Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A safe sequential screening technique for solving multi-attribute choice problems under ranked weights

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the increasing complexity of real-world multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) situations, the decision-makers have no problems in providing some incomplete (also called imprecise or partial) information about attribute (importance) weights. Often, incomplete weight information takes the form of weights bounded between upper and lower limits, ranked weights, etc. In this work, we deal with the important class of multi-attribute choice problems (MACPs) in which incomplete weight information consists of a ranking of weights. Prominent solution methods for such MACPs can be classified into dominance measuring methods (DMMs), or ordinal surrogate-weighting schemes. The object of the present article is to circumvent the shortcomings of the most efficacious solution methods that can be used to solve the MACPs under-ranked weights. To that end, we devise here an original safe sequential screening technique named the "TCA-algo'' method. The newly devised method follows three steps: (1) the decision matrix is normalized (if needed) and Pareto dominated alternatives are screened out, (2) a tentative choice alternative (TCA) is nominated from among Pareto optimal alternatives, and (3) the nominated TCA is tested using an appropriate dominance rule established herein. The second and third steps of the suggested method are repeated until a final choice alternative (FCA) is reached. Numerical examples and experimental results show convincingly that the TCA-algo method outperforms prominent solution methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguayo EA, Mateos A, Jimenez A (2014) A new dominance intensity method to deal with ordinal information about a DM’s preference within MAVT. Knowl Based Syst 69:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn BS, Park KS (2008) Comparing methods for multi-attribute decision-making with ordinal weights. Comput Oper Res 35:1660–1670

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barron FH (1992) Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights. Acta Physiol (oxf) 80:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart JT (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen TH (2010) An outcome-oriented approach to multi-criteria decision analysis with intuitionistic fuzzy optimistic/pessimistic operators. Expert Syst Appl 37:7762–7774

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Marc Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2008) Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis. Decis Support Syst 45:278–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Kress M (1991) A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data. Eur J Oper Res 54:191–198

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eum Y, Park KS, Kim SH (2001) Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value. Comput Oper Res 28:397–409

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BF, Meier P (2000) Energy decisions and the environment: a guide to the use of multicriteria methods. Kluwer, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision-making: methods and applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decision with multiples objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M et al (2015) Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26:435–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Ahn BS (2019) Extended VIKOR method using incomplete criteria weights. Expert Syst Appl 126:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Choi SH, Kim JK (1999) An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision-making with incomplete information: range based approach. Eur J Oper Res 118:139–152

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch PL, Ishizaka A (2019) A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 277:391–393

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Park KS, Eum YS, Park K (2001) Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information. Eur J Oper Res 134:557–563

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chen Y, Yue C, Song H (2007) Dominance measuring based approach for multiattribute decision-making with imprecise weights. J Inf Comput Sci 9:3305–3313

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D et al (2020) An integrated approach towards modeling ranked weights. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106629 (Article 106629)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P et al (2021a) A weighting model based on best-worst method and its application for environmental performance evaluation. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107168 (Article 107168)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P et al (2021b) Identify and rank the challenges of implementing sustainable supply chain blockchain technology using the Bayesian Best Worst Method. Technol Econ Dev Econ 27:656–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y et al (2021c) Ranking range models under incomplete attribute weight information in the selected six MADM methods. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madić M, Radovanović M, Manić M (2016) Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids. Decis Sci Lett 5:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos A, Jimenez A, Aguayo EA, Sabio P (2014) Dominance intensity measuring methods in MCDM with ordinal relations regarding weights. Eur J Oper Res 70:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrimmon KR (1968) Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum. RM-4823-ARPA. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

  • Muscat J (2014) Functional analysis: an introduction to metric spaces, Hilbert spaces, and Banach algebras. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade

  • Ozerol G, Karasakal E (2008) Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problem with imprecise information. J Oper Res Soc 59:1253–1268

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS (2004) Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34:601–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Jeong I (2011) How to treat strict preference information in multicriteria decision analysis. J Oper Res Soc 62:1771–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Kim SH (1997) Tools for interactive multi-attribute decision-making with incompletely identified information. Eur J Oper Res 98:111–123

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:26–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebaï A, Martel JM (2000) Rangements BBTOPSIS fondés sur des intervalles de proximités relatives avec qualification des préférences. RAIRO Oper Res 34:449–465

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salo A, Punkka A (2005) A rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur J Oper Res 163:338–356

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin RK (1977) Screening of multiattribute alternatives. Omega 5:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Zhu J (2019) Three-reference-point decision-making method with incomplete weight information considering independent and interactive characteristics. Inf Sci 503:148–168

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Voorneveld M (2003) Characterization of Pareto dominance. Oper Res Lett 31:7–11

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE (1986) The use of screening in policy analysis. Manag Sci 32:389–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2006) Multi-criteria decision-making approach with incomplete certain information based on ternary AHP. J Syst Eng Electron 17:109–114

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang J, Chen X (2016) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method based on fuzzy structured element with incomplete weight information. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 13:1–17

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weir JD, Hendrix J, Gutman AJ (2014) The triage method: screening alternatives over time with multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Multicrit Decis Mak 4:311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2007) A method for multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting. Knowl Based Syst 20:719–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakowitz DS, Lane L, Szidaravoshy F (1993) Multiattribute decision-making dominance with respect to an importance order of the attributes. Appl Math Comput 54:167–181

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB (2000) Minimax reference point approach and its application for multiobjective optimization. Eur J Oper Res 126:541–556

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Zaraté P, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2019) A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Manag Decis 57:2501–2519

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) Calculs of fuzzy restrictions. In: Zadeh LA, Fu KS, Tanaka K, Shimura M (eds) Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2010) A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technol Econ Dev Econ 16:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J, Zakarevicius A (2012) Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika 122:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XL, Xu ZS, Wang H (2015) Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: a deviation modeling approach. Inf Fus 25:49–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to the four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Modeling and Optimization for Decisional, Industrial and Logistic Systems (MODILS), Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Sfax, Airport Road, Km 4, PO Box 1088, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia

    Mohamed Souissi

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

    Brahim Hnich

Authors
  1. Mohamed Souissi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brahim Hnich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Souissi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Communicated by Anibal Tavares de Azevedo.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 17.

Table 17 Normalized decision matrix (Liu et al. 2020)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souissi, M., Hnich, B. A safe sequential screening technique for solving multi-attribute choice problems under ranked weights. Comp. Appl. Math. 41, 163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-01843-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-01843-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation