Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognition in Manual Assembly

  • Fachbeitrag
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manual assembly conducted by skilled human workers is of outstanding relevance for flexible production with high precision. Nevertheless, due to capacity limitations humans need to be supported during the working process in order to reduce mental workload and for enhancement of performance. Cognitive technical systems are able to do so by adapting the process of production to the properties of human cognitive processes which are relevant in manual assembly. During manual assembly tasks workers are confronted with various sources of information and have to switch rapidly between different tasks. The complexity of task execution can be reduced by appropriate information presentation and planning of work steps. Firstly, information processing during the working process can be supported by attentional guidance while reducing search times and accelerating assembly execution. Secondly, as there exist many possible assembly sequences for one product the optimal order of single assembly steps has to be found and interferences from previous task steps have to be minimized. The article describes two scenarios for the investigation of attention allocation as well as for the investigation of task sequences and gives a summary of results achieved so far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaeh MF, Wiesbeck M, Stork S, Schubö A (2009) A multi-dimensional measure for determining the complexity of manual assembly operations. Prod Eng 3(4–5):489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wickens CD, Carswell CM (2006) Information processing. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 111–149

    Google Scholar 

  3. Posner M, Snyder C, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller HJ, Rabbitt PM (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2):315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Theeuwes J (1994) Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection. Perception 23(4):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat Rev Neurosci 5:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stork S, Stößel C, Schubö A (2008) The influence of instruction mode on reaching movements during manual assembly. In: Holzinger A (ed) HCI and usability for education and work. LNCS, vol 5298. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 161–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Stork S, Hild I, Wiesbeck M, Zaeh MF, Schubö A (2010) Finding relevant items: attentional guidance improves visual selection processes. In: Holzinger A, Miesenberger K (eds) HCI and usability for e-inclusion. LNCS, vol 5889. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 69–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Stößel C, Wiesbeck M, Stork S, Zäh MF, Schubö A (2008) Towards optimal worker assistance: investigating cognitive processes in manual assembly. In: Proc of the 41st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, pp 245–250

  10. Allport DA, Styles EA, Hsieh S (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltà C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance XV: conscious and non conscious information processing, pp 421–452

  11. Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7:134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waszak F, Hommel B, Allport A (2003) Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cogn Psychol 46(4):361–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research was conducted in the project “Adaptive Cognitive Interaction in Production Environments” (ACIPE) in the Excellence Cluster “Cognition for Technical Systems” (CoTeSys) supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. Moreover, we want to thank Isabella Hild, Christian Stößel, Laura Voss, Mathey Wiesbeck and Alexander Bannat for their contributions to the experiments, as well as Jared Pool for proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimental Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany

    Sonja Stork & Anna Schubö

Authors
  1. Sonja Stork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Schubö
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Stork.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stork, S., Schubö, A. Cognition in Manual Assembly. Künstl Intell 24, 305–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-010-0054-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-010-0054-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation