Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of medical diagnosis of prostate cancer based on fuzzy TOPSIS–database interaction

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most preferred methods for obtaining near-ideal results for decision-making processes is the fuzzy TOPSIS approach. However, the similarity of the closeness coefficients obtained based on this approach may increase the possible error. The aim of this article is to overcome this inadequacy based on the fuzzy TOPSIS approach and to develop the decision-making network. For this, a novel approach that interprets the closeness coefficients based on the fuzzy TOPSIS–database interaction is proposed. To test the success of this novel approach, a decision-making problem based on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the second most common cause of death in men, is considered. In order to detect this cancer, a program has been developed for biopsy which is the final test applied by doctors. Finally, the results of this program are comparatively analyzed for fuzzy TOPSIS and the proposed novel approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Akram M, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math 39:1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Garg H, Zahid K (2020) Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 17(5):147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Kahraman C, Zahid K (2021) Extension of TOPSIS model to the decision-making under complex spherical fuzzy information. Soft Comput 25(16):10771–10795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Luqman A, Alcantud JCR (2021) Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl 33:5675–5703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benecchi L (2006) Neuro-fuzzy system for prostate cancer diagnosis. Urology 68(2):357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17:233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Catolona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, Brawer MK, Flanigan RC, Patel A et al (1998) Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 279:1542–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen-Tung C (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç O (2022) On topological structures of virtual fuzzy parametrized fuzzy soft sets. Complex Intell Syst 8(1):337–348

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç O (2022) Determining the membership degrees in the range \((0, 1)\) for hypersoft sets independently of the decision-maker. Int J Syst Sci 53(8):1733–1743

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç O (2022) Approaches that take into account interactions between parameters: pure (fuzzy) soft sets. Int J Comput Math 99(7):1428–1437

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç O (2022) A decision-making approach to reduce the margin of error of decision makers for bipolar soft set theory. Int J Syst Sci 53(2):265–274

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç O, Demirtaş N (2022) A mathematical analysis of the relationship between the vaccination rate and COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Turk J Forecast 6(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De SK, Biswas R, Roy AR (2001) An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 117:209–213

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Alkan N (2021) Circular intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method with vague membership functions: supplier selection application context. Notes Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set 27(1):24–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamacı H, Marinkovic D, Petchimuthu S, Riaz M, Ashraf S (2022) Novel distance-measures-based extended TOPSIS method under linguistic linear Diophantine fuzzy information. Symmetry 14(10):2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keles A, Hasiloglu AS, Keles A, Aksoy Y (2007) Neuro-fuzzy classification of prostate cancer using NEFCLASS-J. Comput Biol Med 37:1617–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji PK, Roy AR, Biswas R (2001) Fuzzy soft sets. J Fuzzy Math 9:589–602

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Metlin C, Lee F, Drago J (1991) The American Cancer Society National prostate cancer detection, project: findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 67:2949–2958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molodtsov D (1999) Soft set theory-first results. Comput Math Appl 37:19–31

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HP, Kreinovich V (2001) Fuzzy logic and its applications in medicine. Int J Med Inf 62:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parimala M, Jafari S, Riaz M, Aslam M (2021) Applying the Dijkstra algorithm to solve a linear Diophantine fuzzy environment. Symmetry 13(9):1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Sci Inf 11:341–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Hashmi MR (2019) Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision-making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(4):5417–5439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Hashmi MR, Pamucar D, Chu YM (2021) Spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy sets with modeling uncertainties in MCDM. Comput Model Eng Sci 126(3):1125–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez E (1976) Resolution of composite fuzzy relation equations. Inf Control 30:38–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez E (1979) Inverse of fuzzy relations, application to possibility distributions and medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2(1):75–86

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas I, Ozkan IA, Sert U (2010) Prognosis of prostate cancer by artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 37:6646–6650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas I, Allahverdi N, Sert U (2003) A fuzzy expert system design for diagnosis of prostate cancer. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech 1:50

  • Seker H, Odetayo M, Petrovic D, Naguib RNG (2003) A fuzzy logic based method for prognostic decision making in breast and prostate cancers. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Egawa MD, Shigehiro Soh MD, Makoto Ohori MD, Toyoaki Uchida MD, Kazuo Gohji MD, Akio Fujii MD et al (1997) The ratio of free to total serum prostate specific antigen and its use in differential diagnosis of prostate carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 79:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cangh PJ, De Nayer P, De Vischer L, Sauvage P, Tombal B, Lorge F et al (1996) Free to total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio is superior to total PSA in differentiating benign prostate hypertrophy from prostate cancer. Prostate 29:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczynski J, Fumanal-Idocin J, Lucca G, Borges EN, da Cruz Asmus T et al (2022) d-XC integrals: on the generalization of the expanded form of the Choquet integral by restricted dissimilarity functions and their applications. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(12):5376–5389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczynski J, Lucca G, Borges EN, Pereira Dimuro G, Lourenzutti R, Bustince Sola H (2021) CC-separation measure applied in business group decision making. In Filipe F, Smialek M, Brodsky A, Hammoudi S (Eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2021). Scitepress, pp. 452–462. SciTePress

  • Wieczynski J, Lucca G, Borges E, Dimuro G, Lourenzutti R, Bustince H (2022) Application and Comparison of CC-Integrals in Business Group Decision Making. In Enterprise Information Systems: 23rd International Conference, ICEIS 2021, Virtual Event, April 26–28, 2021, Revised Selected Papers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 129–148

  • Yuksel S, Dizman T, Yildizdan G, Sert U (2013) Application of soft sets to diagnose the prostate cancer risk. J Inequal Appl 2013:229

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249(I), 301–357(II)

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Professor Dr. I. Unal Sert for letting us share the data set taken from the Urology Department in Medicine Faculty at Necmettin Erbakan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhan Dalkılıç.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demirtaş, N., Dalkılıç, O. Evaluation of medical diagnosis of prostate cancer based on fuzzy TOPSIS–database interaction. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 316 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02454-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02454-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation