Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian and classical inference in Maxwell distribution under adaptive progressively Type-II censored data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the reliability theory and life testing experiments, the Maxwell distribution has established a useful lifetime model due to its increasing failure rate property. To save time and money various types of censoring plans are studied in the literature. One such censoring scheme is adaptive progressive Type-II censoring (APT2C). It has recently become popular in life-testing experiments. The APT2C is a generalization of the progressive censoring scheme and it is very useful in various practical situations when testing material has a long life and high cost. This article deals with the problem of Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation procedures of the unknown parameter and reliability characteristics of Maxwell distribution under the APT2C scheme. The maximum product spacing and the maximum likelihood estimates of the unknown parameters are obtained in the classical approach. In the Bayesian approach, the Bayes estimates are obtained under squared error loss function and linear exponential loss function with two choices of prior densities, non-informative and informative priors, respectively. The Bayes estimates are calculated using Tierney-Kadanae’s approximation and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The asymptotic confidence interval, bootstrap confidence interval, and highest posterior density (HPD) credible interval are constructed for the interval estimation in the case of classical and Bayesian estimation procedures, respectively. Various estimates obtained in the theory are compared with the help of a Monte Carlo simulation study. Finally, a real data set is studied to show the applicability of the considered model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almetwally E, Almongy H, Rastogi M, Ibrahim M (2020) Maximum product spacing estimation of Weibull distribution under adaptive Type-II progressive censoring schemes. Ann Data Sci 7:257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almetwally EM, Almongy HM, ElSherpieny E (2019) Adaptive Type-II progressive censoring schemes based on maximum product spacing with application of generalized Rayleigh distribution. J Data Sci 17(4):802–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala R (2000) Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications. Birkhauser Publisher, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N, Sandhu R (1995) A simple simulational algorithm for generating progressive Type-II censored samples. Am Stat 49(2):229–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker A, Roux J (2005) Reliability characteristics of the Maxwell distribution: a Bayes estimation study. Commun Stat Theory Methods 34(11):2169–2178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi A, Kumar N, Kumar K (2018) Statistical inference for the reliability functions of a family of lifetime distributions based on progressive Type-II right censoring. Statistica 78(1):81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, Kumar J, Tomer SK (2017) Estimation of \({P }\) for Maxwell distribution. J Stat Manag Syst 20(3):467–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-H, Shao Q-M (1999) Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat 8(1):69–92

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Gui W (2020) Statistical analysis of a lifetime distribution with a bathtub-shaped failure rate function under adaptive progressive Type-II censoring. Mathematics 8(5):670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng R, Amin N (1983) Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 45(3):394–403

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC (1963) Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics 5(3):327–339

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Maiti SS (2010) Bayesian estimation of the parameter of Maxwell distribution under different loss functions. J Stat Theory Pract 4(2):279–287

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis. CRC Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7(4):457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui W (2014) Double acceptance sampling plan for time truncated life tests based on Maxwell distribution. Am J Math Manag Sci 33(2):98–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Haj Ahmad H, Salah MM, Eliwa M, Ali Alhussain Z, Almetwally EM, Ahmed EA (2022) Bayesian and non-Bayesian inference under adaptive Type-II progressive censored sample with exponentiated power Lindley distribution. J Appl Stat 49(12):2981–3001

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1988) Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals. Ann Stat 16(3):927–953

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna H, Malik M (2012) Reliability estimation in Maxwell distribution with progressively Type-II censored data. J Stat Comput Simul 82(4):623–641

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna H, Vivekanand V, Kumar K (2015) Estimation in Maxwell distribution with randomly censored data. J Stat Comput Simul 85(17):3560–3578

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar I, Kumar K (2022) On estimation of \(P(V< U)\) for inverse Pareto distribution under progressively censored data. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13(1):189–202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Garg R, Krishna H (2017) Nakagami distribution as a reliability model under progressive censoring. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(1):109–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari A, Kumar K (2023) Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation in log-logistic lifetime model using adaptive progressively censored data. Int J Agric Stat Sci 19(1):17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari A, Kumar S, Kumar K (2022) Multicomponent stress-strength reliability estimation of inverse Pareto lifetime model under progressively censored data. Int J Agric Stat Sci 18(2):475–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathai AM, Haubold HJ (2018) A generalized entropy optimization and Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution. Eur Phys J B 91(39):1–10

    MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44(247):335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan R, Chacko M (2021) Estimation of parameters of Kumaraswamy-exponential distribution based on adaptive Type-II progressive censored schemes. J Stat Comput Simul 91(1):81–107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ng H, Luo L, Hu Y, Duan F (2012) Parameter estimation of three-parameter Weibull distribution based on progressively Type-II censored samples. J Stat Comput Simul 82(11):1661–1678

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ng HKT, Kundu D, Chan PS (2009) Statistical analysis of exponential lifetimes under an adaptive Type-II progressive censoring scheme. Nav Res Logist 56(8):687–698

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols MD, Padgett W (2006) A bootstrap control chart for Weibull percentiles. Qual Reliab Eng Int 22(2):141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saini S, Chaturvedi A, Garg R (2021) Estimation of stress-strength reliability for generalized Maxwell failure distribution under progressive first failure censoring. J Stat Comput Simul 91(7):1366–1393

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saini S, Tomer S, Garg R (2023) Inference of multicomponent stress-strength reliability following Topp–Leone distribution using progressively censored data. J Appl Stat 50(7):1538–1567

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Hahn MG (1999) Maximum product of spacings method: a unified formulation with illustration of strong consistency. Ill J Math 43(3):489–499

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Singh SK, Singh U (2016) Maximum product spacings method for the estimation of parameters of generalized inverted exponential distribution under progressive Type II censoring. J Stat Manag Syst 19(2):219–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobhi MMA, Soliman AA (2016) Estimation for the exponentiated Weibull model with adaptive Type-II progressive censored schemes. Appl Math Model 40(2):1180–1192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman AA, Abd Ellah AH, Abou-Elheggag NA, El-Sagheer RM (2015) Inferences using Type-II progressively censored data with binomial removals. Arab J of Math 4(2):127–139

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney L, Kadane JB (1986) Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 81(393):82–86

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer SK, Panwar M (2015) Estimation procedures for Maxwell distribution under Type-I progressive hybrid censoring scheme. J Stat Comput Simul 85(2):339–356

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi R, Bhattacharya S (1989) Bayes estimation of the Maxwell’s velocity distribution function. Statistica 29(4):563–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi R, Bhattacharya S (1989) A note on the MVU estimation of the Maxwell’s failure distribution. Estadistica 41:73–79

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1975) A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. Stud Bayesian Econom Stat Honor Leonard J Savage 4(3):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Gui W (2021) Statistical inference of exponentiated Pareto distribution under adaptive type-II progressive censored schemes. Communications in statistics-simulation and computation. Taylor and Francis, Oxford, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z-S, Chan P-S, Xie M, Ng HKT (2014) Statistical inference for the extreme value distribution under adaptive Type-II progressive censoring schemes. J Stat Comput Simul 84(5):1099–1114

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Editor-in-Chief and anonymous referees for their useful suggestions that have led to significant improvement in the previous version of the manuscript.

Funding

There is no specific funding obtained for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kapil Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, A., Kumar, K. & Kumar, I. Bayesian and classical inference in Maxwell distribution under adaptive progressively Type-II censored data. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 15, 1015–1036 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02185-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-02185-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation