Abstract
Corrosion in the pipes, transporting oil and gas, significantly increases the likelihood of pipe failure due to rupture or leakage under internal pressure. Hence, calculation of the strength of corroded pipes is an important parameter in the development of the maintenance strategy of the pipes. One of the commonly used models for calculating the strength of corroded pipes is the ASME B31G. For calculation this model uses the data about (a) the diameter of the pipe; (b) the wall thickness; (c) the length of corrosion pits; and (d) the depth of corrosion pits. Unfortunately the inspection data of these parameters always contains imperfections of various kinds. This paper presents two different approaches for simultaneously handling the variability and uncertainty in the inspection data for calculating the likelihood of failure of corroded pipes. The first approach is the probabilistic approach based on the concept of two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation. The second approach is the possibilistic approach. In the possibilistic approach the variability and uncertainty membership functions are combined to obtain the possibility distribution function of a variable. These resultant membership functions are used to calculate the possibility and necessity measures of failure. The possibility and necessity measures are, respectively, more and less conservative than the probability of failure.













Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahammed M (1997) Prediction of remaining strength of corroded pressurised pipelines. Int J Press Vessels Pip 71:213–217
Ahammed M (1998) Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects. Int J Press Vessels Pip 75:321–329
Ahammed M, Melchers RE (1996) Reliability estimation of pressurised pipelines subject to localised corrosion defects. Int J Press Vessels Pip 69:267–272
ANSI/ASME (1991) ASME B31G-1991: manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Ayyub BM, Chao R-J (1998) Uncertainty modeling in civil engineering with structural and reliability applications. In: Ayyub BM (ed) Uncertainty modeling and analysis in civil engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–31
Ayyub BM, Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty modeling and analysis in engineering and sciences. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton
Bell S (1999) A beginner’s guide to uncertainty of measurement. Issue 2, National Physical Laboratory, Report No. 11
Dubois D, Foulloy L, Mauris G, Prade H (2004) Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliab Comput 10:273–297
Freire JLF, Vieira RD, Castro JTP, Benjamin AC (2006) Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Exp Tech 30(6):60–65
Guyonnet D, Come B, Perrochet P, Parriaux A (1999) Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainties in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 125(7):660–666
ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Karimi I, Hüllermeier E (2007) Risk assessment system of natural hazards: a new approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158:987–999
Kentel E, Aral MM (2005) 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D Fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:86–96
Mauris G, Lasserre V, Foulloy L (2001) A fuzzy approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Measurement 29:165–177
Melchers RE (2001) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York
Ross TJ (2004) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Singh M Markeset T (2013) Probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes: part 1 handling of variability
Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, M., Markeset, T. Simultaneous handling of variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5, 43–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0202-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0202-5