energy Syst 17:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnamon RM, Andrews JD (1997) New approaches to evaluating fault tree. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesely WE, Goldberg FF, Roberts NH, Haasl DF (1981) “Fault tree hand book”, system and reliability research office of nuclear regulary research. U.S nuclear regulatory commission, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesely W, Dugan J, Fragola J, Minarick J, Railsback J (2002) Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkanovski Andrija, Cepin Marko, Mavko Borut (2009) Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1116–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Zong-Xiao, Zheng Yan-Yi, Xue Jin-Xue (2009) Development of automatic fault tree synthesis system using decision matrix. Int J Prod Econ 121(1):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Siva Shanmugam.

Appendix Nomenclature and abbreviations

Appendix Nomenclature and abbreviations

Symbol

Event

Q GDi ,

The failure probability of power delivery to ith load

R ps ,

Power system reliability

Q ps ,

Power system unreliability

K i ,

Capacity of ith load

K

Total capacity of the system

R ps

Reliability of the power system

figure a

AND gate

figure b

OR gate

figure c

Basic event

figure d

Top & intermediate event

figure e

Transfer gate

DS

Disconnect switch

CB

Circuit breakers

NL,

Number of loads in the system

TE1, TE2, TE3 and TE4

Power failure to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively.

IE1, IE 10, IE18 and

Failure to deliver energy from generators and lines to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively.

IE26

Failure of energy delivery from generators to lines

IE3, IE11, IE19 and IE27

Failure of generators to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 due to substation component failure respectively.

IE4, IE12, IE20 and IE28

Failure of energy delivery from generator 1 (G1) to load1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively.

IE5, IE13, IE21 and IE29

Failure of energy delivery from generator 2 (G2) to load, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively.

IE6, IE14, IE22 and IE30

Failure of energy deliver from G1 to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 01 respectively.

IE7, IE15, IE23 and IE31

Failure of energy deliver from G1 to load 1, load2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 02 respectively.

IE8, IE16, IE24 and IE32

Failure of energy deliver from G2 to load1, load2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 01 respectively.

IE9, IE17, IE25 and IE33

Failure of energy deliver from G2 to load1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 through Bus 02 respectively.

BE1, BE8, BE13 and BE18

DS06, DS08, DS12 and DS14 fails to remain closed respectively.

BE2, BE9, BE14 and BE 19

CB03, CB04, CB06 and CB07 fails to remain closed respectively.

BE3, BE10, BE15 and BE 20

DS07, DS09, DS13 and DS15 fail to close respectively.

BE4, BE11, BE16 and BE 21

CB04, CB08, CB07 and CB05 fail to close respectively.

BE7, BE12, BE17 and BE22

Failure of lines to load 1, load 2, load 3 and load 4 respectively.

BE5

Failure of generator 1

BE6

Failure of generator 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaise, J., Ajay Kumar, N.B., Shanmugam, N.S. et al. Power system: a reliability assessment using FTA. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4, 78–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0100-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-012-0100-2

Keywords

Navigation