Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of BOCR models in service oriented architecture (SOA): study on model validation through quantification for QoS considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the competitive market place, most organizations are going through a digital transformation to enhance the customer experience and reduce the risk, therefore quality of service (QoS), specifically performance, is becoming center stage in building real world applications. In building real world applications, two challenges are fundamental: firstly, how we effectively build models for performance under uncertainty, and secondly, in what way we validate the models through quantification. Consequently, our study reveals a significant research that has been underway and continue to be happening on the first part on model development, however, a limited research is in progress on QoS quantification in SOA applications. Hence, we attempted to fill the gap. Therefore, in this paper, we propose benefits–opportunities–cost–risk (BOCR) models for quantification of various QoS influencing factors using analytic network process (ANP) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We introduce an efficient algorithm for the first time based on BOCR–AHP/ANP methodology that validates the performance of real-world SOA applications. Most importantly, here in this paper, considered expert judgements and historical data from the in-the-field and on-the-project expertise to validate SOA–QoS making our proposed unique from other traditional practices. A case study has been carried out to validate the proposed approach and presented the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chao L, Qing L (2008) Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. Int J Proj Manag 26(8):810–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedela RK, Valurouthu KP (2016a) Digital transformation with service oriented architecture and performance considerations. Int J Comput Appl 148:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedela RK, Valurouthu KP (2016b) Evidence informed performance modelling of complex business process using queueing petri nets (QPN). Int J Comput Syst 3(6):462–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedela RK, Duyu F, Cullen M, Cadavez J, Prasad VK (2011) Maximizing the business value from silos: service based transformation with service data models. In: Proceedings of 2011 annual IEEE conference, pp 1–6

  • Gedela RK, Duyu F, Prasad VK (2013) Evidence informed layered queuing model (EI-LQM) for performance management of enterprise service oriented architecture (ESOA) applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference, pp 1–6

  • Lee AHI (2009) A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer–supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Int J Prod Res 47(15):4255–4280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI, Chang HJ, Lin CY (2009a) An evaluation model of buyer–supplier relationships in high-tech industry—the case of an electronic components manufacturer in Taiwan. Comput Ind Eng 57(4):1417–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI, Chen HH, Kang HY (2009b) Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms. Renew Energy 34(1):120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Srividya A, Gedela R (2007) Computational analysis of performance for heterogeneous integrated system with test automation. Int J Autom Comput 4(4):353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Verma AK, Srividya A, Gedela RK, Rao GV (2008) Early quantitative software reliability prediction using petrinets. In: Proceedings of the IEEE colloquium and 3rd IEEE international conference on industrial and information systems, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IITK), pp 1–6

  • Mohan KK, Verma AK, Srividya A (2009) Early qualitative software reliability prediction and risk management in process centric development through a soft computing technique. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 16(6):521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Srividya A, Verma AK (2010a) ANP based software reliability prediction using PoCs and subsequent employment of orthogonal defect classification measurements for risk mitigation during prototype studies. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(1):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Verma AK, Srividya A (2010b) Software reliability estimation through black box and white box testing at prototype level. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international conference on reliability, safety and hazard risk based technologies and physics of failure methods, Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC), Mumbai, India, pp 517–522

  • Mohan KK, Verma AK, Srividya A, Papic L (2010c) Integration of black-box and white-box modeling approaches for software reliability estimation. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 18(3):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Verma AK, Srividya A (2011) An effective early software reliability prediction procedure for process oriented development at prototype level employing artificial neural networks. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 18(3):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Srividya A, Verma AK (2016) Prototype dependability model in software—an application using BOCR models. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7(2):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan KK, Prashanthi K, Hull R, Montemagno CD (2018) Risk assessment of a multiplexed carbon nanotube network biosensor. IEEE Sens J 18(11):4517–4528

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) The network hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2004) Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(3):348–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargar LG (2006) Decision making with analytic network process. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarjoughian H, Kim S, Ramaswamy M, Yau S (2008) A simulation framework for service-oriented computing systems. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2008, Miami, Florida, USA, pp 845–853

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was funded and supported by Banking Labs Inc, a Canadian Architecture and Strategy consulting firm. Results from the labs are curated to measure and revise the framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ravi Kumar Gedela or K. Krishna Mohan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gedela, R.K., Mohan, K.K. & Prasad, V.K. Application of BOCR models in service oriented architecture (SOA): study on model validation through quantification for QoS considerations. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9, 1346–1354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0751-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0751-8

Keywords