Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of shutdown period extension on core damage frequency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the reduction possibilities of the CDF of LPSD conditions in a typical Westinghouse type PWR. For this, a comprehensive LPSD PSA model has been developed for a typical nuclear power plant (NPP). Total LPSD CDF is estimated to be 2.27E−06/year, assuming refueling outage as shutdown representative. To decrease it, CDF of LPSD conditions is re-evaluated for sensitivity case with shorter shutdown period. The results represent 13% decrease in total CDF of LPSD conditions. The contribution of CDF of the most dominant POSs changes from 66.24 to 10.45%, for POS 9 and POS 7, to 70.20 and 1.99%, respectively. The study also shows the proportionality of the change in percent contributions of POS_CDF in total CDF of LPSD conditions with that of POS duration in total duration of LPSD conditions. In this regards, percent change in CDF of POS 7 and POS 5 whose durations undergoes −4.76 and 3.31%, respectively, is −83.38 and 65.5%. Changes in CDF of POSs are also compared. Change in CDF of POSs is proportional to change in POS duration. However, for POS 9 and POS 7, with the higher primary contribution in total CDF of LPSD conditions, the percent change is more conspicuous. The study also shows the proportionality of the change in percent contributions of POS_CDF in total CDF of LPSD conditions with that of POS duration in total duration of LPSD conditions. Therefore, it is concluded that shortening of POSs with higher contributions (yet might not with longer duration) in total duration of LPSD conditions, leads to more decrease in total CDF of LPSD conditions. The results are useful for outage planning and management decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The reactor is already tripped and the plant conditions may significantly differ from the conditions at power.

References

  • Apostolakis GE (2004) How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Anal 24(3):515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASME/ANS-RA-Sa-2009 (2009) Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008 Standard for Level l/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Application. American Society of Mechanical Engineering

  • Cid MM, Dies J, Tapia C, Viñals O (2011) Quantification of A 3 loops westinghouse PWR outage key safety functions using probabilistic safety assessment. In: ANS PSA 2011 international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis

  • EPRI-TR-1003465 (2002) Low power and shutdown risk assessment benchmarking study. Electric Power research Institute

  • EPRI-TR-1003113 (2001) Final Report: November 2001. An analysis of loss of decay heat removal trends and initiating event frequencies (1989–2000). Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA

  • EPRI-TR-1013501 (2005) Qualitative risk assessment methods for shutdown risk management. Electric Power research Institute

  • EPRI-TR-1013501 (2006) Qualitative risk assessment methods for shutdown risk management. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA

  • EPRI-TR-1016231 (2007) Development of a shutdown qualitative risk assessment standard. Electric Power research Institute

  • Garrick BJ, Christie RF (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment practices in the USA for nuclear power plants. Saf Sci 40:177–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA-TECDOC-1144 (2000) Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes. International Atomic energy Agency

  • IAEA-TECDOC-1200 (2001) Applications of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency

  • IAEA-TECDOC-611 (1991) Use of plant specific PSA to evaluate incidents at nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency

  • IAEA-TECDOC-751 (1994) PSA for the shutdown mode for nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency

  • Karimi K, Yousefpour F, Tehranifard AA, Pourgol Mohamad M (2014) Assessment of human error importance in PWR PSA, Romanian J Phys 59(7):873–883

  • Keller W, Modarres M (2005) A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 89:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NUREG/CR-1431 (2012) Standard Technical Specifications Westinghouse Plants, Volume 1, Revision 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NUREG/CR-1449 (1993) Shutdown and low-power operation at commercial nuclear power plants in the United States. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NUREG/CR-2300 (1983) PRA procedure guide: a guide to the performance of PRAs for the nuclear power plants. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NUREG/CR-6144 (1995) Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at surry, unit 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NUREG/CR-6890 (2005) Volume 1: reevaluation of station blackout risk at nuclear power plants: analysis of loss of offsite power events: 1986–2004. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NUREG-75/104 (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in US commercial nuclear power plants. WASH 1400, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • Papadopoulos K, Hryciw B, Kaasalainen S (2011) Outage PRA methodology for Multi-Unit CANDU Generating Stations. In: ANS PSA 2011 international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis

  • Ram M (2013) On system reliability approaches: a brief survey. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solovjanov O, Lutz R, Rubbers A (2011) Application of low power and shutdown PSA insights to development and implementation of full scope severe accident management guidelines covering all plant operating states for VVER and PWR in Europe. In: ANS PSA 2011 international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis

  • U.S.NRC (1988) Generic Letter 88-20: Individual plant examination for severe accident vulnerabilities. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • 10 CFR Part 52 (2016) Early site permits; standard design certification; and combined licenses for nuclear power plants. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Shahabeddin Kamyab

  2. Nuclear Science and Technology Research Center, Tehran, Iran

    Faramarz Yousefpour

  3. SURENA Co., Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Yousefi

  4. Young Researchers and Elite Club, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Kaveh Karimi

Authors
  1. Shahabeddin Kamyab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faramarz Yousefpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alireza Yousefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaveh Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faramarz Yousefpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamyab, S., Yousefpour, F., Yousefi, A. et al. Effects of shutdown period extension on core damage frequency. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8, 612–624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0643-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0643-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation