Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability prediction of seismic switch for early detection of earthquakes around NPPs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent Fukushima accident has posed several challenges to nuclear community with respect to safety of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) during simultaneous occurrence of seismic, Tsunami, multiple failures of safety systems and also maintaining the long term sub criticality during these events. Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs) are used in many application areas to reduce the likelihood of such severe accidents and/or to mitigate the consequences. An indigenously developed seismic switch is employed to safely shut down the reactor upon the occurrence of a seismic event. The reliability of seismic switch is of vital importance to ensure safe operation of a NPP. This paper presents the results of reliability study performed on digital and analog seismic switches to assess their performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

G :

Reliability growth failure rate multiplier

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits _{\text{C }}\) :

Capacitance failure rate multiplier

λOB :

Base failure rate, operating

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{DCO }}\) :

Failure rate multiplier for duty cycle, operating

TO :

Failure rate multiplier for temperature, operating

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{S }}\) :

Failure rate multiplier for stress

λ EB :

Base failure rate, environmental

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{DCN}}\) :

Failure rate multiplier, duty cycle—non operating

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{TE}}\) :

Failure rate multiplier, temperature–environment

\(\lambda_{\text{TCB }}\) :

Base failure rate, temperature cycling

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{CR}}\) :

Failure rate multiplier, cycling rate

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{DT}}\) :

Failure rate multiplier, delta temperature

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{SJB}}\) :

Base failure rate, solder joint

\(\mathop \prod \nolimits_{\text{SJDT}}\) :

Failure rate multiplier, solder joint delta temperature

λ EOS :

Failure rate, electrical overstress

λb :

Base failure rate

K :

Mating/unmating factor

P :

Active pins factor

E :

Environment factor

T :

Temperature factor

A :

Application factor

Q :

Quality factor

CC :

Contact construction factor

MTBF:

Mean time between failure

References

  • Hai T, Lu L (2014) A quantitative software testing method for hardware and software integrated systems in safety critical applications, Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM 12, June 2014

  • International Electro technical Commission (1998) “IEC 61508 First Edition: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety—related systems”

  • MIL-HDBK-338B (1998) Electronic reliability design handbook

  • Relex Architect (2008) Relex Reliability Studio

  • RIAC-HDBK-217Plus (2006) Reliability prediction models

  • Technology Transfer Document: Digital Seismic Switch (2015)

  • MIL-HDBK-217F (1991) Reliability prediction of electronic equipment, Notice 1 and Notice 2

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai. We thank our guides from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Sreekanth Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reddy, S.V.S., Rajangam, K., Santhosh, T.V. et al. Reliability prediction of seismic switch for early detection of earthquakes around NPPs. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7, 325–331 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0501-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0501-8

Keyword

Navigation