Abstract
In recent times, the Indian government has launched campaigns cautioning users against malicious apps which trick users into expending money on the app in the false hopes of quick passive income. They are also tricked into sharing their personally identifiable information in many cases. It is observed that such apps are heavily promoted on video sharing sites such as YouTube which results into exploitative monetization of user’s watch time and degrades user experience. In this work, we perform an investigative study to analyze and identify such videos termed as Monetary Scam videos. A detailed analysis of the characteristics of monetary scam videos has been performed based on contextual and statistical features. The context of a video targeted for Indian audience contains non-standard transliteration of Hindi words written in Roman script which makes existing video context-based models unsuitable for identification of such monetary scam videos. Thus, it is required to build a solution specific to the Indian context. A total of 1500 videos were collected and labeled for this work. Two types of features: 1) textual attributes and 2) Metadata-based statistical features have been used for three-class and two-class classification of the collected videos using five machine learning classifiers. In the experimental results, the Random Forest classifier predicts scam videos with the best accuracy scores among all the five classifiers in both three-class and two-class classifiers. A comparative analysis with three state-of-the-art models from similar studies depict that our model outperforms others for our collected dataset in both three-class and two-class classifications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Public data has been collected from YouTube videos through YouTube Data API. It is not available for sharing without the permission of YouTube. Only the video IDs and ground-truth labels can be asked for sharing by mailing the authors.
Notes
References
Abu-Nimeh S, Chen T, Alzubi O (2011) Malicious and spam posts in online social networks. Computer 44(9):23–28
Ahmed F, Abulaish M (2013) A generic statistical approach for spam detection in online social networks. Comput Commun 36(10–11):1120–1129
Alberto TC, Lochter JV, Almeida TA (2015) Tubespam: Comment spam filtering on youtube. In 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (IEEE: 138–143
Alharthi R, Alhothali A, Moria K (2021) A real-time deep-learning approach for filtering arabic low-quality content and accounts on twitter. Information Systems 99: 101-740
Angeles CN, Ramos CDL (2021) Investigating Unrelated# COVID19 Twitter Expressions: Implications of Spam Content on Information Credibility. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (Springer): 293–309
Benevenuto F, Rodrigues T, Almeida V, Almeida J, Zhang C, Ross K (2008) in Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web: 45–52
Chaudhary V, Sureka A (2013). Contextual feature based one-class classifier approach for detecting video response spam on youtube. In 2013 Eleventh Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (IEEE): 195–204
Chen C, Zhang J, Chen X, Xiang Y, Zhou W (2015) in 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (IEEE), pp. 7065–7070
Choi H, Zhu BB, Lee H (2011) Detecting malicious web links and identifying their attack types. WebApps 11(11):218
Davoudi M, Moosavi M, Sadreddini M (2022) DSS: A hybrid deep model for fake news detection using propagation tree and stance network. Expert Syst With Appl 198:116635
Deiana G (2015) Analysis and detection of clickjacking on facebook
de Keulenaar E, Burton AG, Kisjes I (2021) Deplatforming, demotion and folk theories of big tech persecution. Fronteiras-estudos midiáticos 23(2):118–139
Gogoglou A, Theodosiou Z, Kounoudes T, Vakali A, Manolopoulos Y (2016) Early malicious activity discovery in microblogs by social bridges detection. 2016 IEEE International Symposium On Signal Processing And Information Technology (ISSPIT): 132-137
Gunnerson S (2017) “get out of my face (book)!” using facebook to examine verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness. Ph.D. thesis, University of Akron
Gupta N, Aggarwal A, Kumaraguru P (2014) in 2014 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime) (IEEE): 14–24
YouTube Help. YouTube partner earnings overview https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/72902?hl=en (2020). Accessed 2020-06-24
YouTube Help. Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801973?hl=en (2020). Accessed 2020-06-24
In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22) (USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 2022). https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/chu
Kuchhal D, Li F (2022) A view into YouTube view fraud. Proc ACM Web Confe 2022:555–563
Lee S, Kim J (2013) Warningbird: A near real-time detection system for suspicious urls in twitter stream. IEEE transactions on dependable and secure computing 10(3):183–195
Li Z, Alrwais S, Xie Y, Yu F, Wang X (2013) in 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE): 112–126
Mariconti E, Onaolapo J, Ahmad S, Nikiforou N, Egele M, Nikiforakis N, Stringhini G (2016) Why allowing profile name reuse is a bad idea. Proceedings Of The 9th European Workshop On System Security 1-6
Mccord M, Chuah M (2011) Spam detection on twitter using traditional classifiers. In international conference on Autonomic and trusted computing (Springer): 175–186
Miller Z, Dickinson B, Deitrick W, Hu W, Wang AH (2014) Twitter spammer detection using data stream clustering. Inform Sci 260:64–73
Mishra S, Soni D (2022) Implementation of ‘Smishing Detector’: An efficient model for smishing detection using neural network. SN Comput Sci 3:1–13
Nepali RK, Wang Y (2016) You look suspicious!!: Leveraging visible attributes to classify malicious short urls on twitter. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (IEEE), pp. 2648–2655
O’Callaghan D, Harrigan M, Carthy J, Cunningham P. (2012) in Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
Papadopoulou O, Zampoglou MS, Papadopoulos Y (2017) Web video verification using contextual cues. Proceedings Of The 2nd International workshop On multimedia Forensics and security: 6-10
Sahoo D, Liu C, Hoi SC (2017) Malicious url detection using machine learning: A survey arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07179 (2017)
Samsudin NM, Mohd Foozy CF, Alias N, Shamala P, Othman NF, Wan Din WIS (2019) Youtube spam detection framework using naïve bayes and logistic regression. Indonesian J Electrical Eng Comput Sci 14(3):1508–1517
Shetty A, Abreo B, D’Souza A, Kondana A, Karimbi K (2021) Video Description Based Youtube Comment Classification. Applications Of Artificial Intelligence In Engineering: 667-678
Singh M, Bansal D, Sofat S (2016) Behavioral analysis and classification of spammers distributing pornographic content in social media. Soc Netw Anal Mining 6(1):41
Sohrabi MK, Karimi F (2018) A feature selection approach to detect spam in the facebook social network. Arabian J Sci Eng 43(2):949–958
Sureka A, Kumaraguru P, Goyal A, Chhabra S (2010) Mining youtube to discover extremist videos, users and hidden communities. Asia Information Retrieval Symposium: 13-24
Thomas K, Grier C, Song D, Paxson V (2011) Suspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of twitter spam. Proceedings Of The 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference On Internet Measurement Conference: 243-258
Varshney D, Vishwakarma D (2021) A unified approach for detection of Clickbait videos on YouTube using cognitive evidences. Appl Intell 51:4214–4235
Yardi S, Romero D, Schoenebeck G, et al. (2010) Detecting spam in a twitter network. First monday
Yusof Y, Sadoon OH (2017) Detecting video spammers in youtube social media. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computing and Informatics: 228–234
Yu S, Vorobeychik Y (2019) Distributionally robust removal of malicious nodes from networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11463
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Competing Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tripathi, A., Ghosh, M. & Bharti, K. Analyzing the uncharted territory of monetizing scam Videos on YouTube. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 12, 119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00945-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00945-1