Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of stochastic flow networks susceptible to demand requirements between multiple sources and multiple destinations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer and communication applications such as big data analytics services, social networks, enterprise business and mobile applications often require to simultaneously pass data of different sizes between multiple source and multiple destinations in the network. In practice, the nodes in the communication networks are often connected through multiple intermediate links of different types with varying failure probabilities. Failure of intermediate links can adversely affect data transmission between source and destination nodes; thus, they can impact the quality of service. Therefore, reliability evaluation of such networks is of subtle importance in today’s service dependent world. This article presents an efficient method for reliability evaluation of stochastic flow networks that can pass various demands simultaneously from multiple source nodes to multiple destination nodes. The proposed method has three steps: First step obtains the combined minimal cut sets between the given set of source and destination nodes. Second step generates the set of simultaneous upper boundary flows for the varying demands using the combined minimal cut sets. Third step calculates the network unreliability by applying the Sum of Disjoint Product method on the upper boundary flows. The reliability of the network, i.e., the probability that the network can simultaneously pass the set of demands, is calculated as 1-Unreliability. The MATLAB simulation of the proposed method on bench mark networks show that the proposed approach takes less computational time than the existing method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball MO (1980) Complexity of network reliability computations. Networks 10:153–165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RE, Wu AS (1978) Coherent systems with multi-state components. Math Oper Res 3:275–281

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Block HW, Savits TH (1982) A decomposition for multistate monotone systems. J Appl Probab 19:391–402

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Goyal NK (2017) An efficient reliability evaluation approach for networks with simultaneous multiple-node-pair flow requirements. Qual Reliaby Eng Int 33:1067–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasheker T, Goyal N (2013) An approach to evaluate multiple node pair reliability for simultaneous capacity requirements. Int J Perform Eng 9:357–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SG, Lin YK (2012) Search for all minimal paths in a general large flow network. IEEE Trans Reliab 61:949–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta E, Goyal NK (2017) Sum of disjoint product approach for reliability evaluation of stochastic flow networks. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:1734–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Neweihi E, Proschan F, Sethuraman J (1978) Multistate coherent systems. J Appl Probab 15:675–688

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ford LR, Fulkerson DR (1962) Flows in networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Forghani-elahabad M, Mahdavi-Amiri N (2016) Reliability assessment of a multi-source multi-sink stochastic-flow network in terms of minimal paths. In: Proceeding of 9th international iranian operation research conference, pp 1065–1069

  • Griffith WS (1980) Multistate reliability models. J Appl Probab 17:735–744

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK (2002a) Overall-terminal reliability of a stochastic capacitated-flow network. Math Comput Model 36:173–181

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK (2002b) Using minimal cuts to evaluate the system reliability of a stochastic-flow network with failures at nodes and arcs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK (2010) Reliability evaluation for overall-terminal multistate flow networks with bi-directed arcs. Expert Syst Appl 37:6669–6674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-K, Huang C-F (2013) Stochastic computer network under accuracy rate constraint from QoS viewpoint. Inf Sci 239:241–252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK, Yeng LCL (2013) Network reliability based decision of Internet with multiple sources and multiple sinks. Decis Support Syst 54:1477–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK, Yuan J (2003) Flow reliability of a probabilistic capacitated-flow network in multiple node pairs case. Comput Ind Eng 45:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra R, Chaturvedi SK (2009) A cutsets-based unified framework to evaluate network reliability measures. IEEE Trans Reliab 58:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esha Datta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Datta, E., Goyal, N.K. Evaluation of stochastic flow networks susceptible to demand requirements between multiple sources and multiple destinations. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10, 1302–1327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00876-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00876-9

Keywords

Navigation