Skip to main content
Log in

Study of collision probability considering a non-uniform cloud of space debris

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper aims to study the cumulative collision probability of a target that crosses a cloud of particles that has the orbital parameters of each individual element modified by a close approach with the Earth. Clouds of this type are formed when natural or man-made bodies explode for some reason. After an explosion like that, the individual particles have different trajectories. The clouds are specified by a non-uniform distribution of semi-major axis and eccentricity of their particles which are assumed to pass close to the Earth, making a close approach that modifies the trajectory of every single particle that belongs to the cloud. This study makes simulations considering separately two different clouds based on the patched conics model to obtain the new trajectories of each particle and to analyze the density of the whole cloud. Then it is possible to map the new distribution of the orbital elements of the fragments that constituted the cloud, using the distribution as initial conditions. After calculating the spatial density for the whole cloud, it is possible to obtain the cumulative collision probability for one space vehicle that crosses the cloud. These pieces of information are important when planning satellite missions where a spacecraft passes close to a cloud of this type, because we can determine values to study the risks of collision and the possible maneuvers that need to be made to avoid them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (2002) Space debris mitigation guidelines. Technical report IADC-issue 1, rev 1, Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC), 2002

  • Kessler DJ, Cour-Palais BG (1978) Collision frequency of artificial satellites: the creation of a debris belt. J Geophys Res 83(A6):2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA06p02637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öpik EJ, Lindsay EM (1951) Collision probabilities with the planets and the distribution of interplanetary matter. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and physical scinces, Vol 54, Section A, no 12. pp 165–199

  • Su S-Y, Kessler D (1985) Contribution of explosion and future collision fragments to the orbital debris environment. Adv Space Res 5(2):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler DJ (1990) Collision probability at low altitudes resulting from elliptical orbits. Adv Space Res 10:393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(90)90376-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letizia F, Colombo C, Lewis HG (2015) Small debris fragments contribution to collision probability for spacecraft in low earth orbits. In: Space Safety is No Accident, Springer, pp. 379–387

  • Letizia F (2018) Extension of the density approach for debris cloud propagation. J Guid Control Dyn 41(12):2650–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letizia F, Colombo C, Lewis HG, McInnes CR (2013) Space debris cloud evolution in low earth orbit. In: 64th International Astronautical Congress, China. 23–27 Sep 2013, IAC-13. A6. p 12

  • Rossi A, Valsecchi G, Alessi E (2015) The criticality of spacecraft index. Adv Space Res 56(3):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letizia F, Colombo C, Lewis H, Krag H (2017) Extending the ECOB space debris index with fragmentation risk estimation. In: 7th European Conference on Space Debris, 17–21 April 2017. European Space Agency (ESA), Darmstadt, Germany

  • Colombo C, Letizia F, Trisolini M, Lewis HG, Chanoine A, Duvernois P, Austin J, Lemmens S (2017a) Life cycle assessment indicator for space debris. In: 7th European Conference on Space Debris. ESA Space Debris Office, v 7, issue 1. Darmstadt

  • Rossi A, Cordelli A, Pardini C, Anselmo L, Farinella P (1995) Modelling the space debris evolution: two new computer codes. Adv Astronaut Sci 89:1217–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Gor’kavyi NN, Ozernoy LM, Mather JC, Observatory T, Ukraine GeorgeMason U, Gsfcnasa, (1997) Quasi-stationary states of dust flows under poynting-robertson drag: new analytical and numerical Solutions. Astrophys J 488(1):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes C R (2000) 4527 simple analytic model of the long-term evolution of nanosatellite constellations. J Guid Control Dyn 23(2):332–338. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis HG, Swinerd G, Williams N, Gittins G (2001) Damage: a dedicated geo debris model framework. Eur Space Agency Publ ESA SP 473:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo and McInnes (2012) Orbital dynamics of earth-orbiting ’smart dust’ spacecraft under the effects of solar radiation pressure and aerodynamic drag, In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2–5 August 2010. AIAA 2010-7656, Toronto, Ontario, Cananda. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-7656

  • Pardini C, Anselmo L (2014) Review of past on-orbit collisions among cataloged objects and examination of the catastrophic fragmentation concept. Acta Astronautica 100:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White AE, Lewis HG (2014) The many futures of active debris removal. Acta Astronautica 95:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.11.009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576513004013. Accessed 25 Oct 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opiela JN, Hillary E, Whitlock DO, Hennigan M, ESCG (2012) Debris Assessment Software–User’s Guide, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Tech Rep, 2012

  • Klinkrad H (2006) Space debris—models and risk analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37674-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler DJ, Johnson NL, Liou J-C, Matney M (2010) The Kessler syndrome: implications to future space operations. In: 33rd Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference, AAS 10-016, Advances in the Astronomical Sciences, vol 137. pp 47–62

  • Liou J, Matney M, Anz-Meador P, Kessler D, Jansen M, Theall J (2001) The new NASA orbital debris engineering model ORDEM2000. In: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-473. pp 309–313

  • Longman RW, Schneider AM (1970) Use of Jupiter’s moons for gravity assist. J Spacecr Rockets 7(5):570–576. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.29992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longuski JM, Williams SN (1991) The last grand tour opportunity to Pluto. J Astronaut Sci 39:359–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Kresák L (1954) On a criterion concerning the perturbing action of the Earth on meteor streams. Bull Astron Inst Czechoslov 5:45

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amario LA, Byrnes DV, Stanford RH (1982) Interplanetary trajectory optimization with application to galileo. J Guid Control Dyn 5(5):465–471. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado AFBA, Broucke R (1996) Transfer orbits in the Earth–Moon system using a regularized model. J Guid Control Dyn 19(4):929–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formiga JKS, Prado A (2011) Orbital characteristics due to the three-dimensional swing-by in the Jun– Jupiter system. In: Proceeding CIMMACS’11/ISP’11 Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on Computational Intelligence, Man-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, and proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on Information Security and Privacy, Jakarta, Indonesia, December 01–03, 2011. pp 61–69

  • Gomes VM, Prado FBA, Golebiewska J (2013) Dynamics of space particles and spacecrafts passing by the atmosphere of the earth. Sci World J 2013:489645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/489645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formiga JKS, dos Santos DPS (2016) Orbital maneuvers to reach and explore a triple asteroid. Comput Appl Math 35(3):893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-016-0307-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Broucke RA, Prado AFBA (1993) Jupiter swing-by trajectories passing near the earth. Adv Astronaut Sci 82(2):1159–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Formiga JKS, Gomes VM, DE Moraes RV (2017) Orbital effects in a cloud of space debris making a close approach with the earth. Comput Appl Math 37:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes VM, Oliveira GMC, Prado AFBA, Sanchez DM (2016) Orbital effects in a cloud of space debris making a close approach with the earth. Comput Appl Math 35:663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-015-0264-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes VM, Formiga JKS, Moraes RV (2008) A study of the impact of the initial energy in a close approach of a cloud of particles. WSEAS Trans Appl Theor Mech 3:869–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes VM, Formiga JKS, Moraes RV (2010) A study of the impact of the initial energy in a close approach of a cloud of particles. WSEAS Trans Math 9:811–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes VM, Formiga JKS, Moraes RV (2013) Studying close approaches for a cloud of particles considering atmospheric drag. Math Prob Eng (Print) 2013:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo RAN, Winter OC, Prado AFBA (2008) Sphere of influence and gravitational capture radius. Mon Noti R Astron Soc (Print) 391:675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formiga JKS, Prado AFBA (2015) Studying sequences of resonant orbits to perform successive close approaches with the moon. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37:1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0254-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos DP, Prado AFBA, Rocco EM (2013) The study of the asymmetric multiple encounters problem and its application to obtain jupiter gravity assisted Maneuvers. Math Probl Eng 2013:745637. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/745637

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Broucke R (1988) The Celestial mechanics of gravity assist. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Aug 15–17, 1988, Technical Papers (A88-50352 21-13). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, pp 69–78

  • Letizia F, Colombo C, Lewis HG (2016) Collision probability due to space debris clouds through a continuum approach. J Guid Control Dyn 39(10):2240–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their appreciation for the support provided by Grants \(\#2016/15675-1\), \(\#2017/04643-4\) from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and Institute of Science and Technology, UNESP - São Paulo State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Kennety Silva Formiga.

Additional information

Communicated by Jose Alberto Cuminato.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Formiga, J.K.S., Santos, D.P.S.d., Fiore, F.A. et al. Study of collision probability considering a non-uniform cloud of space debris. Comp. Appl. Math. 39, 21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0997-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0997-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation