Skip to main content
Log in

Preventive maintenance task balancing with spare parts optimisation via big-bang big-crunch algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work balancing increasingly plays an important role in both the production and maintenance functions. However, the literature on work balancing problems in transfer line manufacturing systems provides little information on the contributions of maintenance technicians and spare parts with a focus on penalty, technicians’ costs and incentives for staff. Unlike existing reports, the current investigation attempts to solve the maintenance task balancing problem. It combines preventive maintenance technicians’ assignments with product demand and spares utilisation in a transfer line manufacturing system. It uses an optimisation framework that measures the success of post-line balancing solution performance in a system from a holistic perspective. The novelty of the approach lies in the integration of technicians and spare parts theory and the introduction of penalty, technicians’ costs and incentive for staff. The proposed optimisation method was applied to a case study for detergent manufacturing system as a means of testing the effectiveness and robustness of the approach. The results show that the proposed model appears to be effective. Some simulations were also carried out to complement practical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bautista J, Pereira J (2007) Ant algorithm for time and space constrained assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 177:2016–2032

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista J, Pereira J (2009) A dynamic programming based heuristic for the assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 194:787–794

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista J, Pereira J (2011) Procedures for the time and space constrained assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 212:473–481

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Belmokaddem M, Mekidiche M, Sahed A (2008) Application of a fuzzy goal programming approach with different importance and priorities to aggregate production planning. J Appl Quant Methods 4(3):317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2009) Production planning of mixed-model assembly lines: overview and extensions. Prod Plan Control 20(5):455–471

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chica M, Cordon O, Damas S, Bautista J (2011) Including different kinds of preferences in a multi-objective ant algorithm for time and space assembly line balancing on different Nissan scenarios. Expert Syst Appl 38:709–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht AP (2007) Artificial intelligence: an introduction. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Erol-Osman K, Ibrahim E (2006) New optimisation method: big-bang big-crunch. Adv Eng Softw 37(2):106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faira J, Natos M, Numes E (2006) Optimal design of work-in-process buffers. Int J Prod Econ 99:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Hira DS (2008) Operations research. S. Chand, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong DS, Cho HS (2001) Dual criteria assembly line balancing for single-model and deterministic problems using simulated annealing. Intell Autom Soft Comput 7(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ighravwe DE, Oke SA (2014) A nonzero integer non-linear programming model for maintenance workforce sizing. Int J Prod Econ 150:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ighravwe DE, Oke SA, Adebiyi KA (2015) Maintenance workload optimisation with accident occurrence considerations and absenteeism from work using a genetic algorithm. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag. doi:10.1080/17509653.2015.1065208

    Google Scholar 

  • Law AM, Kelton WD (2000) Simulation modelling and analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence SR, Buss AH (1994) Shifting production bottleneck: causes, cures and conundrums. J Prod Oper Manag 3(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour MAA-F (2011) Solving the periodic maintenance scheduling problem via genetic algorithm to balance workforce levels and maintenance cost. Am J Eng Appl Sci 4(2):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood S (2006) Line balancing and simulation of an automated production transfer line. Assem Autom 26(1):69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGovern SM, Gupta SM (2007) A balancing method and genetic algorithm for disassembly line balancing. Eur J Oper Res 179:692–708

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patti AL, Watson K, Blackstone JH (2008) The shape of protective capacity in unbalanced production systems with unplanned downtime. Prod Plan Control 9(5):486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell SG, Pyke DF (1997) Buffering unbalanced assembly systems. IIE Trans 30(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana RS, Purohit R (2012) Balancing of maintenance task during preventive maintenance of four wheeler. Int J Eng Res Appl 2(3):496–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Rardin RL (1998) Optimisation in operations research. Prentice-Hill, Incorporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivel S, Pandiyan SA, Marikani S, Selvi SK (2013) Application of big-bang big-crunch algorithm for optimal power flow problems. Int J Eng Sci 2(4):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyed-Alagheband SA, Ghomi SMTF, Zandieh M (2010) A simulated annealing algorithm for balancing the assembly line type II problem with sequence-dependent setup times between tasks. Int J Prod Res 49(3):805–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin D, Min H (1991) Uniform assembly line balancing with stochastic task times in Just-in-time manufacturing. Int J Oper Prod Manag 11(8):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sungur B, Yavuz Y (2015) Assembly line balancing with hierarchical worker assignment. J Manuf Sys 37(1):290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z (2008) Hybrid multi-objective optimisation models for managing pavement assets. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Oke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ighravwe, D.E., Oke, S.A. & Adebiyi, K.A. Preventive maintenance task balancing with spare parts optimisation via big-bang big-crunch algorithm. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 2), 811–822 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0529-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0529-9

Keywords

Navigation