Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous handling of variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrosion in the pipes, transporting oil and gas, significantly increases the likelihood of pipe failure due to rupture or leakage under internal pressure. Hence, calculation of the strength of corroded pipes is an important parameter in the development of the maintenance strategy of the pipes. One of the commonly used models for calculating the strength of corroded pipes is the ASME B31G. For calculation this model uses the data about (a) the diameter of the pipe; (b) the wall thickness; (c) the length of corrosion pits; and (d) the depth of corrosion pits. Unfortunately the inspection data of these parameters always contains imperfections of various kinds. This paper presents two different approaches for simultaneously handling the variability and uncertainty in the inspection data for calculating the likelihood of failure of corroded pipes. The first approach is the probabilistic approach based on the concept of two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation. The second approach is the possibilistic approach. In the possibilistic approach the variability and uncertainty membership functions are combined to obtain the possibility distribution function of a variable. These resultant membership functions are used to calculate the possibility and necessity measures of failure. The possibility and necessity measures are, respectively, more and less conservative than the probability of failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahammed M (1997) Prediction of remaining strength of corroded pressurised pipelines. Int J Press Vessels Pip 71:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed M (1998) Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects. Int J Press Vessels Pip 75:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed M, Melchers RE (1996) Reliability estimation of pressurised pipelines subject to localised corrosion defects. Int J Press Vessels Pip 69:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/ASME (1991) ASME B31G-1991: manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  • Ayyub BM, Chao R-J (1998) Uncertainty modeling in civil engineering with structural and reliability applications. In: Ayyub BM (ed) Uncertainty modeling and analysis in civil engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyub BM, Klir GJ (2006) Uncertainty modeling and analysis in engineering and sciences. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (1999) A beginner’s guide to uncertainty of measurement. Issue 2, National Physical Laboratory, Report No. 11

  • Dubois D, Foulloy L, Mauris G, Prade H (2004) Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliab Comput 10:273–297

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freire JLF, Vieira RD, Castro JTP, Benjamin AC (2006) Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Exp Tech 30(6):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Come B, Perrochet P, Parriaux A (1999) Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainties in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 125(7):660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi I, Hüllermeier E (2007) Risk assessment system of natural hazards: a new approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158:987–999

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral MM (2005) 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D Fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:86–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mauris G, Lasserre V, Foulloy L (2001) A fuzzy approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Measurement 29:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (2001) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross TJ (2004) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M Markeset T (2013) Probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes: part 1 handling of variability

  • Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maneesh Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, M., Markeset, T. Simultaneous handling of variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5, 43–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0202-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0202-5

Keywords