Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact analysis of facebook in family bonding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, Facebook is a very popular social communication media. People utilize Facebook to express their thoughts, ideas, poems, and sorrows on Facebook. In the age of information superhighway, majority of the teenagers are not sharing their difficulties, problems, inconsistency, inability and failure with their parents in Bangladesh. However, they share with their friends on Facebook. Subsequently, their friends are making comments, providing shelters and affections to them. Due to lack of education and experiences on technology, guardians in Bangladesh are not aware about the communications and addictions on social Medias. Therefore, there are generating gaps between the guardians and their children. In this paper, a survey-based and Apriori algorithm analyzes the behaviors of teenagers’ by collecting information from their Facebook pages. Parents and teachers opinions are also considered about the activities of students on home and institutes. Here, age limits of targeted teen agers are between 16 and 18. From this analysis, vulnerable relationship between parents and their teenage children have been noticed. The pivotal problem was that teens are spending more time on Facebook and parents want them to the table during study time and school time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquisti A and Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, ACM Digital Library, pp. 36–58

  • Agrawal R, Imielinsk T, Swami S (1993) Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD Conference, pp. 207–216

  • Ahmed AD, Rabeb M, Hadi O (2015) Analysis of collaborative learning in social network sites used in education. Social Netw Anal Min 5:1, paper 65

  • Alberto OZ, Luana H, Hitomi K, Julio A, Sandra B (2014) Never forget, whom was my ancestors: a cross-cultural analysis from Yonsei (fourth-generation Nikkei) in four societies using Data Mining, The Computing Research Repository (CoRR). http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6598

  • Alberto OZ, Oscar C, Patricia M, Nemesio C, Sandra B, Julio A (2014b) Shipwrecked on fear: selection of electives in school minorities in a University using Cuckoo Search Algorithm. Recent Adv Hybrid Approaches Des Intell Sys 547:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexis RL, Ellen W, Victoria JR (2015) Young children’s screen time: the complex role of parent and child factors. J Appl Dev Psychol 36:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis N (2012) A social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481:497–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337:337–341

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett WL, Segerberg A (2012) The logic of connective action digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Inf Commun Soc 15(5):739–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best S, Dautrich K (2009) Reinvigorating democracy: generating social capital and political participation on the interne, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p116209_index.html

  • Bond RM, Fowler JH, Christopher JF, Jason JJ, Adam DIK, Cameron M, Jaime ES (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne S (2011) Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: using panel data to examine the use of news media and political interest. Polit Commun 28(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne S (2015) Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf Commun Soc 18(5):524–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne M, Brailey S (2014) Attachment to community and civic and political engagement: a case study of students. Can Rev Sociol 51(4):375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Med Commun 13:210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2012), Networks of outrage and hope, social movements in the internet age, polity, 2nd edn. Cambridge, pp. 12–32. http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0745695752.html

  • Chen L and Wei L (2010) The hot research topics and the research fronts in the field of Web Data Mining (WDM) based on web of science. The 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Education Hefei, pp. 24–27

  • Donath J, Boyd DM (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technol J 22(4):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison NB, Steinfield Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students use of online social network sites. J Comput Med Commun 12(4):1143–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris D (2013) Dissent and revolution in a digital age: social media, blogging, and activism in Egypt. IB Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler J, Floyd J (1993) Survey research methods, 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Sage Publications, London

  • Golder SA, Macy MW (2014) Digital footprints: opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Rev. Social 40(1):129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkidi M (2000) Quality assessment and uncertainty handling in data mining process. In: Proc, EDBT Conference, Konstanz, Germany

  • Hodgkinson T (2008), With friends like these…, The Guardian. Retrieved

  • Isaac S, Michael WB (1997) Handbook in research and evaluation: a collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Educational and Industrial Testing Services, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse S, Benjamin L (2015) Spectral goodness of fit for network models. Social Netw 43:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco R (2015) Student class standing Facebook use, and academic performance. J Appl Dev Psychol 36:18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur G, Aggarwal N (2010) Association rule mining in XML databases: performance evaluation and analysis. Int J Comput Sci Technol 1(2):33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh A, Reese D, Carroll J, Rosson M (2009) Weak ties in networked communities. Inf Soci 21(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Ikeda K, Miyata K (2008) Social capital online: collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Inf Commun Soc 9(5):582–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer KL ed (1991) The information systems research challenge: survey research methods, vol. 3. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

  • Kraut RE, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukopadhyay T, Scherlis W (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol 53(9):1017–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut RE, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A (2002) Internet paradox revisited. J Social Issues 58(1):49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy PS, Lemeshow S (1999) Sampling of populations: Methods and applications, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 6

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Liu J (2013) Performance analysis of map reduce program in heterogeneous cloud computing. J Netw 8(8):1734–1741

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusher D, Robinsc G (2013) Personal attitudes, perceived attitudes, and social struc-tures: a social selection model. In: Dean L, Johan K, Garry R (eds) Exponential random graph models for social networks: theory methods and applications., Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew EB, Eric G (2016) Error correction mechanisms in social networks can reduce accuracy and encourage innovation. Social Netw 44:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie NH (2001) Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: reconciling conflicting findings. Am Behav Sci 45:420–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyland R, Marvez, Beck J (2007) MySpace: Social networking or social isolation? Paper presented at the midwinter conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Reno

  • Onnela JP, Reed TF (2010) Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:18375–18380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul RB, Michael H, Ruby H, Lindsay HH, Philip EJ, Jennifer LL (2015) Interactivity between candidates and citizens on a social networking site: effects on perceptions and vote intentions. J Exp Political Sci. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Gupta R (2012) Implementing improved algorithm over APRIORI data mining association rule algorithm. Int J Comput Sci Technol 3(1):489–493

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rasanen P, Kouvo A (2007) Linked or divided by the web?: internet use and sociability in four European countries. Inf Commun Soc 10(2):219–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui Z, Quan ZS, Lina Y (2015) A simulation method for social networks. Social Netw Anal Mining 5(6). doi:10.1007/s13278-015-0246-4

  • Salant P, Dillman DA (1994) How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 3,100

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant TP, Dillman A (1995) How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra GB, Ning W (2016) Networked discontent: the anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Netw 44:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarah B, Ivan J, Stephane F (2015) An empirical study of notifications’ importance for online social network users. Social Netw Anal Mining 5:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A (2015) How social media played imperative role in Narendra Modi’s historic political win. http://www.digiperform.com/social-media-played-imperative-role-narendra-modis-historic-political-win/

  • Stern MJ, Dillman DA (2006) Community participation, social ties, and use of the internet. City Commun 5(4):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young KJ (2008) The impact of internet use patterns on political engagement: a focus on online deliberation and virtual social capital. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age 11(1):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawaidah FHA, Jbara YH, Marwan AL (2011) An improved algorithm for mining association rules in large databases. World Comput Sci Inf Technol J (WCSIT) 1(7):311–316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarwar Kamal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamal, S., Arefin, M.S. Impact analysis of facebook in family bonding. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 6, 9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0314-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0314-9

Keywords

Navigation