Skip to main content
Log in

Usability evaluation of website using combined weighted method: fuzzy AHP and entropy approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usability of the website is a topic of great interest for researchers. The fuzzy MCDM approaches are widely adapted to measure and rank the usability of the website. These measures incorporate human input towards website are subjective in nature. Along with these measures, design dimension and other support features that encourage the user to reach desired information in stipulated time are equally important and should be incorporated in the proposed metric. These functions are objective in nature and hence suitable mathematical model or formulae can be used to evaluate its crisp value. In this paper a novel metric is proposed integrating objective and subjective approach, evaluating usability using fuzzy AHP and entropy method respectively. The proposed metric can be considered more accurate and complete as it includes expert input, experience of end user, design dimension and support features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber S (2010) How fast does a website need to be? http://www.perftestplus.com/resources/how_fast.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2015

  • Bevan N (2001) International standards for HCI and usability. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):1–18

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan N, Kirakowsky J, Maissel J (1991) What is usability. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on human computer interaction, Sept 1991. Elsevier, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringula RP, Basa RS (2011) Factors affecting faculty web portal usability. Educ Technol Soc 14(4):253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caglar E, Mentes SA (2012) The usability of university websites—a study on European University of Lefke. Int J Bus Inf Syst 11(1):22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang E, Dillon TS (2006) A usability-evaluation metric based on a soft-computing approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36(2):356–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 289–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng H (1999) Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Int J Approx Reason 21(3):215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan L (2012) Evaluating the usability of nine Jordanian university websites. In: Proceedings of the international conference on communications and information technology, pp 91–96

  • Hongjiu L, Yanrong H (2015) An evaluating method with combined assigning-weight based on maximizing variance. Sci Program 2015:290379. doi:10.1155/2015/290379

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Proj Manag 22:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Tsuji K (2011) Evaluation of usage of university websites in Bangladesh. DESIDOC J Libr Inf Technol 31(6):469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Cui J (2008) Entropy coefficient method to evaluate the level of sustainable development of China’s sports. Int J Sport Sci Eng 2(2):72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghadehi MZ, Mikaeil R, Ataei M (2009) The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8218–8226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal R, Mehrotra D, Sharma A, Bhatia P (2013) ANFIS method for usability assessment of website of an educational institute. World Appl Sci J 23(11):1489–1498

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal R, Mehrotra D, Bhatia PK, Sharma A (2015a) FAHP approach to rank educational websites on usability. Int J Com Dig Syst 4(4):251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal R, Mehrotra D, Kumar Bhatia P, Sharma A (2015b) Rank university websites using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach on usability. Int J Inf Eng Electron Bus 7(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, Boston. ISBN: 0-12-518405-0

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Savoia A (2001) Web page response time. Softw Test Eng Mag 48–53

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Yang S, Li K, Yu B (2012) Developing an evaluation approach for software trustworthiness using combination weights and TOPSIS. J Softw 7(3):532–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrente MCS, Prieto ABM, Gutiérrez DA, De Sagastegui MEA (2013) Sirius: a heuristic-based framework for measuring web usability adapted to the type of website. J Syst Softw 86(3):649–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Senecal S (2007) Measuring perceived website usability. J. Internet Commer 6(4):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II. Inf Sci (NY) 8(4):301–357

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Polytechnic W (2015) Application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating index in fuzzy mathematics for wine quality assessment. Adv J Food Sci Technol 7(3):195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Z, Yun Y, Sun J (2006) Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci 18(5):1020–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renuka Nagpal.

Appendix

Appendix

  1. 1.

    Check the availability of the fee structure in the given web site of college.

  2. 2.

    Find the hostel details of the given college.

  3. 3.

    Find the placement details of the given college.

  4. 4.

    Find the details of the placements in regard to students who got placed during campus recruitment process.

  5. 5.

    Find the in-campus services (medical facility, canteen, sports facility) mentioned in the given website of a college.

  6. 6.

    Find the services offered by library in the given website of a college.

  7. 7.

    Find the details of the available departments in the given website of a college.

  8. 8.

    Check the availability of news and events of a college in the given website.

  9. 9.

    Find the details of research and development department in the website of a given college.

  10. 10.

    Check the availability of alumni details in the given website of the college.

  11. 11.

    Check for circular and notices.

  12. 12.

    Are you able to find the “CONTACT US” tab on the home page.

  13. 13.

    Is any “PHOTO GALLERY” available.

  14. 14.

    Information regarding the MOUs and accreditation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D. & Bhatia, P.K. Usability evaluation of website using combined weighted method: fuzzy AHP and entropy approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7, 408–417 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0462-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0462-y

Keywords

Navigation