Skip to main content
Log in

Real power loss reduction by enriched great frigatebird, grey forecast and constellation exploration optimization algorithms

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper Enriched Great frigatebird optimization (EGFO) algorithm, Grey forecast algorithm (GFA) and Constellation exploration optimization (CEO) algorithm are applied to solve the power loss decreasing problem. Basically Enriched Great frigatebird optimization (EGFO) algorithm is designed based on the immigration activity and bout action to acquire food from other birds. In EGFO algorithm Canis lupaster algorithm stalking activity and Virus infection algorithms, Robust, Feeble mode (to improve both exploration and exploitation) are integrated. Grey forecast algorithm (GFA) is a modest optimization algorithm with resilient examination ability. Reproduction procedure will create a function that estimates the law (exponential) for predicting the provisional population in descendant’s population through consecutive generations of the population sequence as a time sequence. Constellation exploration optimization (CEO) algorithm is stimulated by faunae examining behaviour in actual natural life. The constellation exploration optimization (CEO) algorithm is executed by means of a set of contender representatives (population) which is entitled as the constellation, and every representative is entitled as an associate. Proposed EGFO, GFA and CEO algorithms are validated in G01–G24 benchmark functions and IEEE test systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • https://www.dattapeetham.org/sgsbirdsparadise/ Accessed on 7.01.2023 ate 13.17 IST

  • Aakash Aakash & Anu Gupta Aggarwal (2022) Assessment of Hotel Performance and Guest Satisfaction through eWOM: Big Data for Better Insights. Int J Hosp Tour Adm 23(2):317–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2020.1746218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal A, Aakash A (2018) Multi-criteria-based prioritisation of B2C e-commerce website. Int J Soc Syst Sci 10(3):201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSS.2018.093940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran G et al (2021) Test scheduling of system-on-chip using dragonfly and ant lion optimization algorithms’. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40:4905–4917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran G, Periyasamy S, Karthikeyan PR (2019) Test scheduling for system on chip using modified firefly and modified ABC algorithms. SN Appl Sci 1:1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1116-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran G, Periyasamy S, Rajamanickam KP (2020) Minimization of test time in system on chip using artificial intelligence-based test scheduling techniques. Neural Comput Appl 32:5303–5312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04039-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Liu L, Guo Y (2016) Shanwai Huang, Multi-objective enhanced PSO algorithm for optimizing power losses and voltage deviation in power systems. COMPEL: Int J Comput Math Electric Electron Eng 35(1):350–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong TL, Duong MQ, Phan VD, Nguyen TT (2020) Optimal reactive power flow for large-scale power systems using an effective metaheuristic algorithm” Hindawi. J Electric Comput Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6382507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmabaki AHS, Kapur PK, Aggarwal AG, Yadavali VSS (2014) The impact of bugs reported from operational phase on successive software releases. Int J Prod Quality Manag 14:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG). Available online: https://icseg.iti.illinois.edu/ieee-30-bus-system/

  • Khazali AH, Kalantar M (2011b) Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33:684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazali H, Kalantar M (2011a) Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(3):684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kose E (2019) LTasci, “Geodetic deformation forecasting based on multi-variable grey prediction model and regression model.” Grey Syst: Theory Appl 9(4):464–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal B, Roy PK (2013) Optimal reactive power dispatch using quasi-oppositional teaching learning based optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei RNS, Sulaiman MH, Mustaffa Z, Daniyal H (2017) Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique. Appl Soft Comput 59:210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouassa S, Bouktir T, Salhi A (2017) Ant lion optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem in power systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(3):885–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan K, Parvathy AK, Arul R (2020) Multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch using levy interior search algorithm. Int J Electr Eng Inf 12:547–570. https://doi.org/10.15676/ijeei.2020.12.3.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuaekaew K, Artrit P, Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2017) Optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a two-archive multi-objective grey wolf optimizer. Expert Syst Appl 87:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polprasert J, Ongsakul W, Dieu VN (2016) Optimal reactive power dispatch using improved pseudo-gradient search particle swarm optimization. Electric Power Compon Syst 44(5):518–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy R, Das T, Mandal KK (2021) Optimal reactive power dispatch using a novel optimization algorithm. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 8:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-021-00041-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahli Z, Hamouda A, Bekrar A, Trentesaux D (2014) Hybrid PSO-tabu search for the optimal reactive power dispatch problem. In: Proceedings of the IECON 2014–40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Dallas, TX, USA, November 2014.

  • Sharma H, Tandon A, Kapur PK et al (2019) Ranking hotels using aspect ratings based sentiment classification and interval-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10:973–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00827-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P Arya R, Titare L, Arya L (2021) optimal load shedding to avoid risks of voltage collapse using black hole algorithm. J Inst Eng India: Series B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-021-00543-3

  • Tandon A, Aakash A, Aggarwal AG (2020) Impact of EWOM, website quality, and product satisfaction on customer satisfaction and repurchase intention: moderating role of shipping and handling. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11(Suppl 2):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00954-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The IEEE 57-Bus Test System [online], available at. https://www.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf57/pg_tca57bus.html

  • The IEEE 118-Bus Test System [online], available https://www.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf118/pg_tca118bus.html

  • Tran HV, Pham TV, Pham LH, Le NT, Nguyen TT (2019) Finding optimal reactive power dispatch solutions by using a novel improved stochastic fractal search optimization algorithm. Telecommun Comput Electronics Control 17(5):2517–2526

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue C, Boyang Q, Jing L (2017) A multi-objective particle swarm optimizer using ring topology for solving multimodal multi-objectiveproblems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 22. 805–817

  • Zhao C, Ding X (2022) A levy flight-based offloading path decision scheme in VANET,” 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET), Chengdu, China, 2022, pp. 985–993, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET55676.2022.9824880

  • https://www.dattapeetham.org/. Accessed on Jan 7 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenin Kanagasabai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Human Participants and/or Animals

No human or animals involved in the research

Informed consent

Single author

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanagasabai, L. Real power loss reduction by enriched great frigatebird, grey forecast and constellation exploration optimization algorithms. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 14, 1933–1954 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02032-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02032-w

Keywords

Navigation