Skip to main content
Log in

On solving fully rough multi-objective fractional transportation problem: development and prospects

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In these days, rough set theory has emerged as an invaluable tool for expressing uncertainty in various optimization problems as it takes into account both the consistency and the expertise of all the involved experts and thus leads to more realistic decisions. In view of this characteristic of the rough set theory, in this study, a fractional transportation problem in rough environment is investigated which is of great benefit because of being able to study the relative efficiency in various fields such as transportation, resource allocation, information theory, education, administration, etc. In particular, for many real-life transportation problems the objective may be interpreted as the ratio of physical and economic values, such as profit/cost, delivery speed/wastage, actual cost/standard cost, actual time/standard time, etc. A new methodology has been developed to solve the multi-objective fractional transportation problem with rough parameters in which, firstly, the problem is decomposed into two sub-models namely, the upper interval model and the lower interval model. Then the upper interval model is decomposed into two crisp fractional transportation problems to characterize the possibly Pareto-optimal solution and the lower interval model is decomposed into two crisp fractional transportation problems to characterize the surely Pareto-optimal solution, respectively. The proposed methodology incorporates the variable transformation method to address the non-linearity of the objective functions. Thereafter, the Pareto-optimal solution of the linearized model is obtained by using the weighted-sum method. The proposed approach provides a wide range for the obtained optimal compromise solution and allows the decision-maker to choose the best one as per the practical uses. At last, a case study is solved to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available within the article or its supplementary materials.

References

  • Agrawal P, Ganesh T (2020) Fuzzy fractional stochastic transportation problem involving exponential distribution. Opsearch 57:1093–1114

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed MM, Khan AR, Uddin MS, Ahmed F (2016) A new approach to solve transportation problems. Open J Optim 5(1):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaliah B, Fatichah C, Suryani E (2022) A new heuristic method of finding the initial basic feasible solution to solve the transportation problem. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 34(5):2298–2307

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaliah B, Fatichah C, Suryani E (2022) A supply selection method for better feasible solution of balanced transportation problem. Expert Syst Appl 203:117399

    Google Scholar 

  • Anukokila P, Radhakrishnan B (2019) Goal programming approach to fully fuzzy fractional transportation problem. J Taibah Univ Sci 13(1):864–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabani M (2006) Application of rough set theory as a new approach to simplify dams location. Sci Iran 13(2):152–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya R, Singh P, Kumari S, Obaidat MS (2020) An approach for solving fully fuzzy multi-objective linear fractional optimization problems. Soft Comput 24(12):9105–9119

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri M, Ebrahimnejad A, Razavyan S, Lotfi FH, Malekmohammadi N (2020) Fuzzy arithmetic DEA approach for fuzzy multi-objective transportation problem. Oper Res Int J 22:1479–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera RK, Mondal SK (2020) Credit linked two-stage multi-objective transportation problem in rough and bi-rough environments. Soft Comput 24(23):18129–18154

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bera S, Giri PK, Jana DK, Basu K, Maiti M (2018) Multi-item 4D-TPs under budget constraint using rough interval. Appl Soft Comput 71:364–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharati SK (2019) Trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy fractional transportation problem. Soft computing for problem solving. Springer, Berlin, pp 833–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia TK, Kumar A, Sharma MK (2022) Mehar approach to solve fuzzy linear fractional transportation problems. Soft Comput 20:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzayane S, Saad I (2020) A multi-criteria approach based on rough set theory for the incremental periodic prediction. Eur J Oper Res 286(1):282–298

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty M, Gupta S (2002) Fuzzy mathematical programming for multi objective linear fractional programming problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 125(3):335–342

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1962) Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Res Logist Q 9(3):181–186

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB, Thapa MN (2006) Linear programming 2: theory and extensions. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El Sayed M, Abo-Sinna MA (2021) A novel approach for fully intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective fractional transportation problem. Alex Eng J 60(1):1447–1463

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Rizk-Allah RM (2021) A novel approach for solving rough multi-objective transportation problem: development and prospects. Comput Appl Math 40(4):1–24

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Mahmoodirad A, Niroomand S (2021) Fractional two-stage transshipment problem under uncertainty: application of the extension principle approach. Complex Intell Syst 7(2):807–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Roy SK (2021) Fuzzy-rough multi-objective product blending fixed-charge transportation problem with truck load constraints through transfer station. RAIRO-Oper Res 55:2923–2952

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Roy SK, Fugenschuh A (2022) The multi-objective solid transportation problem with preservation technology using pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 24(6):2687–2704

    Google Scholar 

  • Giri BK, Roy SK (2022) Neutrosophic multi-objective green four-dimensional fixed-charge transportation problem. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 13(10):3089–3112

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Khanna S, Puri M (1993) A paradox in linear fractional transportation problems with mixed constraints. Optimization 27(4):375–387

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Garg H, Chaudhary S (2020) Parameter estimation and optimization of multi-objective capacitated stochastic transportation problem for gamma distribution. Complex Intell Syst 6(3):651–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock FL (1941) The distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities. J Math Phys 20(1):224–230

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Javaid S, Jalil SA, Asim Z (2017) A model for uncertain multi-objective transportation problem with fractional objectives. Int J Oper Res 14(1):11–25

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi VD, Gupta N (2011) Linear fractional transportation problem with varying demand and supply. Matematiche (Catania) 66(2):3–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karagul K, Sahin Y (2020) A novel approximation method to obtain initial basic feasible solution of transportation problem. J King Saud Uni Eng Sci 32(3):211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa HAEW, Kumar P, Alharbi MG (2021) On characterizing solution for multi-objective fractional two-stage solid transportation problem under fuzzy environment. J Intell Syst 30(1):620–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana A, Arora S (2006) The sum of a linear and a linear fractional transportation problem with restricted and enhanced flow. J Interdiscip Math 9(2):373–383

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2009) Theory and practice of uncertain programming, vol 239. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST (2016) Fractional transportation problem with fuzzy parameters. Soft Comput 20(9):3629–3636

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodirad A, Dehghan R, Niroomand S (2019) Modelling linear fractional transportation problem in belief degree-based uncertain environment. J Exp Theoret Artif Intell 31(3):393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardanya D, Roy SK (2022) Time variant multi-objective linear fractional interval-valued transportation problem. Appl Math A J Chin Univ 37(1):111–130

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mardanya D, Maity G, Kumar Roy S (2022) The multi-objective multi-item just-in-time transportation problem. Optimization 71(16):4665–4696

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Midya S, Roy SK (2020) Multi-objective fixed-charge transportation problem using rough programming. Int J Oper Res 37(3):377–395

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Midya S, Roy SK, Weber GW (2021) Fuzzy multiple objective fractional optimization in rough approximation and its aptness to the fixed-charge transportation problem. RAIRO Oper Res 55(3):1715–1741

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Naouali S, Salem SB, Chtourou Z (2020) Uncertainty mode selection in categorical clustering using the rough set theory. Expert Syst Appl 158:113555

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rebolledo M (2006) Rough intervals enhancing intervals for qualitative modeling of technical systems. Artif Intell 170(8):667–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy SK, Midya S, Weber GW (2019) Multi-objective multi-item fixed-charge solid transportation problem under twofold uncertainty. Neural Comput Appl 31(12):8593–8613

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadia S, Gupta N, Ali QM (2016) Multi-objective capacitated fractional transportation problem with mixed constraints. Math Sci Lett 5(3):235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini R, Joshi VD, Singh J (2022) On solving a MFL paradox in linear plus linear fractional multi-objective transportation problem using fuzzy approach. Int J Appl Comput Math 8(2):1–13

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HK, Kumari K, Kar S (2020) A rough set theory application in forecasting models. Decis Mak Appl Manage Eng 3(2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma MK, Dhiman N, Kamini, Mishra VN, Rosales HG, Dhaka A, Nandal A, Fernandez EG, Ramirez delReal TA, Mishra LN (2021) A fuzzy optimization technique for multi-objective aspirational level fractional transportation problem. Symmetry 13(8):1465

  • Shivani, Rani D, Ebrahimnejad A (2022) An approach to solve an unbalanced fully rough multi-objective fixed-charge transportation problem. Comput Appl Math 41(4):129

  • Stankovic M, Gladovic P, Popovic V (2019) Determining the importance of the criteria of traffic accessibility using fuzzy AHP and rough AHP method. Decis Mak Appl Manage Eng 2(1):86–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarup K (1966) Transportation technique in linear fractional functional programming. J R Naval Sci Serv 21(5):256–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao Z, Xu J (2012) A class of rough multiple objective programming and its application to solid transportation problem. Inf Sci 188:215–235

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Veeramani C, Edalatpanah S, Sharanya S (2021) Solving the multiobjective fractional transportation problem through the neutrosophic goal programming approach. Discret Dyn Nat Soc 20:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez Rodriguez JL, Villuendas Rey Y, Yanez Marquez C, Lopez Yanez I, Camacho Nieto O (2020) Granulation in rough set theory: a novel perspective. Int J Approx Reason 124:27–39

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Tao Z (2011) Rough multiple objective decision making. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1963) Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria. IEEE Trans Autom Control 8(1):59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Liang JM, Dong ZN, Tang DY, Liu Z (2020) Accelerating information entropy-based feature selection using rough set theory with classified nested equivalence classes. Pattern Recogn 107:107517

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is thankful to the Ministry of Human Resource Development, India, for providing financial support to carry out this work. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ebrahimnejad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shivani, Rani, D. & Ebrahimnejad, A. On solving fully rough multi-objective fractional transportation problem: development and prospects. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02400-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation