Skip to main content
Log in

A study of range equalities for mixed products of two matrices and their generalized inverses

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generalized inverses of matrices are extensions of ordinary inverses of nonsingular matrices to singular matrices, and people can construct various matrix expressions and equalities that involve matrices and their generalized inverses. This article considers a fundamental problem in theory of generalized inverses of matrices on characterizing range equalities composed of matrices and their generalized inverses. The coverage includes providing some general principles of dealing with this kind of problems, establishing a group of necessary and sufficient conditions for the equality \(\mathrm{range}(D_1 - C_1A_1^{\dag }B_1) = \mathrm{range}(D_2 - C_2A_2^{\dag }B_2)\) to hold for the Moore–Penrose generalized inverses \(A_1^{\dag }\) and \(A_2^{\dag }\) through the skillful use of the matrix rank method and the block matrix representation method, establishing a variety of range equalities with extrusion properties for multiple matrix products composed of two matrices and their conjugate transposes and Moore–Penrose generalized inverses, and deriving a group of novel necessary and sufficient conditions for the reverse-order law to hold via the matrix range equality method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ando T (1979) Generalized Schur complements. Linear Algebra Appl 27:173–186

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Israel A (2002) The moore of the Moore–Penrose inverse. Electron J Linear Algebra 9:150–157

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Israel A, Greville TNE (2003) Generalized inverses: theory and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein DS (2018) Scalar, vector, and matrix mathematics: theory, facts, and formulas revised and expanded edition, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burns F, Carlson D, Haynsworth E, Markham T (1974) Generalized inverse formulas using the Schur complements. SIAM J Appl Math 26:254–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Butler CA, Morley TD (1988) Six generalized Schur complements. Linear Algebra Appl 106:259–269

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell SL, Meyer CD Jr (2009) Generalized inverses of linear transformations. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson D (1986) What are Schur complements, anyway? Linear Algebra Appl 74:257–275

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson D, Haynsworth E, Markham T (1974) A generalization of the Schur complement by means of the Moore–Penrose inverse. SIAM J Appl Math 26:169–175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erdelyi I (1966) On the “reverse order law” related to the generalized inverse of matrix products. J Assoc Comp Mach 13:439–443

  • Erdelyi I (1968) Partial isometries closed under multiplication on Hilbert spaces. J Math Anal Appl 22:546–551

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler M (1981) Remarks on the Schur complement. Linear Algebra Appl 39:189–195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galperin AM, Waksman Z (1980) On pseudo inverse of operator products. Linear Algebra Appl 33:123–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greville TNE (1967) Note on the generalized inverse of a matrix product. SIAM Rev 8(1966): 518–521 (and Erratum, SIAM Rev. 9, 249)

  • Hartwig RE (1986) The reverse order law revisited. Linear Algebra Appl 76:241–246

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig RE, Spindelböck K (1983) Matrices for which \(A^{\ast }\) and \(A^{\dagger }\) can commute. Linear Multilinear Algebra 14:241–256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haynsworth EV (1970) Applications of an inequality for the Schur complement. Proc Am Math Soc 24:512–516

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Izumino S (1982) The product of operators with closed range and an extension of the reverse order law. Tôhoku Math J 34:43–52

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marsaglia G, Styan GPH (1974) Equalities and inequalities for ranks of matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2:269–292

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore EH (1920) On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull Am Math Soc 26:394–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette DV (1981) Schur complements and statistics. Linear Algebra Appl 36:187–295

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1955) A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 51:406–413

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwerdtfeger H (1950) Introduction to linear algebra and the theory of matrices. P. Noordhoff, Groningen

  • Tian Y (1994) Reverse order laws for the generalized inverses of multiple matrix products. Linear Algebra Appl 211:185–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2002) Rank equalities related to outer inverses of matrices and applications. Linear Multilinear Algebra 49:269–288

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2004) Using rank formulas to characterize equalities for Moore–Penrose inverses of matrix products. Appl Math Comput 147:581–600

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2005) The reverse-order law \((AB)^{\dagger } =B^{\dagger }(A^{\dagger }ABB^{\dagger })^{\dagger } A^{\dagger }\) and its equivalent equalities. J Math Kyoto Univ 45:841–850

  • Tian Y (2007) The equivalence between \((AB)^{\dagger } =B^{\dagger }A^{\dagger }\) and other mixed-type reverse-order laws. Internat J Math Edu Sci Tech 37:331–339

  • Tian Y (2019) On relationships between two linear subspaces and two orthogonal projectors. Spec Matrices 7:142–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2020a) A family of 512 reverse order laws for generalized inverses of a matrix product: a review. Heliyon 6:e04924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2020b) Miscellaneous reverse order laws for generalized inverses of matrix products with applications. Adv Oper Theory 5:1889–1942

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2021a) Miscellaneous reverse order laws and their equivalent facts for generalized inverses of a triple matrix product. AIMS Math 6:13845–13886

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y (2021b) Equivalence analysis of different reverse order laws for generalized inverses of a matrix product. Indian J Pure Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-021-00200-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F (2005) The schur complement and its applications. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank referees for their thorough and scholarly reports to the earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongge Tian.

Additional information

Communicated by Margherita Porcelli.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y. A study of range equalities for mixed products of two matrices and their generalized inverses. Comp. Appl. Math. 41, 384 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02084-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02084-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation