Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overcoming ignorance and the unknown in UAE projects: the role of improvisation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sets out to examine how the effects of ignorance and the unknown in project settings can be overcome through project manager (practitioner) improvisation. Data are obtained from 389 project management practitioners drawn from a range of public, private, and semi-government entities/organizations within the emirate of Sharjah (United Arab Emirates). Sampling is undertaking using an 11 factor ‘ignorance–unknown–improvisation’-focused questionnaire developed from the literature. The variables considered as moderators include ‘self-efficacy’, ‘behavioral integration’, ‘experience’, ‘teamwork quality’, ‘real-time information’, ‘communication’, ‘memory’, ‘knowledge creation’, ‘knowledge sharing’, ‘utilization of documented knowledge’, and ‘age’. Analysis of the data is via Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). The findings of the study suggest the existence of four variables (‘experience’, ‘teamwork quality’, ‘memory’, and ‘age’) that serve to influence the improvisation-based practices that project management practitioners/managers are likely to employ when seeking to overcome the effects of ignorance and the unknown in projects. The findings from the study do facilitate the development of an improvisation-awareness typology that is leaning towards facilitating project management practitioner efficacy as relates to improvisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Adapted from Bond et al. 2015)

Fig. 2

(Adapted from Kim 2012)

Fig. 3

(Adapted from Cunha et al. 2002)

Fig. 4

(Adapted from Chelariu et al. 2002)

Fig. 5

(Adapted from Leybourne and Kennedy 2015)

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahani A, Rahim NZ, Nilashi M (2017) Forecasting social CRM adoption in SMEs: a combined SEM-neural network method. Comput Hum Behav 75:560–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert M, Balve P, Spang K (2017) Evaluation of project success: a structured literature review. Int J Manag Proj Bus 10(4):796–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga J, Branco R, Guedes A, Soares C, da Silveira W (2019) The project manager core competencies to project success. Int J Manag Proj Bus 13(2):277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anantatmula V (2010) Project manager leadership role in improving project performance. Eng Manag J 22(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (2006) Toward a project management theory for renewal projects. Proj Manag J 37(4):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaghani DJ, Asteris PG (2021) A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materialscompressive strength. Neural Comput Appl 33:4501–4532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora R, Mittal R, Aggarwal A, Kapur P (2023) Investigating the impact of effort slippages in software development project. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 14(3):878–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad D, Hughes P (2009) Examining organizational improvisation: the role of strategic reasoning and managerial factors. Int J Soc, Behav, Edu, Econom Manage Eng 3(6):948–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S (2006) Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int J Project Manage 24:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Belitski M, Bui H, Herzig M (2023) Improvisation and innovation in teams: the jazz effect. Br J Manag 34(1):150–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Steen R (2010) The concept of ignorance in a risk assessment and risk management context. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(11):1117–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini D (1999) The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj Manag J 30(4):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi J, Ireland V, Gorod A (2016) Clarifying the project complexity construct: past, present and future. Int J Project Manage 34(7):1199–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken T, Wiik EL (2018) Ignorance and organization studies. Organ Stud 39(8):1109–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra L, Crossan M, Devin L, Leary K, Patton B (2005) Improvisation and teaching negotiation: developing three essential skills. Negot J 21(4):435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansler JP, Havn EC (2004) Improvisation in Information Systems Development. In: Kaplan B, Truex DP, Wastell D, Wood-Harper AT, DeGross JI (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Springer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Görke M, Felix C, Schmidt M (2016) Model-based potential analysis of the distribution logistics: a case study. Product Plan Contr 27(9):698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belout A, Gauvreau C (2004) Factors influencing project success: the impact of human resource management. Int J Project Manage 22:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkenholtz T, Simon G (2022) Introduction to themed issue: ignorance and uncertainty in environmental decision-making. Geoforum 132:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhle F, Heidling E, Schoper Y (2016) A new orientation to deal with uncertainty in projects. Int J Project Manage 34(7):1384–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Gunn JA, Pope J, Retief F (2015) Managing uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance in impact assessment by embedding evolutionary resilience, participatory modelling and adaptive management. J Environ Manage 151:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borgo D (2018). The complex dynamics of improvisation. In: Bader, R. (eds) Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Çakıt E, Karwowski W, Murata A, Olak AJ (2020) Application of structural equation modeling (SEM) and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for assessment of safety culture: an integrated modeling approach. Safety 6(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli A (2008) Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group Org Manag 33(6):712–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli A, Schaubroeck J (2006) Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. Leadersh Q 17:441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan FT, Chong AY (2012) A SEM–neural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances. Decis Support Syst 54:621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelariu C, Johnston WJ, Young L (2002) Learning to improvise, improvising to learn A process of responding to complex environments. J Bus Res 55:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Dainty A, Moore D (2005) What makes a good project manager? Hum Resour Manag J 15(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipulu M, Ojiako U, Marshall A, Williams T, Bititci U, Mota C, Stamati T (2019) A dimensional analysis of stakeholder assessment of project outcomes. Product Plan Contr 30(13):1072–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow C, Sarin R (2002) Known, unknown, and unknowable uncertainties. Theor Decis 52(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicmil S, Williams TT, Hodgson D (2006) Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int J Project Manage 24(8):675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cln LI (2013) Data collection techniques a guide for researchers in humanities and education. Int Res J Comput Sci Inform Syst (IRJCSIS) 2(3):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyer S, Warren CM (2009) Project management approaches for dynamic environments. Int J Project Manage 27:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristina CS, & Udo L (2017). K-MORE-A methodology to manage documented knowledge for reuse. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17). Vancouver, Canada: Design Information and Knowledge.

  • Crossan M (1998) Improvisation in action. Organ Sci 9(5):593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE, Klus L (1996) The Improvising organization: where planning meets opportunity. Organ Dyn 24(4):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha M, Cunha J, Kamoche K (2002). Organizational improvisation: an empirically-based exploration of an innovative management concept. Innovat Res Manage., 1–46.

  • Daase C, Kessler O (2007) Knowns and unknowns in the `War on Terror’: uncertainty and the political construction of danger. Secur Dialogue 38(4):411–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DR (2017) Conceiving Ignorance. Mit Press, In Understanding Ignorance

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DR (2017) The Ethics of Ignorance. Mit Press, In Understanding Ignorance

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DR (2017) Managing Ignorance. Mit Press, In Understanding Ignorance

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K (1997) Strategic Decision Making as Improvisation. In: Papadakis V, Barwise P (eds) Strategic Decisions. Springer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekung S, Adu E, Lashinde A (2020) System pathogens inhibiting construction project risk management performance: deliberate ignorance perspective. J Build Perform 11(1):68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfani A, Ma Z, Cui Q, Baecher G (2023) Ex post project risk assessment: method and empirical study. J Constr Eng Manag 149(2):04022174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleiros F, Kappler C, Pontes FA, Silva SS, Goes FD, Cucick CD (2016) Use of virtual questionnaire and dissemination as a data collection strategy in scientific studies. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem 25(4):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2016) The fallacy of beneficial ignorance: a test of hirschman’s hiding hand. World Dev 84:176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi B, Nhan PV, Iranmanesh M, Ghobakhloo M, Nilashi M, Yadegaridehkordi E (2023) Determinants of intention to use autonomous vehicles: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANFIS. J Retail Consum Serv 70:103158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandomani T, Tavakoli Z, Zulzalil H, Farsani H (2020) The role of project manager in agile software teams: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access 8:117109–117121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner DG, Pierce JL (1998) Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: an empirical examination. Group Org Manag 23(1):48–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemino A, Horner Reich B, Serrador P (2021) Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: is hybrid a poor second choice? Proj Manag J 52(2):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan L, Dulewicz V (2008) Do project managers’ leadership competencies contribute to project success? Proj Manag J 39(4):58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi J, Söderlund J (2016) Project studies and engaged scholarship: directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects. Int J Manag Proj Bus 9(4):767–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi J, Söderlund J (2018) Project studies: what it is, where it is going. Int J Project Manage 36(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi J, Maylor H, Williams T (2011) Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated): a systematic review of the complexities of projects. Int J Oper Prod Manag 31(9):966–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi J, Söderlund J, Marrewijk A (2020) Advancing theory and debate in project studies. Proj Manag J 51(4):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi J, Söderlund J, Marrewijk A (2021) Bright and dark spots in project studies: continuing efforts to advance theory development and debate. Proj Manag J 52(3):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gniaka KJ, Daniel L, El Bachir WM (2019) Gender and improvisation managerial situations in a project context: a comparative study between two countries (France-Senegal). J Res Bus, Econom Manage 13(1):2394–2407

    Google Scholar 

  • Golberg M, Cho H (2004). Introduction to regression analysis. WIT Press.

  • Gross M (2007) The unknown in process: dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Curr Sociol 55(5):742–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadida AL, Tarvainen W, Rose J (2015) Organizational improvisation: a consolidating review and framework. Int J Manag Rev 17:437–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzeh F, Alhussein H, Faek F (2018) Investigating the practice of improvisation in construction. J Manag Eng 34(6):04018039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamzeh F, Faek F, AlHussein H (2019) Understanding improvisation in construction through antecedents, behaviours and consequences. Constr Manag Econ 37(2):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (1989) Dimensions of risk. Risk Anal 9(1):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (1996) What is philosophy of risk? Theoria 62(1–2):169–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haridy S, Ojiako U, Maged A, Al Remeithi M, Bashir H, Shamsuzzaman M (2023) Quality process control and resourcing in manufacturing firms. Product Plan Contr. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2214109,InPress

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow LL (2014) The Essence of Multivariate Thinking Basic Themes and Methods. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır Ö, Ulusoy G (2020) A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects. Int J Prod Econ 223:107522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci 12(4):435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzmeister F, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Weitzel U, Zeisberger S (2020) What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and laypeople. Manage Sci 66(9):3977–4002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ika LA (2018) Beneficial or detrimental ignorance: the straw man fallacy of flyvbjerg’s test of hirschman’s hiding hand. World Dev 103:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ika L, Munro L (2022) Tackling grand challenges with projects: five insights and a research agenda for project management theory and practice. Int J Proj Manage 40(6):601–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ika L, Pinto J (2022) The “re-meaning” of project success: updating and recalibrating for a modern project management. Int J Project Manage 40(7):835–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen A, Thuesen C, Geraldi J (2016) The projectification of everything: projects as a human condition. Proj Manag J 47(3):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin R, Muller R (2016) The relationship between project governance and project success. Int J Project Manage 34(4):613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche K, Pina E, Cunha M (2008) Improvisation and knowledge: the challenge of appropriation. Manage Res 6(2):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Omid M, Mousazadeh H (2014) Prediction of potato yield based on energy inputs using multi-layer adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Measurement 47:521–530

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto A (2008) Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring organisational renewal capability. Int J Technol Manage 42(1/2):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DY, Han SH, Kim H, Park H (2009) Structuring the prediction model of project performance for international construction projects: a comparative analysis. Expert Syst Appl 36:1961–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. D. (2012). Characterizing unknown unknowns. North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, PA: Project Management Institute, (pp. 1–6).

  • Klein L, Biesenthal C, Dehlin E (2015) Improvisation in project management: a praxeology. Int J Project Manage 33:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, L., & Howell, G. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. Proceedings of the PMI research conference, (pp. 293–302).

  • Krylova KO, Vera D, Crossan M (2016) Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge. J Knowl Manag 20(5):1045–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsch E, Hall M (2010) Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. Int J Project Manage 28(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvalnes Ø (2016) Living with the unknown unknown: uncertainty in projects. Proj Manag J 47(3):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechler TG, Edington BH, Goa T (2012) Challenging classic project management: turning project uncertainties into business opportunities. Proj Manag J 43(6):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei P-W, Wu Q (2007) Introduction to structural equation modeling: issues and practical considerations. Educ Meas Issues Pract 26(3):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leybourne S (2009) Improvisation and agile project management: a comparative consideration. Int J Manag Proj Bus 2(4):519–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leybourne S, Kennedy M (2015) Learning to improvise, or improvising to learn: knowledge generation and ‘innovative practice’ in project environments. Knowl Process Manag 22(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leybourne S, Sadler-Smith E (2006) The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. Int J Project Manage 24:483–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liébana-Cabanillas F, Marinković V, Kalinić Z (2017) A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. Int J Inf Manage 37(14):24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim CS, Mohamed MZ (1999) Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int J Project Manage 17(4):243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky S, Tishler A, Dvir D, Shenhar A (1997) The relative importance of project success dimensions. Res Dev Manage 27(2):97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni M, Proserpio L, Hoegl M, Provera B (2009) The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Res Policy 38:1044–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malucelli G, Barbosa MT, Carvalho MM (2019) Facing the challenge of improvisation in project management: a critical review. Int J Manag Proj Bus 14(2):369–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamédio DF, Meyer V Jr (2020) Managing project complexity: how to cope with multiple dimensions of complex systems. Int J Manag Proj Bus 13(4):727–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannucci P, Orazi D, de Valck K (2021) Developing improvisation skills: the influence of individual orientations. Adm Sci Q 66(3):612–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, Ojiako U, Chipulu M (2019a) Risk appetite: a futility, perversity and jeopardy critique of over-optimistic corporate risk taking. Int J Organ Anal 27(1):51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, Ojiako U, Wang V, Lin F, Chipulu M (2019b) Forecasting unknown-unknowns by boosting the risk radar within the risk intelligent organisation. Int J Forecast 35:644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, Ojiako U, Abdoush T, Vasilakos N, Chipulu M (2023) Prudence as an ethical foundation for risk management. Soc Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2022-0244,InPress

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCray GE, Purvis RL, McCray GG (2002) Project management under uncertainty: the impact of heuristics and biases. Proj Manag J 33(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Boyd P (2017) The role of the project manager in relationship management. Int J Project Manage 35(5):717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman C, Miner AS (1998) The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in new product development. J Mark 62(3):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz B, Siemsen E, Kremer M (2014) Judgmental forecasting: cognitive reflection and decision speed. Prod Oper Manag 23(7):1146–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller R, Turner R (2007) The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. Eur Manag J 25(4):298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins JW (2007) Discovering “Unk-Unks.” Mitsloan Manage Rev 48(4):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns AK, Bjeirmi B (1996) The role of project management in achieving project success. Int J Project Manage 14(2):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naresh C, Bose PC, Rao C (2020) Artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for predicting WEDM machining responses of Nitinol alloy: comparative study. SN Appl Sci 2:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisula A-M, Kianto A (2015) The role of knowledge management practices in supporting employee capacity for improvisation. Int J Human Res Manage 27(17):1920–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiako U, Chipulu M, Gardiner P, Williams T, Mota C, Maguire S, Stamati T (2014) Effect of project role, age and gender differences on the formation and revision of project decision judgements. Int J Proj Manage 32:556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiako U, Chipulu M, Marshall A, Ashleigh M, Maguire S, Williams T, Obokoh L (2015) Heterogeneity and perception congruence of project outcomes. Product Plan Contr 26(11):858–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiako U, AlRaeesi E, Chipulu M, Marshall A, Bashir H (2023) Innovation readiness in public sector service delivery: an exploration. Product Plan Contr. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2089266,InPress

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okwu MO, Adetunji O (2018) A comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models in distribution system with nondeterministic inputs. Int J Eng Bus Manage 10:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oun TA, Blackburn TD, Olson BA, Blessner P (2016) An enterprise-wide knowledge management approach to project management. Eng Manage J 28(3):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons V (2007) Searching for “unknown unknowns.” Eng Manag J 19(1):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvan K, Rahmandad H, Haghani A (2015) Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects. J Oper Manag 39:48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriotta G (2019) Imagination, self-knowledge, and poise: jim march’s lessons for leadership. J Manage Stud 56(8):1753–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pender S (2001) Managing incomplete knowledge: Why risk management is not sufficient. Int J Project Manage 19(2):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perminova O, Gustafsson M, Wikström K (2008) Defining uncertainty in projects–a new perspective. Int J Project Manage 26(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrmann-Graham J, Liu J, Cangioni C, Spataro S (2022) Fostering psychological safety: using improvisation as a team building tool in management education. Int J Manage Edu 20(2):100617

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JK, Winch G (2016) The unsettling of “settled science:” The past and future of the management of projects. Int J Project Manage 34:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto J, Davis K, Ika L, Jugdev K, Zwikael O (2022) Coming to terms with project success: current perspectives and future challenges. Int J Project Manage 40(7):831–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman N (1985) Amusing ourselves to death. Viking Penguin Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar G (2008) What is project success: a literature review. Int J Bus Manage 3(9):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressing J (1984) Cognitive processes in improvisation. In Adv Psychol 19:345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, R. (2011, June 21). Enterprise Software Failures Stem From Ignorance, Incompetence. Retrieved December 2020, from Information Week: https://www.informationweek.com/it-leadership/enterprise-software-failures-stem-from-ignorance-incompetence/d/d-id/1098445

  • Purvis RL, McCray GE, Roberts TL (2003). The Impact of Project Management Heuristics to IS Projects. In: 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–7

  • Ramasesh RV, Browning TR (2014) A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. J Oper Manag 32:190–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz JR (1987) Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. Sci Commun 9(1):87–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, J. (2022). Improvisation. In: Advanced Design. Springer, Cham.

  • Rifai A (1996) A note on the structure of the goal-programming model: assessment and evaluation. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(1):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2012) Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown. Manag Learn 44(3):215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin IM, Seelig W (1967) Experience as a factor in the selection and performance of project managers. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 14(3):131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo R, Sbragia R, Abraham S (2017) Unknown unknowns in innovative projects: early signs sensemaking. BAR-Brazilian Admin Rev. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170060,14(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1976) Improvisation Mind 85(337):69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage A (1992) Systems engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin M, Erol R (2017) A comparative study of neural networks and anfis for forecasting attendance rate of soccer games. Math Comput Appl 22(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2016) Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, Edinburgh Gate

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrador P, Turner R (2015) The relationship between project success and project efficiency. Proj Manag J 46(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SK, Joshi A, Sharma H (2016) A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Comput Hum Behav 55:340–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson M (1989) Ignorance and uncertainty. Springer-Velag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stal-Le Cardinal J, Marle F (2006) Project: the just necessary structure to reach your goals. Int J Project Manage 24(3):226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stingl V, Geraldi J (2021) A research agenda for studying project decision-behaviour through the lenses of simple heuristics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 162:120367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A (2010) Keep it complex. Nature 468:1029–1031

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szafranko E, Srokosz PE, Jurczak M, Smieja M (2022) Application of ANFIS in the preparation of expert opinions and evaluation of building design variants in the context of processing large amounts of data. Autom Constr 133:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teimouri R, Amini S (2019) A comprehensive optimization of ultrasonic burnishing process regarding T energy efficiency and workpiece quality. Surf Coat Technol 375:229–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab AG, Karace A, Quigley NR, Tsang EW (2016) Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: the roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning. J Bus Res 69:3500–3507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A (2008) Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strateg Manag J 29(11):1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ul Musawir A, Abd-Karim SB, Mohd-Danuri MS (2020) Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation: a systematic literature review. Int J Proj Manage 38(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venugopal R (2018) Ineptitude, ignorance, or intent: The social construction of failure in development. World Dev 106:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera D, Crossan M (2004) Theatrical improvisation: lessons for organizations. Organ Stud 25(5):727–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ Sci 16(3):203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Bradley J, Liang H (2011) Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. J Knowl Manag 15(2):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadegaridehkordi E, Nilashi M, Nasir MH, Ibrahim O (2018) Predicting determinants of hotel success and development using structural equation modelling (SEM)-ANFIS method. Tour Manage 66:364–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack MH (1999) Managing organizational ignorance knowledge directions. Summer 1:36–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman U, Naeni LM, Huda NU, Khwaja MG (2023) Time flies when you are having fun: the mediating effects of project opportunity management in the relationship between project leaders’ self-efficacy and multidimensional project success. Proj Manag J 54(2):132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarankin TG, Wang S (2013) Making it up as we go: a conceptual model of improvisation in organizations. Int J Organ Theory Behav 16(3):393–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X (2023) Construction risk management research: intellectual structure and emerging themes. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2167303,InPress

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwikael O, Meredith J (2018) Who’s who in the project zoo? The ten core project roles. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(2):474–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alya J. Abuseem.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No.

Human Participants and/or Animals

No.

Informed consent

No.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abuseem, A.J., Ojiako, U. & Dweiri, F.T. Overcoming ignorance and the unknown in UAE projects: the role of improvisation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 15, 871–897 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02165-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02165-y

Keywords

Navigation