Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative prognostic nomogram for adult grade II/III astrocytoma in the Chinese Han population

  • Research
  • Published:
Health Information Science and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prognostic models of glioma have been the focus of many studies. However, most of them are based on Western populations. Additionally, because of the complexity of healthcare data in China, it is important to select a suitable model based on existing clinical data. This study aimed to develop and independently validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) with newly diagnosed grade II/III astrocytoma after surgery.

Methods

Data of 472 patients with astrocytoma (grades II–III) were collected from Qilu Hospital as training cohort while data of 250 participants from Linyi People's Hospital were collected as validation cohort. Cox proportional hazards model was used to construct the nomogram and individually predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities. Calibration ability, and discrimination ability were analyzed in both training and validation cohort.

Results

Overall survival was negatively associated with histopathology, age, subtotal resection, multiple tumors, lower KPS and midline tumors. Internal validation and external validation showed good discrimination (The C-index for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.791, 0.748, 0.733 in internal validation and 0.754, 0.735, 0.730 in external validation, respectively). The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and actual 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates.

Conclusion

This is the first nomogram study that integrates common clinicopathological factors to provide an individual probabilistic prognosis prediction for Chinese Han patients with astrocytoma (grades II–III). This model can serve as an easy-to-use tool to advise patients and establish optimized surveillance approaches after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OS:

Overall survival

GBM:

Glioblastoma

WHO:

World Health Organization

IDH:

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

KPS:

Karnofsky performance status

LGGs:

Low-grade gliomas

SD:

Standard deviations

IQRs:

Interquartile ranges

AIC:

Akaike information criterion

C-index:

Concordance index

CI:

Confidence interval

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:1–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ichimura K, Narita Y, Hawkins CE. Diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:789–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1439-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Picca A, Berzero G, Sanson M. Current therapeutic approaches to diffuse grade II and III gliomas. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285617752039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lapointe S, Perry A, Butowski NA. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet. 2018;392:432–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30990-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Brat DJ, Verhaak RGW, Aldape KD, Yung WKA, Salama SR, Cooper LAD, Rheinbay E, Miller CR, Vitucci M, et al. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2481–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers TW, Tsui A, Gonzales M. Re-classification of gliomas by the 2016 revision of the who classification of CNS tumours. Pathology. 2018;50:S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2017.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Overmaat T, Heitner JA, Mischel FR, Heitner M. Consumer-facing genetic testing in China: a status report. Lancet. 2018;392:S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32679-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data. Genome.gov https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/DNA-Sequencing-Costs-Data Accessed December 18, 2019

  10. Zhao X, Wang P, Tao X, Zhong N. Genetic services and testing in China. J Commun Genet. 2013;4:379–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0144-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott JG, Bauchet L, Fraum TJ, Nayak L, Cooper AR, Chao ST, Suh JH, Vogelbaum MA, Peereboom DM, Zouaoui S, et al. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or older. Cancer. 2012;118:5595–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorlia T, Wu W, Wang M, Baumert BG, Mehta M, Buckner JC, Shaw E, Brown P, Stupp R, Galanis E, et al. New validated prognostic models and prognostic calculators in patients with low-grade gliomas diagnosed by central pathology review: a pooled analysis of EORTC/RTOG/NCCTG phase III clinical trials. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:1568–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park C-K, Lee S-H, Han JH, Kim C-Y, Kim D-W, Paek SH, Kim DG, Heo DS, Kim IH, Jung H-W. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in WHO grade III glioma patients treated with radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L, Shen M, Dello Iacono D, McNabb A, Olsen Bailey N, Kreisl TN, Iwamoto FM, Sul J, et al. Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. JCO. 2010;28:3838–43. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van den Bent MJ, Smits M, Kros JM, Chang SM. Diffuse infiltrating oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma. JCO. 2017;35:2394–401. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buckner J, Giannini C, Eckel-Passow J, Lachance D, Parney I, Laack N, Jenkins R. Management of diffuse low-grade gliomas in adults—use of molecular diagnostics. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13:340–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudà R, Bello L, Duffau H, Soffietti R. Seizures in low-grade gliomas: natural history, pathogenesis, and outcome after treatments. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14:iv55–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pallud J, Audureau E, Blonski M, Sanai N, Bauchet L, Fontaine D, Mandonnet E, Dezamis E, Psimaras D, Guyotat J, et al. Epileptic seizures in diffuse low-grade gliomas in adults. Brain. 2014;137:449–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasmussen BK, Hansen S, Laursen RJ, Kosteljanetz M, Schultz H, Nørgård BM, Guldberg R, Gradel KO. Epidemiology of glioma: clinical characteristics, symptoms, and predictors of glioma patients grade I–IV in the the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. J Neurooncol. 2017;135:571–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2607-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holick CN, Giovannucci EL, Rosner B, Stampfer MJ, Michaud DS. Prospective study of cigarette smoking and adult glioma: dosage, duration, and latency. Neuro Oncol. 2007;9:326–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qi Z-Y, Shao C, Yang C, Wang Z, Hui G-Z. Alcohol consumption and risk of glioma: a meta-analysis of 19 observational studies. Nutrients. 2014;6:504–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6020504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gittleman H, Lim D, Kattan MW, Chakravarti A, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Lo SS, Machtay M, Sloan AE, Sulman EP, et al. An independently validated nomogram for individualized estimation of survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825. Neuro Oncol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diffuse astrocytoma, NOS. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/cnstumordiffuseastrocytomaNOS.html Accessed October 5, 2021

  24. Astrocytic tumors | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/astrocytic-tumours Accessed October 5, 2021

  25. Hayakawa K, Konishi Y, Matsuda T, Kuriyama M, Konishi K, Yamashita K, Okumura R, Hamanaka D. Development and aging of brain midline structures: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172:171–7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zamponi N, Rychlicki F, Ducati A, Regnicolo L, Salvolini U, Ricciuti RA. Multicentric glioma with unusual clinical presentation. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2001;17:101–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer; 1998. p. 215–22.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4%3c361::AID-SIM168%3e3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Wei LJ. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Royston P, Altman DG. External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu S, Liu X, Xiao Y, Chen S, Zhuang W. Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang F, Yang P, Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhang W, Hu H, Wang Z, Qiu X, Jiang T. Stratification according to recursive partitioning analysis predicts outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastomas. Oncotarget. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xia Y, Liao W, Huang S, Liu Z, Huang X, Yang C, Ye C, Jiang Y, Wang J. Nomograms for predicting the overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with high-grade glioma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Turk Neurosurg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.26131-19.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma X, Lv Y, Liu J, Wang D, Huang Q, Wang X, Li G, Xu S, Li X. Survival analysis of 205 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis in China. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:1595–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.02.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pignatti F, van den Bent M, Curran D, Debruyne C, Sylvester R, Therasse P, Áfra D, Cornu P, Bolla M, Vecht C, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. JCO. 2002;20:2076–84. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.08.121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tortosa A, Viñolas N, Villà S, Verger E, Gil JM, Brell M, Caral L, Pujol T, Acebes JJ, Ribalta T, et al. Prognostic implication of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features in patients with anaplastic gliomas: Prognostic Factors in Anaplastic Gliomas. Cancer. 2003;97:1063–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gittleman H, Sloan AE, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. An independently validated survival nomogram for lower-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky performance status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao Y-Y, Chen S-H, Hao Z, Zhu H-X, Xing Z-L, Li M-H. A nomogram for predicting individual prognosis of patients with low-grade glioma. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e605–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS, Sjåvik K, Unsgård G, Torp SH, Aaberg K, Berg T, Dai HY, Johnsen K, et al. Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1942–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, Walsh KM, Decker PA, Sicotte H, Pekmezci M, Rice T, Kosel ML, Smirnov IV, et al. Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2499–508. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1407279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Iorgulescu JB, Torre M, Harary M, Smith TR, Aizer AA, Reardon DA, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Perry A. The misclassification of diffuse gliomas: rates and outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2656–63. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81773547 to Fuzhong Xue), the Major Special Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province (Grant No. 21320004011801 to Fuzhong Xue), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M662373 to Fan Yang), Shandong Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease Proteomics Open Research Program (Grant No. 2020XXGJB002 to Fan Yang), Shandong Key Laboratory of Brain Function Remodeling Open Research Program (Grant No. 2020NGN003 to Fan Yang), and Shandong Province major science and technology innovation project (Grant No. 2018CXGC1210 to Fuzhong Xue).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LW, JW, GL, FY and FX contributed to the study conception and design. LW, JW, JZ, HX, LD, FC, XH, ZL, and LY performed the material preparation and data collection. LW, JW, JZ, HX, and LD performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. JZ, HX, XZ contributed to the interpretation. QT, YX, YZ, XJ, GL, FY, and FX revised the article critically for important intellectual content. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fan Yang or Fuzhong Xue.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors made no disclosures. Author Yeping Xu was employed by the company Synthesis Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Jinan, China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The protocol of this study was approved by the Public Health Ethics Committee of Shandong University (Approval No. LL20200701). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study. The analysis used anonymous clinical data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3890 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, J. et al. Postoperative prognostic nomogram for adult grade II/III astrocytoma in the Chinese Han population. Health Inf Sci Syst 11, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-023-00223-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-023-00223-0

Keywords

Navigation