Skip to main content
Log in

An emotional polarity analysis of consumers’ airline service tweets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blogs and social networks have recently become a valuable resource for mining sentiments in fields as diverse as customer relationship management, public opinion tracking and text filtering. In fact, the knowledge obtained from social networks such as Twitter and Facebook has been shown to be extremely valuable to marketing research companies, public opinion organizations and other text mining entities. However, Web texts have been classified as noisy as they still pose considerable problems both at the lexical and the syntactic levels. In this research, we used a random sample of 2,105 tweets for sixteen commercial airlines to evaluate consumers’ sentiment towards airline service provided. We used an expert pre-defined lexicon to conduct the analysis. The lexicon includes around 6,800 seed adjectives with known orientation. Our results indicate a generally negative consumer sentiment towards commercial airline services, which suggests that most airline services are sub-optimal. Using both a qualitative and quantitative methodology to analyze airline service tweets, this study adds breadth and depth to the debate over airline service quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi H, Chen H, Salem A (2008) Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums. ACM Trans Inform Syst 26:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerri R, Garcia-Serrano A (2010) Q-WordNet: extracting polarity from WordNet senses. Paper Presented at the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation. Malta (www.irec-conf.org)

  • Ahmed K, Almas Y (2005) Visualising sentiments in financial texts? In: Proceedings of the 9th international Conference on information visualization, pp 363–368

  • Ammann S (2010) A political campaign message in 140 characters or less: the use of Twitter by US Senate candidates in 2010. http://aladinrc.wrlc.org

  • Baccianella S, Esuli A, Sebastiani F (2010) SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 7th conference on International language resources and evaluation (www.irec-conf.org)

  • Bai X (2011) Predicting consumer sentiments from online text. Decis Support Syst 50:732–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin M (1981) The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Goldensohn S, Hannan K, McDonald R, Neylon T, Reis G, Reynar J (2008) Building a sentiment summarizer for local service reviews. Paper presented at the WWW 2008 Workshop on NLP Challenges in the Information Explosion Era (NLPIX 2008), Beijing, April, 22

  • Bliss C, Klouman I, Harris K, Danforth C, Dodds P (2012) Twitter reciprocal networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness. J Comput Sci 3:388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiy E, Moens M (2009) A machine learning approach to sentiment analysis in multilingual Web texts. Inf Retrieval 12:526–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci 2:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai K, Spangler S, Chen Y, Zhang L (2010) Leveraging sentiment analysis fro topic detection. Web Intell Agent Syst 8:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S, Chen S, Chou R, Lin Y (2012) Local sports sentiment and returns of locally headquartered stocks: a firm-level analysis. J Emp Finance 19:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Qi L (2011) Social opinion mining for supporting buyers’ complex decision making: exploratory user study and algorithm comparison. Soc Netw Anal Min 1:301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong M, Lee V (2011) A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via Twitter. Inform Syst Frontiers 13:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark J (2008) Twitter topic stream (www.neoformix.com)

  • Das S, Chen M (2001) Yahoo! for Amazon: sentiment parsing from small talk on the com. European Finance Assoc Meet, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Dave K, Lawrence S, Pennock D (2003) Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th International conference on the World Wide Web (WWW-03), ACM Press, New York, pp 519–528

  • Denecke K, Nejdi W (2009) How valuable is medical social media data? Content analysis of the medical web. Inf Sci 179:1870–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks D, Fischer A, Bos A (2008) The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: a review. Comput Hum Behav 24:766–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding X, Liu B, Yu P (2008) A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the international conference on web search and web data mining. CAN, pp 231–240

  • Efron M (2004) Cultural orientation: classifying subjective documents by co-citation analysis. AAAI Fall Symposium on Style and Meaning in Language, Art, and Music

  • Eirinaki M, Pisal S, Singh J (2012) Feature-based opinion mining and ranking. J Comput Syst Sci 78:1175–1184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ekdale B, Namkoong K, Perlmutter D (2010) Why blog? (then and now): exploring the motivation for blogging by popular American political bloggers. New Media Society 12:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R, Fresko M, Netzer P, Ungar L (2007) Extracting product comparisons from discussion boards. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM’ 2007). Los Alamitos, CA, pp 469–474

  • Gil De Zuniga H, Puig-I-Abril E, Rojas H (2009) Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media Society 11:553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck J, Grimes J, Rogers A (2010) Twitter use by the US Congress. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61:1612–1621

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Konana P, Liu A, Rajagopalan B, Ghosh J (2006) Predictive value of stock message board sentiments. McCombs Research Paper Series No. IROM-11-06

  • Havre S, Hetzler E, Whitney P, Nowell L (2002) ThemeRiver: visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 8:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard J, Stockard J, Tusler M (2003) Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff 22:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt C, Herring S (2009) Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International conference on system sciences (HICSS 09), pp 1–10

  • Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (ACM SIGKDD 2004), pp 168–177

  • Hu N, Bose I, Koh N, Liu L (2012) Manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decis Support Syst 52:674–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Thornton K, Efthimiadis E (2010) Conversational tagging in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, ACM Press, New York, pp 173–178

  • Jansen B, Zhang M, Sobel K, Chowdury A (2009) Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 60:2169–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan K, Goyal M, Jacob G (Forthcoming) Modeling the impact of review dynamics on utility value of a product. Social Network Analysis and Mining

  • Kaplanski G, Levy H (2010) Sentiment and stock prices: the case of disasters. J Financ Econ 95:174–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Hovy E (2004) Determining the sentiment of opinions. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), East Stroudsburg, PA, p 1367

  • Larsson A, Moe H (2011) Studying political microblogging: twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media and Society 14:727–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong C, Lee Y, Mak W (2012) Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Syst Appl 39:2584–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Wu D (2010) Using text mining and sentiment analysis for online forums hotspot detection and forecast. Decis Support Syst 48:354–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim M (2012) Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. J Commun 62:231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren S (2012) “It took me about half an hour, but I did it!” Media circuits and affinity spaces around how-to videos on YouTube. European J Commun 27:152–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing

  • Liu Y, Huang X, An A, Yu X (2007) ARSA: a sentiment-aware model for predicting sales performance using blogs. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, New York, NY, pp 607–614

  • Malouf R, Mullen T (2008) Taking sides: user classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Res 18:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Q, Li Q, Zeng D (2010) Fine-grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61:2288–2299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikes L, Darby R, Hwe V, Bajic D, Warker J, Harris C, Christenfeld N (Forthcoming) Major memory for microblogs. Memory and Cognition

  • Miner G, Delen D, Elder J, Fast A, Hill T, Nisbet B (2012) Practical text mining and statistical analysis for non-structured text data applications. Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Missen M, Boughanem M, Cabanac G (Forthcoming) Opinion mining: reviewed from word to document level. Social Network Analysis and Mining

  • Miyoshi T, Nakagami Y (2007) Sentiment classification of customer reviews on electronic products. In: Proceedings of the international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp 2028–2033

  • Montoyo A, Martiniz-Barco P, Balahur A (Forthcoming) Subjectivity and sentiment analysis: an overview of the current state of the area and envisaged developments. Decision Support Systems

  • Na J, Khoo C, Wu P (2005) Use of negation phrases in automatic sentiment classification of product reviews. Libr Collect Acquis Tech Serv 29:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na J, Thet T, Khoo C (2010) Comparing sentiment expression in movie reviews from four online genres. Online Inform Rev 34:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary D (2011) Blog mining-review and extensions: “from each according to his opinion”. Decis Support Syst 51:821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S (2002) Thups up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on engineering methods in natural language processing. Morristown, NJ, pp 79–86

  • Papacharissi Z, Oliveira M (2012) Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. J Commun 62:266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Kim C, Barnett G (2004) Socio-communicational structure among political actors on the Web. New Media and Society 6:403–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Lim Y, Sams S, Nam S, Park H (2011) Networked politics on cyworld: the text and sentiment of Korean political profiles. Social Sci Comput Rev 29:288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson T (2001) A decision tree of bigrams is an accurate predictor of word sense. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 79–86

  • Pekar V, Ou S (2008) Discovery of subjective evaluations of product features in hotel reviews. J Vacat Mark 14:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker J, Mehl M, Niederhoffer K (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Ann Rev Psychol 54:547–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provalis Research (2011) QDA Miner version 4.0 User Manual. Montreal, QC, Canada

  • Qiu G, He X, Zhang F, Shi Y, Bu J, Chen C (2010) DASA: dissatisfaction-oriented advertising based on sentiment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 37:6182–6191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semiocast.com (2012) Geolocation analysis of Twitter accounts (accessed on August 5, 2012)

  • Shan L, Gong S (2012) Investor sentiment and stock returns: wenchuan earthquake. Finance Res Lett 9:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowicz P, Kaschesky M, Bouchard G (Forthcoming) Opinion mining in social media: modeling, simulation, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Government Information Quarterly

  • Stone P, Dunphy D, Smith M, Ogilvie D (1966) The general inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taboada M, Brooke J, Tofiloski M, Voll K, Stede M (2011) Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 37:267–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G, Cai D, Kappas A (2010) Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61:2544–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G (2011) Sentiment in Twitter events. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 62:406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thet T, Na J, Khoo C (2008a) Sentiment classification of movie reviews using multiple perspectives. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 184–193

  • Thet T, Na J, Khoo C (2008b) Aspects-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards. J Inform Sci 36:823–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas M, Pang B, Lee L (2006) Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

  • Tong R (2001) An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in online discussions. Working Notes of the Workshop on Operational Text Classification, New Orleans, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumasjan A, Sprenger T, Sandner P, Welpe I (2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Soc Sc Comput Rev 29:402–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney P (2002) Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 02), Philadelphia, PA, pp 417–424

  • Turney P, Littman M (2003) Measuring praise and criticism: inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans Inform Syst 21:315–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath J, Aishwarya S (2011) User suggestions extraction from customer reviews. Intern J Comput Sci Eng 3:1203–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe J, Wilson TT, Bruce R, Bell M, Martin M (2004) Learning subjective language. Comput Linguist 30:277–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijaya P, Bressan S (2008) A random walk on the red carpet: rating movies with user reviews and Page Rank. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM Press, New York, pp 951–960

  • Williams C, Gulati G (2008) What is a social network worth? Facebook and vote share in the 2008 presidential primaries. The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. APSA, Boston, pp 1–17

  • Wong K, Xia Y, Xu R, Wu M, Li W (2008) Pattern-based opinion mining for stock market trend prediction. Intern J Comput process Lang 21:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Liao S, Li Q (2008) Combining empirical experimentation and modeling techniques: a design research approach for personalized mobile advertising applications. Decis Support Syst 44:710–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi J, Nasukawa T, Bunescu R, Niblack W (2003) Sentiment analyzer: extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language-processing techniques. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’ 2003). Los Alamitos, CA, pp 427–434

  • Zagal J, Tomuro N, Shepitsen A (2012) Natural language processing in game studies research: an overview. Simulation and Gaming 43:356–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna M (2011) Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media and Society 13:788–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zeng D, Li J, Wang F, Zuo W (2009) Sentiment analysis of Chinese documents: from sentence to document level. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 60:2474–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Xu H, Wan W (2012) Weakness finder: find product weakness from Chinese reviews by using aspects based sentiment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 39:10283–10291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang L, Jing F, Zhu X (2006) Movie review mining and summarization. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY, pp 43–50

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed M. Mostafa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostafa, M.M. An emotional polarity analysis of consumers’ airline service tweets. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3, 635–649 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0111-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0111-2

Keywords