Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inferring the mental state of influencers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most analysis of influence examines the mechanisms used, and their effectiveness on the intended audience. Here, we consider influence from another perspective: what does the choice in the language of influencers signal about their internal mental state, strategies and assessments of success? We do this by examining the language used by the US presidential candidates in the high-stakes attempt to get elected. Such candidates try to influence potential voters, but must also pay attention to the parallel attempts by their competitors to influence the same pool. We examine channels: nouns, as surrogates for content; adjectives, verbs, and adverbs as modifiers of discussion of the same pool of ideas from different perspectives, positive and negative language; and persona deception, the use of language to present oneself as better than the reality. Several intuitive and expected hypotheses are supported, but some unexpected and surprising structures also emerge. The results provide insights into related influence scenarios where open-source data are available, e.g., marketing, business reporting, and intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alias-i (2008) Lingpipe 4.1.0. http://alias-i.com/lingpipe

  • Benoit W (2004) Election outcome and topic of political campaign attacks. South Commun J 69:348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit W (2007) Communication in political campaigns. Peter Lang, New York, p 292

  • Chung C, Pennebaker J (2008) Revealing dimensions of thinking in open-ended self-descriptions: an automated meaning extraction method for natural language. J Res Personal 42:96–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung C, Pennebaker J (2007) The psychological function of function words. In: Fiedler K (ed) Frontiers in social psychology. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway III L, Conway K, Gornick L, Houck S (in press) Automated integrative complexity. Political Psychology

  • Conway III L, Gornick L, Burfeind C, Mandella P, Kuenzli A, Houck S, Fullerton D (2012) Does complex or simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of US presidential campaigns. Political Psychol 33(5):599–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway III L, Thoemmes F, Allison A, Towgood K, Wagner M, Davey K, Salcido A, Stovall A, Dodds D, Bongard K, Conway K (2008) Two ways to be complex and why they matter: implications for attitude strength and lying. J Personal Soc Psychol 95(5):1029–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creasor J, Skillicorn D (2012) QTagger extracting word usage from large corpora. Technical report 2012-587, School of Computing, Queen’s University, Kingston

  • Druckman J, Kifer M, Parkin M (2009) Campaign communications in US congressional elections. Am Political Sci Rev 103(3):343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godbole N, Srinivasaiah M, Skiena S (2007) Large-scale sentiment analysis for news and blogs. In: ICWSM, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2007

  • Golub G, van Loan C (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

  • Hacker K, Zakahi W, Giles M, McQuitty S (2000) Components of candidate images: statistical analysis of the issue-persona dichotomy in the presidential campaign of 1996. Commun Monogr 67(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing J, Theiss-Morse E (2002) Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Kanayama H, Nasukawa T, Watanabe H (2004) Deeper sentiment analysis using machine translation technology. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics, 23–27 Aug 2004, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Keila P, Skillicorn D (2005) Structure in the Enron email dataset. Comput Math Organ Theory 11(3):183–199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koppel M, Akiva N, Alshech E, Bar K (2009) Automatically classifying documents by ideological and organizational affiliation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics (ISI 2009), 8–11 June 2009, pp 176–178

  • Loughran T, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. J Finance 66:35–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen C, Halliday M (1997) Systemic functional grammar: a first step into the theory. Macquarie University working paper, Macquarie Park, Australia

  • Nasukawa T, Yi J (2003) Sentiment analysis: capturing favorability using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on knowledge capture, 23–25 Oct 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, pp 70–77

  • Newman M, Pennebaker J, Berry D, Richards J (2003) Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic style. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 29:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson J, Ouyang Y, Poe J, Trantham A, Waterman R (2012) The teleprompter presidency: comparing Obama’s campaign and governing rhetoric. Soc Sci Quart 93(5):1404–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens D (2012) Tone versus information: explaining the impact of negative political advertising. J Political Market 11(4):322–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld P, Tetlock P, Streufert S (1992) Conceptual/integrative complexity. In: Motivation and personality: handbook of thematic content analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 393–400

  • Tausczik Y, Pennebaker J (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol 29:24–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock P (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market. J Finance 62:1139–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumasjan A, Sprenger T, Sandner P, Welpe I (2010) Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the 4th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, 23–26 May 2010, Washington DC, USA, pp 178–185

  • Whitelaw C, Argamon S (2004) Systemic functional features in stylistic text classification. In: Proceedings of AAAI fall symposim on style and meaning in language, art, music, and design, Washington DC, USA

  • Whitelaw C, Garg N, Argamon S (2005) Using appraisal taxonomies for sentiment analysis. In: Second Midwest Computational Linguistic Colloquium (MCLC 2005), 14–15 May 2005, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

    D. B. Skillicorn

  2. School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

    C. Leuprecht

Authors
  1. D. B. Skillicorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Leuprecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. B. Skillicorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skillicorn, D.B., Leuprecht, C. Inferring the mental state of influencers. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3, 565–595 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0102-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0102-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation