Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis of process controlled systems considering dynamic failure of components

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional reliability analysis techniques assume behavior of the components as binary-state while evaluating reliability of system. These components have two states only: complete failure and perfect functioning. But reliability analysis is often focused on a component, which has multi-state functioning. Such components are able to perform its task with partial performance and hence can fail at any intermediate state as well. The time to failure for these intermediate states of a component can have different probability distribution which does vary from one state to another. In addition, it is also possible that the fault may increase/decrease in a particular direction with respect to time. In this paper, a methodology is developed for reliability estimation of the dynamic systems considering (a) multi-state failure; (b) probability distribution for time to failure for these multi-states and (c) fault increment of components during the system evolution. The methodology uses Monte Carlo simulation and next transition time sampling technique. The methodology was applied to a level control system of a hold up tank with continuous inlet and outlet flows as a benchmark exercise. With the help of results, it has been shown that there is a significant over and underestimation of probability of failure as compared to that of binary mode of failure and hence reliability of the system. It is suggested that one should take care of these dynamic characteristics while estimating the system reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldemir T (1987) Computer-assisted Markov failure modeling of process-control systems. IEEE Trans Reliab R-36:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bause F, Kritzinger PS (2002) Stochastic petri nets: an introduction to the theory, 2nd edn. Vieweg, Auflage

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cojazzi G (1996) The DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deoss DL, Siu N (1989) A simulation model for dynamic system availability analysis. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

  • Devooght J (2002) Dynamic reliability. In: Lewins J, Becker M (eds) Advances in nuclear science and technology, vol 25. Springer, New York, pp 215–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Devooght J, Smidts C (1992) Probabilistic reactor dynamics-I: the theory of continuous event trees. Nucl Sci Eng 111:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Devooght J, Smidts C (1996) Probabilistic dynamics as a tool for dynamic PSA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubi A (1998) Analytic approach and Monte Carlo methods for realistic systems analysis. Math Comput Simul 47:243–269

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dutuit Y, Chatelet E, Signoret JP, Thomas P (1997) Dependability modelling and evaluation by using stochastic Petri nets: application to two test cases. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 55:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari PM, Reddy G, Rami SA, Verma AK (2011a) Applying mechanistic models to reliability evaluation of mechanical components—an illustration. Ann Nucl Energy 38:1447–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari PM, Rami RG, Srividya A, Verma AK (2011b) Reliability prediction of control valves through mechanistic models. J Mech Eng Res 2:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo J, Labeau PE (2004) The stimulus-driven theory of probabilistic dynamics as a framework for probabilistic safety assessment. In: Proceedings of the PSAM 7—ESREL 2004 conference

  • Izquierdo JM, Melendez E, Devooght J (1996) Relationship between probabilistic dynamics and event trees. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeau PE (1996a) A Monte Carlo estimation of the marginal distributions in a problem of probabilistic dynamics. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeau PE (1996b) Probabilistic dynamics: estimation of generalized unreliability through efficient Monte Carlo simulation. Ann Nucl Energy 23:1355–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeau PE, Smidts C, Swaminathan S (2000) Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 68:219–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou IA (1994) Markovian reliability analysis of dynamic systems. In: Aldemir T, Siu N, Mosleh A, Cacciabue PC, Goktepe BG (eds) Reliability and safety assessment of dynamic process systems, NATO ASI Series F, vol 120. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 24–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiss WG (1999) Petri nets for reliability modeling. LiLoLe Publishing, Hagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu N (1994) Risk assessment for dynamic-systems—an overview. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 43:43–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smidts C, Devooght J (1992) Probabilistic reactor dynamics-II: a Monte Carlo study of a fast reactor transient. Nucl Sci Eng 111:241–256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Chandrakar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandrakar, A., Nayak, A.K. & Vinod, G. Reliability analysis of process controlled systems considering dynamic failure of components. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6, 93–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0248-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0248-z

Keywords

Navigation