Skip to main content
Log in

Strong stability-preserving three-derivative Runge–Kutta methods

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we present the explicit strong stability-preserving (SSP) three-derivative Runge–Kutta (ThDRK) methods and propose the order accuracy conditions for ThDRK methods by Albrecht’s approach. Additionally, we develop the SSP theory based on the new Taylor series condition for the ThDRK methods and find its optimal SSP coefficient with the corresponding parameters. By comparing with two-derivative Runge–Kutta (TDRK) methods, Runge–Kutta (RK) methods and second derivative general linear methods (SGLMs), the theoretical and numerical results show that the ThDRK methods have the largest effective SSP coefficient for the order accuracy (\(3\le p\le 5\)). The numerical experiments reveal that the ThDRK methods maintain the designed order of convergence on the linear advection and Euler equation, and indicate the ThDRK methods have effective computational cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials for this study may be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11721202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Yan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any financial interests or personal relationships that would improperly influence ther work.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Zhaosheng Feng.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A Order conditions for the ThDRK methods

Appendix A Order conditions for the ThDRK methods

We alternate recursively compute the global stage errors \({\varvec{\epsilon }}\) and the derivative \({\varvec{\delta }}\), \({\varvec{\sigma }}\) of the global stage errors. The terms and conditions for each order accuracy of the ThDRK methods are described below.

First:

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{|c|l|} \hline \text {Condition: } &{} \tau _{1}^{n+1}=0.~~~~ \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

Second:

Third:

Fourth:

Fifth:

Sixth:

Seventh:

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, X., Jiang, Z., Yu, J. et al. Strong stability-preserving three-derivative Runge–Kutta methods. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02285-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02285-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation