Skip to main content
Log in

Weighted Lindley multiplicative regression frailty models under random censored data

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emphasis of conventional survival research methods has historically been on the occurrence of failures over time. The lack of knowledge of related observed and unobserved covariates during the study of such events can have negative consequences. Frailty models are a viable option for investigating the impact of unobserved covariates in this context. In this article, we suppose that frailty multiplies the hazard rate. As a useful method to ensure the effect of unobserved heterogeneity, we propose weighted Lindley (WL) frailty models with generalized Weibull (GW) and generalized log-logistic-II (GLL2) as the baseline distributions. The Bayesian paradigm of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology is used to estimate the model parameters. Subsequently, model comparisons are performed via Bayesian comparison techniques. The popular kidney data set is considered to illustrate the results. It is shown that the new models perform better than those based on gamma and inverse Gaussian frailty distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon RW (1993) A note on the use of the log-logistic functional form for modeling saturation effects. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 55:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabria R, Pulcini G (1996) Point estimation under asymmetric loss functions for left-truncated exponential samples. Commun Stat Theory Methods 25(3):585–600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chacko M, Mohan R (2018) Bayesian analysis of Weibull distribution based on progressive type-II censored competing risks data with binomial removals. Comput Stat 34(4):233–252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MH, Shao QM (1999) Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible intervals and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat 8(1):69–92

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton’s DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its applications to epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrica 65:141–151

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande JV, Purohit SG (2005) Life time data: statistical models and methods. World Scientific, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD (2008) Frailty regression models in mixture distributions. J Stat Plan Inference 138(8):2462–2468

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD (2019) Modeling survival data using frailty models, 2nd edn. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Dabade AD (2013) Modeling of inverse Gaussian frailty model for bivariate survival data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 42(20):3744–3769

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Dabade AD (2015) Comparison of shared frailty models for kidney infection data under exponential power baseline distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(23):5091–5108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2014) Inverse Gaussian shared frailty for modeling kidney infection data. Adv Reliab 1:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2015) Gamma frailty models for bivariate survival data. J Stat Comput Simul 85(15):3172–3189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Pandey A (2017) Shared inverse Gaussian frailty models based on additive hazards. Commun Stat Theory Methods 46(22):11143–11162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2013) Modeling heterogeneity for bivariate survival data by shared gamma frailty regression model. Model Assist Stat Appl 8:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2015a) Bayesian inference in Marshall-Olkin bi-variate exponential shared gamma frailty regression model under random censoring. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(1):24–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2015b) Comparison of frailty models for acute leukaemia data under Gompertz baseline distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(7):1338–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD, Sharma R (2015c) Analysis of bivariate survival data using shared inverse Gaussian frailty model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(7):1351–1380

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1985) Discussion of the paper by D.G. Clayton and J. Cuzick. J R Stat Soc A 148:113–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1991) Modeling heterogeneity in survival data. J Appl Probab 28:695–701

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim JG, Ming-Hui C, Sinha D (2001) Bayesian survival analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley DV (1958) Fiducial distributions and Bayes’ theorem. J R Stat Soc B 20:102–107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mazucheli J, Coelho-Barros EA, Achcar JA (2016) An alternative reparametrization for the weighted Lindley distribution. Pesqui Oper 36(2):345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist CA, Aisbett CW (1991) Regression with frailty in survival analysis. Biometrics 47:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar SG, Srivastava DK (1993) Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data. IEEE Trans Reliab 42(2):299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar SG, Srivastava DK, Kollia GD (1995) The exponentiated Weibull family: a reanalysis of the bus-motor-failure data. Technometrics 37(4):436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar SG, Srivastava DK, Kollia GD (1996) A generalization of the Weibull distribution with application to the analysis of survival data. J Am Stat Assoc 91(436):1575–1583

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by frailties. J Am Stat Assoc 84(406):487–493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Bhushan S, Pawimawha L, Tyagi S (2020) Analysis of bivariate survival data using shared inverse Gaussian frailty models: a Bayesian approach. Predictive analytics using statistics and big data: concepts and modeling, vol 14. Bentham Books, Sharjah, pp 75–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Santos CA, Achcar JA (2010) A Bayesian analysis for multivariate survival data in the presence of covariates. J Stat Theory Appl 9:233–253

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallaed E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the reviewers for taking the time to read and remark on our manuscript; their suggestions helped us enhance it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Chesneau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential competing interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Eduardo Souza de Cursi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyagi, S., Pandey, A., Agiwal, V. et al. Weighted Lindley multiplicative regression frailty models under random censored data. Comp. Appl. Math. 40, 265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01666-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01666-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation