Abstract
The Homicidal Chauffeur differential game is often mentioned in the literature, but the game’s complete solution is not readily available. In this work, the complete solution process of the Homicidal Chauffeur differential game is illustrated for the parameter range in the heart of the speed ratio-capture radius parameter space initially investigated by Isaacs, and referred to by Breakwell and Merz as the classical Homicidal Chauffeur differential game. Some salient features of the solution of this foundational differential game are highlighted, and some popular misconceptions are dispelled. This tutorial paper fills a gap in the literature on pursuit-evasion differential games.





















Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barron EN, Jensen R (1986) The Pontryagin maximum principle from dynamic programming and viscosity solutions to first-order partial differential equations. Trans Am Math Soc 298:635–641
Bernhard P (1992) Differential games: lecture notes on the Isaacs–Breakwell theory. Summer School on Differential Games, Cagliari
Boltyanskii VG (1971) Mathematical methods of optimal control. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York
Coates S, Pachter M, Murphey R (2017) Analysis of Example 10.6.1 in Isaacs’ Book. Unpublished
Coates S, Pachter M, Murphey R (2017) Optimal control of a Dubins car with a capture set and the homicidal chauffeur differential game. Presented at the 57th Israel annual conference on aerospace sciences, Tel Aviv & Haifa and in the proceedings of the 20th World Congress of IFAC, Toulouse, France, pp 5247–5252
Dubins LE (1957) On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math 79(3):497–516
Isaacs R (1965) Differential games: a mathematical theory with applications to warfare and pursuit, control and optimization. Wiley, New York, pp 297–304
Kumkov SS, Le Menec S, Patsko VS (2017) Zero-sum pursuit-evasion differential games with many objects: survey of publications. Dyn Games Appl 7(4):609–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-016-0209-z
Lewin J (1994) Differential games: theory and methods for solving game problem with singular surfaces. Springer, London, pp 188–194
Merz AW (1971) The Homicidal Chauffeur—a differential game. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University
Merz AW (1974) The Homicidal Chauffeur. AIAA J 12(3):259–260
Patsko VS, Turova VL (2009) Homicidal Chauffeur games: history and modern studies. Scientific report. Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ekaterinburg
Pontryagin LS (1987) Mathematical theory of optimal processes. CRC Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.
Appendix: The Evader’s Tributary Option
Appendix: The Evader’s Tributary Option
If the Evader contacts point B, if he chooses, he can enter the region of the tributary trajectories. This is shown by repeating the methodology used in Sect. 4.2. The normal at B, pointing into the region of the tributary trajectories, is
Since the Evader is entering the region of the tributary trajectories from point B, the forward time dynamics are examined. Recalling the forward time dynamics from Eq. (4), the vector
When the Evader is located at B, the Pursuer applies the control \( u^*=-1 \). To enter the region of the tributary trajectories from B, the Evader applies his tributary trajectory control given by Eq. (24). At B, when these controls are applied, the dynamics are
where \( (x_B, y_B) \) is the Evader’s position at the end point B of the barrier—see Eqs. (21) and (22). For the Pursuer to push the Evader off of B, into the region of the tributary trajectories, the following must hold true
Evaluating the above inequality yields
\( \Rightarrow \)
From Sect. 3.4, it is known that there is a critical tributary trajectory that contacts B at the retrograde time \( \tau _1\)—see Eq. (33).
A numerical evaluation of the equation above reveals that, at the critical retrograde time specified by Eq. (33), \( \mathbf {n}\cdot \mathbf {f}>0 \), thereby verifying that when the Evader applies his tributary region control at B, he can move from B into the region of the tributary trajectories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pachter, M., Coates, S. The Classical Homicidal Chauffeur Game. Dyn Games Appl 9, 800–850 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-018-0264-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-018-0264-8