Skip to main content
Log in

A martingale method for option pricing under a CEV-based fast-varying fractional stochastic volatility model

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling the volatility smile and skew has been an active area of research in mathematical finance. This article proposes a hybrid stochastic–local volatility model which is built on the local volatility term of the CEV model multiplied by a stochastic volatility term driven by a fast-varying fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. We find that the Hurst exponent of the implied volatility is less than 1/2 usually but it is larger than 1/2 during an immediate period of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. We use a martingale method to obtain option price and implied volatility formulas in the both short- and long-memory volatility cases. As a result, the existing CEV implied volatility can be complemented to reflect implied volatility patterns (skewed smiles) that arise in pricing short time-to-maturity options in equity markets by incorporating convexity into it and controlling the downward slope of it at-the-money. We verify that one additional parameter of the CEV-based fractional stochastic volatility model contributes to a better qualitative agreement with market data than the Black–Scholes-based fractional stochastic volatility model or the CEV-based non-fractional stochastic volatility model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Notes

  1. In many literature works, the fBm \((W_t^H)\) is defined as equation (3) divided by \((\Gamma (2\,H+1) \sin (\pi H))^{-1/2}\) so that \(\sigma _H\) becomes 1. This is essentially equivalent to the definition (3) introduced by Mandelbrot and Van Ness (1968) from which \(\sigma _H\) depends on H.

References

  • Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Diebold FX et al (2001) The distribution of realized stock return volatility. J Financ Econ 61(1):43–76

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer C, Friz P, Gatheral J (2016) Pricing under rough volatility. Quant Financ 16(6):887–904

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennedsen M, Lunde A, Pakkanen MS (2017) Hybrid scheme for Brownian semistationary processes. Finance Stochast 21(4):931–965

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheridito P, Kawaguchi H, Maejima M (2003) Fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes. Electron J Probab 8:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SY, Fouque JP, Kim JH (2013) Option pricing under hybrid stochastic and local volatility. Quant Financ 13(8):1157–1165

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Comte F, Renault E (1998) Long memory in continuous-time stochastic volatility models. Math Financ 8(4):291–323

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cont R, Da Fonseca J (2002) Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces. Quant Financ 2(1):45–60

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J (1975) Notes on option pricing I: constant elasticity of variance diffusions. Unpublished note, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business

  • Emanuel DC, MacBeth JD (1982) Further results on the constant elasticity of variance call option pricing model. J Financ Quant Anal 17(4):533–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar-Anel M, Fan W (2023) The SEV-SV model-applications in portfolio optimization. Risks 11(2):30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouque JP, Papanicolaou G, Sircar KR (2000) Mean-reverting stochastic volatility. Int J Theor Appl Financ 3(01):101–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fouque JP, Papanicolaou G, Sircar R et al (2011) Multiscale stochastic volatility for equity, interest rate, and credit derivatives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fukasawa M, Gatheral J (2022) A rough SABR formula. Front Math Financ 1:81–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J, Sølna K (2018) Option pricing under fast-varying and rough stochastic volatility. Ann Finance 14(4):489–516

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J, Sølna K (2019) Option pricing under fast-varying long-memory stochastic volatility. Math Financ 29(1):39–83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gatheral J (2011) The volatility surface: a practitioner’s guide, vol 357. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatheral J, Jaisson T, Rosenbaum M (2018) Volatility is rough. Quant Financ 18(6):933–949

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan PS, Woodward DE (1999) Equivalent black volatilities. Appl Math Financ 6(3):147–157

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan PS, Kumar D, Lesniewski AS et al (2002) Managing smile risk. Best Wilmott 1:249–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Heston SL (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud 6(2):327–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heston SL (1997) A simple new formula for options with stochastic volatility OLIN-97-23. https://ssrn.com/abstract=86074

  • Kaarakka T, Salminen P (2011) On fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes. Commun Stoch Anal 5(1):121–133

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalemkerian J, Sosa A (2020) Long-range dependence in the volatility of returns in Uruguayan sovereign debt indices. J Dyn Games 7(3):225–237

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HG, Kwon SJ, Kim JH (2021) Fractional stochastic volatility correction to CEV implied volatility. Quant Financ 21(4):565–574

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy P (1953) Random functions: general theory with special reference to Laplacian random functions, vol 1. University of California Press, Berkeley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Livieri G, Mouti S, Pallavicini A et al (2018) Rough volatility: evidence from option prices. IISE Trans 50(9):767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB, Van Ness JW (1968) Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev 10(4):422–437. https://doi.org/10.1137/1010093

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Masoliver J, Perelló J (2006) Multiple time scales and the exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility model. Quant Financ 6(5):423–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perelló J, Sircar R, Masoliver J (2008) Option pricing under stochastic volatility: the exponential Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 06:P06010

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Platen E (1997) A non-linear stochastic volatility model. Financial Mathematics Research Report No. FMRR 005-97. Center for Financial Mathematics, Australian National University, Canberra

  • Ray BK, Tsay RS (2000) Long-range dependence in daily stock volatilities. J Bus Econ Stat 18(2):254–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder M (1989) Computing the constant elasticity of variance option pricing formula. J Financ 44(1):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone H (2020) Calibrating rough volatility models: a convolutional neural network approach. Quant Financ 20(3):379–392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tegnér M, Poulsen R (2018) Volatility is log-normal-But not for the reason you think. Risks 6(2):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referee for valuable comments that improved the quality of the paper. The research of J.-H. Kim was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea NRF2021R1A2C1004080.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong-Hoon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Silvana Manuela Pesenti.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, HG., Cho, SY. & Kim, JH. A martingale method for option pricing under a CEV-based fast-varying fractional stochastic volatility model. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02432-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02432-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation