Abstract
While bringing portability and convenience to their users, the small screen size of mobile devices raises the concern that it might impact a user’s acquisition of spatial knowledge. Visualizing information of off-screen objects on mobile device has thus been introduced as a possible way to overcome this problem. Some approaches encode the distance to off-screen objects very well, but they have not considered the identities of objects, which could serve as easily-recognizable landmarks of recognition. Other approaches have addressed the visualization of distant objects’ identities as landmarks, but they have not considered the representation of distance to their actual locations. Following these approaches, this study introduces the use of visual variable size in the design of symbols for off-screen landmarks to translate both information about both direction and distance. To further investigate the efficiency of using these graduated size symbols, we apply ratio and ordinal levels of measurement to assign size to the symbols. Results show, size at the ordinal level leads to higher efficiency in understanding distance to off-screen locations. Both designs, however, yield challenges in participants’ understanding of distance based on the symbol’s size. As the initial step of investigating the use of visual variables in the design of symbols for off-screen landmarks, we suggest more visual variables be considered in follow-up designs to provide a more comprehensive understanding regarding the effectiveness of visualizing off-screen landmarks on mobile devices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45936/459361b1af2585445fdd31ac9585d1f65f4d0622" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a34a/6a34acd75b79faa05144f41247b6ac780396eed0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeee9/aeee9e35769fe9d9b587ad1099099c7ac1e07946" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e440b/e440b4a6dc9895917c5980322a71de1164ead0f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22738/227388a73fc50198f0be5f472b7b667ac25c863f" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Speake J, Axon S (2012) “I never use ‘maps’ anymore”: engaging with Sat Nav technologies and the implications for cartographic literacy and spatial awareness. Cartogr J 49:326–336
Parush A, Ahuvia S, Erev I (2007) Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: Spatial information theory. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 238–254
Schimid F (2008) Knowledge-based wayfinding maps for small display cartography. J Locat Based Serv 2:57–83
Burigat S, Chittaro L (2011) Visualizing references to off-screen content on mobile devices: a comparison of arrows, wedge, and overview + detail. Interact Comput 23:156–166
Michon P-E, Denis M (2001) When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory, LNCS, vol 2205. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 292–305
Raper J, Gartner G, Karimi H, Rizos C (2007) A critical evaluation of location based services and their potential. J Locat Based Serv 1:5–45
Waters W, Winter S (2011) A wayfinding aid to increase navigator independence. J Spat Inform Sci 3:103–122
Lovelace KL, Hegarty M, Montello DR (1999) Elements of good directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Spatial information theory: cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science, LNCS 1661. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–82
Li R, Fuest S, Schwering A (2014) The effects of different verbal route instructions on spatial orientation. The 17th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Castellon, Spain
Robinson AH, Morrison JL, Muehrcke PC, Kimerling AJ, Guptill SC (1995) Elements of cartography, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
Parasuraman R (2000) Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics 43:931–951
Raubal M, Winter S (2002) Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egen-hofer MJ, Mark DM (eds) Geographic information science. Volume 2478 of Lecture notes in computer science, LNCS, vol 2478. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–259
Dillemuth J, Goldsberry K, Clarke KC (2007) Choosing the scale and extent of maps for navigation with mobile computing systems. J Locat Based Serv 1:46–61
Ishikawa T, Kiyomoto M (2008) Turn to the left or to the west: verbal navigational directions in relative and absolute frames of reference. In: Geographic information science, vol 5266. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–132
Willis KS, Hölscher C, Wilbertz G, Li C (2009) A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:100–110
Schmid F (2008) Knowledge-based wayfinding maps for small display cartography. J Locat Based Serv 2:57–83
Waters W, Winter S (2011) A wayfinding aid to increase navigator independence. J Spat Inform Sci 2011:103–122
Munzer S, Zimmer HD, Baus J (2012) Navigation assistance: a trade-off between wayfinding support and configural learning support. J Exp Psychol 18:18–37
Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Adv Child Dev Behav 10:9–55
Parush A, Berman D (2004) Orientation and navigation in 3D user interfaces: the impact of navigation aids and landmarks. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61:375–395
Von Stülpnagel R, Steffens MC (2012) Can active navigation be as good as driving? A comparison of spatial memory in drivers and backseat drivers. J Exp Psychol 18:162
Farrell MJ, Arnold P, Pettifer S, Adams J, Graham T, MacManamon M (2003) Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. J Exp Psychol 9:219
Jarus T (1995) Is more always better? Optimal amounts of feedback in learning to calibrate sensory awareness. Occup Ther J Res 15:181–197
Baudisch P, Rosenholtz R (2003) Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In: CHI 2003 conference for human–computer interaction 2003, pp 481–488
Gustafson S, Baudisch P, Gutwin C, Irani P (2008) Wedge: clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations. In: CHI 2008 conference for human–computer interaction, pp 787–796
Li R, Korda A, Radtke M, Schwering A (2014) Visualising distant off-screen landmarks on mobile devices to support spatial orientation. J Locat Based Serv 8:166–178
Zellweger PT, Mackinlay JD, Good L, Stefik M, Baudisch P (2003) City lights: contextual views in minimal space. In: CHI 2003 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, pp 838–839
Irani P, Gutwin C, Yang XD (2006) Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping. In: CHI 2006 conference for human–computer interaction. ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, pp 299–308.
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992) Descriptions and depictions of environments. Mem Cognit 20:483–496
Plaisant C, Carr D, Shneiderman B (1995) Image-browser taxonomy and guidelines for designers. IEEE Softw 12:21–32
Burigat S, Chittaro L, Gabrielli S (2006) Visualizing locations of off-screen objects on mobile devices: a comparative evaluation of three approaches. In: Human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services (Mobile HCI 2006). ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, pp 239–246
Gustafson S, Irani P (2007) Comparing visualization for tracking off-screen moving targets. In: CHI 2007. ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, pp 2399–2404
Gollenstede A, Weisensee M (2014) Animated cartographic visualisation of networks on mobile devices. In: 11th international symposium on location-based services, pp. 26–28
Li R, Fuest S, Schwering A (2013) The effects of different verbal route instructions on spatial orientation. In: the 17th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Castellon, Spain
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, R., Zhao, J. Off-Screen Landmarks on Mobile Devices: Levels of Measurement and the Perception of Distance on Resized Icons. Künstl Intell 31, 141–149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-016-0471-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-016-0471-7