Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of project management issues in information technology industry: an overview of literature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Industries many projects are undertaken for execution for a specific purpose. This stands in contrast with business as usual (or operations), which are repetitive, permanent, or semi-permanent functional activities to produce products or services. In practice, the management of these two systems is often quite different, and as such requires the development of distinct technical skills and management strategies. It has been observed that the challenges which project managers face are unrealistic deadlines, communication deficit, scope creep, failure in risks management etc. These challenges can lead a project to failure or can lead to schedule and/or budget overrun. As per a survey done in 2011 just for IT industry projects, it was observed that only 37 % of projects were completed as per original plan, rest of the projects either were challenged and exceeded the original baseline OR got scrapped. More than $1 trillion was the financial burden due to IT project failure in the US alone. It is evident from this statistics that organizations need to manage projects efficiently and effectively. This paper attempts to discuss the key variables which decide the fate of an IT project. As per the analysis done these factors, if paid attention to, can help project managers to keep the project on track. Some of the papers on construction industry (other projectized industry) also were studied to check for similarity or difference in the challenges with respect to IT industry. It has also been discussed some of the statistical techniques which authors are using for further studies for developing the models. Based on the studies and research made so far it has been found that there is very large financial impact due very low rate of project execution success with respect to the scope, schedule and cost baselines. Authors studied dependent (challenges in project management), independent (stakeholder management, risk management etc.), moderating and intervening variables for this challenge. Authors found out that there are 6 major independent variables viz. stakeholder management, baseline definition (scope, schedule, cost and quality), communication management, human resources and their skillset, risk and issue management, project control methodology, which impacts the success of the project if not managed properly. Authors are further carrying out the research to develop a model using statistical techniques like discriminant analysis using these variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktan S (2011), Early warning system for bankruptcy: bankruptcy prediction. http://www.d-nb.info/1019790032/34

  • Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance 23(4):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ante R, Ana K (2013) Discriminant analysis for bank profitability level. Croat Oper Res Rev 4:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz NE (1987) Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 34(4):393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne L, Walker DHT (2006) Using a visualizing tool to study stakeholder influence—two australian examples. Proj Manag J 37(1):5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cătoiu I, Ţichindelean M (2013) Using discriminant analysis in relationship marketing. Ann Univ Apulensis Ser Oecon 15(2):727–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty S, Whitten D, Green KW (2008) Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: client orientation and promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. J Comput Inf Syst 48(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Romano NC, Nunamaker JF Jr (2006) A collaborative project management approach and a framework for it’s supporting Systems. J Int Technol Inf Manag 15:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis J (2012) The importance of great project managers in project management technology http://quotient.net/blog/2012/6/25/the-importance-of-a-great-project-manager/

  • Dubey S (2011) Key success factors in software development projects. SSRN Electron J. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1952935

    Google Scholar 

  • Egorova E, Wohlin C, Aurum A, Berntsson R (2009) Stakeholders perception of success: an empirical investigation, Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2009. SEAA ‘09. 35th Euromicro Conference Aug 2009

  • Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A (2011) Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harward Business, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajare Y, Attarde P, Parbat DK (2016) Assessment of significant causes and effects of delays on the projects completion period. Int J Mod Trends Eng Res 2(2):88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudienėa N, Banaitisa A, Banaitienėa N, Lopes J (2013), Development of a conceptual critical success factors model for construction projects: a case of Lithuania, 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013

  • Guérin DM (2012) Project management in the construction industry. Brandeis University, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim NI, Chileshe N, Baroudi B (2012) Management challenges within multiple project environments: lessons for developing countries, Australian journal of construction economics and building conference series. University of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen K Pau L-F (2009) ERP project’s internal stakeholder network and how it influences the project’s outcome: social science research network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440687

  • Jethani K (2013) Software metrics for effective project management. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4(4):335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen A, Eik-Andresen P, Ekambaram A (2014) Stakeholder benefit assessment—project success through management of stakeholders, 27th IPMA World Congress. Soc Behav Sci 119(2014):581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen M, Sjøberg DIK (2004) The impact of customer expectation on software development effort estimates. Int J Proj Manag 22(4):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard D, Miller R (2001) Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. MIT Sloan School of Management Sloan Working Paper 4214-01

  • Mirza MN, Pourzolfaghar Z, Shahnazari M (2013) Significance of scope in project success, CENTERIS 2013, International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies

  • Montero G, Onieva L, Palacin R (2015), Selection and implementation of a set of key performance indicators for project management, researchgate. http://www.Researchgate.net/publication/283825288

  • Muir B (2005) Challenges facing today’s construction manager. University of Delaware, Fall, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir Uddin Md, Meah Siraz, Hossain Raihan (2013) Discriminant analysis as an aid to human resource selection and human resource turnover minimization decisions. Int J Bus Manag 8(17):2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasirzadeh F, Khanzadi M, Rezaie M (2013) System dynamics approach for quantitative risk allocation. Int J Ind Eng Prod Res 24(3):237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprea D, Mesnita G (2006) The information systems documentation—another problem for project management: Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=946785

  • Pan C-G, Chen Y-Wu (2008) An optimization model of CMMI-based software project risk response planning. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2:2008-02-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute (2013) Pulse of the Profession—in-depth report: the essential role of communications. http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/The-High-Cost-Low-Performance-The-Essential-Role-of-Communications.ashx. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • Ramaprasad A, Prakash AN, Rammurthy N (2013) Learning the construction project management system (CPMS): an ontological method. PMI Research and Education Conference, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammurthy N, Varsha BN (2012): Architecting framework for managing stakeholders in construction projects. National Conference on Contemporary Civil Engineering Research and Practices—CCERP 2012

  • Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M, Cule P (2001) Identifying software project risks: an international Delhi study. J Manag Inf Syst Spring 17(4):5–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Terlizzi MA, de Souza Meirelles F, de Moraes HROC (2016) Barriers to the use of an IT project management methodology in a large financial institution. Int J Proj Manag 34(3):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EW, Marr MJ, Thomas A, Hume RM, Walker N (2013), Using Discriminant analysis to identify student at risk. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE ‘96. 26th Annual Conference., vol 1, pp 185–188

  • Whitney KM, Lombard MEM, Daniels CB (2013) The root cause of failure in complex it projects: complexity itself. Conference Organized by Missouri University of Science and Technology, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulch B (2014) Leadership communication in project management, 27th IPMA World Congress. Soc Behav Sci 119(2014):172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinayak J. Oak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oak, V.J., Laghate, K. Analysis of project management issues in information technology industry: an overview of literature. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7, 418–426 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0469-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0469-4

Keywords

Navigation