Skip to main content
Log in

MTSF (mean time to system failure) and profit analysis of a single-unit system with inspection for feasibility of repair beyond warranty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discussed the MTSF and profit analysis of a single-unit system with inspection for feasibility of repair beyond warranty subject to a single repair facility. Any failure during warranty is rectified by the manufacturer free of cost to the users provided failures are not due to the negligence of users. Beyond warranty, unit goes under inspection after failure for feasibility of its repair or replacement. The failure time of the system follows negative exponential distribution while repair and inspection time distributions are taken as arbitrary. The expressions for reliability, MTSF, availability of the system and profit function have been determined by using supplementary variable technique. Using Abel’s lemma steady state behavior of the system has been derived. The numerical results for reliability and profit function are also obtained by taking particular values of various parameters and repair cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Refrences

  • Balagurusamy E (2009) Reliability engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1962) Renewal theory. John Wiley & Sons INC, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Lin Li, Jun Ni (2009) Option model for joint production and preventive maintenance system. Inter J Prod Econ 119:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadyan MS, Promila Kumar J (2013) Reliability modeling of a single-unit system with arbitrary distribution subject to different weather condition. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5(3):313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur M, Lal AK, Bhatia SS, Reddy AS (2013) Numerical solution of stochastic partial differential difference equation arising in reliability engineering. Appl Math Comput 219:7645–7652

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kharoufeh JP, Solo CJ, Ulukus MY (2010) Semi-Markov models for degradation-based reliability. IIE Trans 42:599–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu K, Nishida T (1987) One-unit system with a failure rate depending upon the degree of repair. Math Jpn 32(1):139–147

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ram Niwas.

Appendices

Appendix

The derivation of Eqs. (1)–(5)

Assuming failure rates of the system are constant and repair rates are arbitrary. By applying supplementary variable technique, we develop the following differential-difference equations associated with the state transition diagram (Fig. 1) of the system at times (t + Δt), (y + Δy) and (x + Δx).

Fig. 1
figure 1

State Transition Diagram of the Model

$$p_{0} (t + \varDelta t) = p_{0} (t)\left( {1 - \left( {\alpha + \lambda } \right)\varDelta t} \right) + \int_{0}^{\infty } {\mu (x)p_{2} (x,t)\varDelta tdx + o(\varDelta t),}$$

\(p_{1} (t + \varDelta t) = p_{1} (t)\left( {1 - \lambda_{1} \varDelta t} \right) + \alpha p_{0} (t) + \int_{0}^{\infty } {\mu_{1} (x)p_{4} (x,t)\varDelta tdx + } \int_{0}^{\infty } {qh(y)p_{3} (y,t)\varDelta tdy + o(\varDelta t),}\) \(p_{2} (x + \varDelta x,t + \varDelta t) = p_{2} (x,t)\left( {1 - \mu (x)\varDelta x} \right) + o\left( {\varDelta x,\varDelta t} \right),\)

$$p_{3} (y + \varDelta y,t + \varDelta t) = p_{3} (y,t)\left( {1 - h(y)\varDelta y} \right) + o\left( {\varDelta y,\varDelta t} \right),$$
$$p_{4} (x + \varDelta x,t + \varDelta t) = p_{4} (x,t)\left( {1 - \mu_{1} (x)\varDelta x} \right) + o\left( {\varDelta x,\varDelta t} \right),$$

The proof of Theorem-1

Proof

Taking Laplace transforms of Eqs. (38) and (39), using (9), we get

$$\left[ {s + \lambda + \alpha } \right]p_{0} (s) = 1$$
$$\left[ {s + \lambda_{1} } \right]p_{0} (s) = \alpha p_{0} (s)$$

The solution can be written as

$$p_{0} (s) = \frac{1}{{\left( {s + \lambda + \alpha } \right)}}$$
$$p_{1} (s) = \frac{\alpha }{{\left( {s + \lambda + \alpha } \right)\left( {s + \lambda_{1} } \right)}}$$
$$R(s) = p_{0} (s) + p_{1} (s)$$
$$= \frac{1}{{\left( {s + \lambda + \alpha } \right)}} + \frac{\alpha }{{\left( {s + \lambda + \alpha } \right)\left( {s + \lambda_{1} } \right)}}$$

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get

$$R(t) = \exp ( - (\lambda + \alpha )t)\left[ {\frac{{\lambda - \lambda_{1} }}{{\lambda - \lambda_{1} + \alpha }}} \right] + \exp ( - \lambda_{1} t)\left[ {\frac{\alpha }{{\lambda - \lambda_{1} + \alpha }}} \right]$$
(*)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niwas, R., Kadyan, M.S. & Kumar, J. MTSF (mean time to system failure) and profit analysis of a single-unit system with inspection for feasibility of repair beyond warranty. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7 (Suppl 1), 198–204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0362-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0362-6

Keywords

Navigation